Literature DB >> 30402164

Optimal sampling time-point for cyclosporin A concentration monitoring in heart transplant recipients.

Yixin Jia1, Xu Meng1, Yan Li1, Chunlei Xu1, Wen Zeng1, Yuqing Jiao1, Wei Han1.   

Abstract

The present study was performed to determine an optimal time-point for monitoring the concentration of the immunosuppressive drug cyclosporin A (CsA) in heart transplant patients and its efficacy in the prevention of transplant rejection. A total of 32 transplant recipients were randomly assigned for three treatment approaches. Recipients in groups A (n=11), B (n=13) and C (n=8) received oral administration of CsA at doses of 3.2, 3.5 and 4.4 mg/kg, respectively. The plasma CsA concentrations were examined at 2 h intervals over 12 h. Furthermore, their correlation with the 4 h pharmacokinetic profiles as the area under the plasma CsA concentration vs. time curve (AUC0-4 h) were calculated The efficacy of CsA in inhibiting cardiac allograft rejection was assessed at 2 h after oral CsA intake (C2) and adverse events of the drug were examined in the C2-monitored recipients. The plasma CsA concentration rapidly increased in most recipients with a peak level detected at ~2 h after dosing. Regression analysis revealed that among all time-points assessed, the CsA had the highest correlation with the AUC0-4 h at C2. At C2, increasing CsA doses exhibited a positive association with the measure of AUC0-4 h. The efficacy of increasing CsA target levels at C2 in preventing heart transplant rejection was comparable, as the survival rate was 100% in all of the treatment groups. However, the proportion of recipients with side effects in group A was obviously lower than that in the other two groups. In conclusion, C2 is an ideal time-point for monitoring plasma CsA levels with a utility for individualising the next scheduled dose for each patient to ensure that target levels are maintained and achieve a high efficacy and safety of CsA therapy in heart transplant recipients (clinical trial no. 12002610).

Entities:  

Keywords:  AUC0-4 h; CsA concentration at 2 h; correlation coefficient; cyclosporin A; heart transplantation

Year:  2018        PMID: 30402164      PMCID: PMC6200973          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.6711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


  33 in total

1.  Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart rejection.

Authors:  Susan Stewart; Gayle L Winters; Michael C Fishbein; Henry D Tazelaar; Jon Kobashigawa; Jacki Abrams; Claus B Andersen; Annalisa Angelini; Gerald J Berry; Margaret M Burke; Anthony J Demetris; Elizabeth Hammond; Silviu Itescu; Charles C Marboe; Bruce McManus; Elaine F Reed; Nancy L Reinsmoen; E Rene Rodriguez; Alan G Rose; Marlene Rose; Nicole Suciu-Focia; Adriana Zeevi; Margaret E Billingham
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2005-06-20       Impact factor: 10.247

2.  The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: 29th official adult heart transplant report--2012.

Authors:  Josef Stehlik; Leah B Edwards; Anna Y Kucheryavaya; Christian Benden; Jason D Christie; Anne I Dipchand; Fabienne Dobbels; Richard Kirk; Axel O Rahmel; Marshall I Hertz
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 10.247

3.  Heart transplantation in patients seventy years of age and older: A comparative analysis of outcome.

Authors:  C Blanche; D A Blanche; B Kearney; M Sandhu; L S Czer; A Kamlot; A Hickey; A Trento
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 4.  Prevention of nephrotoxicity induced by cyclosporine-A: role of antioxidants.

Authors:  Sara Damiano; Roberto Ciarcia; Serena Montagnaro; Ugo Pagnini; Tiziana Garofano; Giovambattista Capasso; Salvatore Florio; Antonio Giordano
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.429

5.  A limited sampling strategy for the estimation of 12-hour Neoral systemic drug exposure in heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  C Balram; C Sivathasan; Yin Bun Cheung; Say Beng Tan; Yong Seng Tan
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 6.  Cardiac transplantation is still the method of choice in the treatment of patients with severe heart failure.

Authors:  Jerzy Korewicki
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.737

7.  Does everolimus associated with a low dose of cyclosporine in long-term cardiac transplant recipients improve renal function? Initial experience.

Authors:  M Boffini; F Sansone; F Patanè; R Bonato; M Ribezzo; C Iacovino; C Comoglio; M Rinaldi
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 8.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporine.

Authors:  K Midtvedt
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 9.  History of C2 monitoring in heart and liver transplant patients treated with cyclosporine microemulsion.

Authors:  M Cantarovich; J Barkun; N Giannetti; R Cecere; J-G Besner; J Tchervenkov
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.066

10.  Limited utility of cyclosporine C2 monitoring in heart transplant recipients receiving ketoconazole.

Authors:  M Zakliczynski; A Krynicka; M Szewczyk; J Wojarski; M Zembala
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.066

View more
  1 in total

1.  Initial dosage optimization of ciclosporin in pediatric Chinese patients who underwent bone marrow transplants based on population pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Xiao Chen; Xin Yu; Dong-Dong Wang; Hong Xu; Zhiping Li
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 2.447

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.