| Literature DB >> 30402164 |
Yixin Jia1, Xu Meng1, Yan Li1, Chunlei Xu1, Wen Zeng1, Yuqing Jiao1, Wei Han1.
Abstract
The present study was performed to determine an optimal time-point for monitoring the concentration of the immunosuppressive drug cyclosporin A (CsA) in heart transplant patients and its efficacy in the prevention of transplant rejection. A total of 32 transplant recipients were randomly assigned for three treatment approaches. Recipients in groups A (n=11), B (n=13) and C (n=8) received oral administration of CsA at doses of 3.2, 3.5 and 4.4 mg/kg, respectively. The plasma CsA concentrations were examined at 2 h intervals over 12 h. Furthermore, their correlation with the 4 h pharmacokinetic profiles as the area under the plasma CsA concentration vs. time curve (AUC0-4 h) were calculated The efficacy of CsA in inhibiting cardiac allograft rejection was assessed at 2 h after oral CsA intake (C2) and adverse events of the drug were examined in the C2-monitored recipients. The plasma CsA concentration rapidly increased in most recipients with a peak level detected at ~2 h after dosing. Regression analysis revealed that among all time-points assessed, the CsA had the highest correlation with the AUC0-4 h at C2. At C2, increasing CsA doses exhibited a positive association with the measure of AUC0-4 h. The efficacy of increasing CsA target levels at C2 in preventing heart transplant rejection was comparable, as the survival rate was 100% in all of the treatment groups. However, the proportion of recipients with side effects in group A was obviously lower than that in the other two groups. In conclusion, C2 is an ideal time-point for monitoring plasma CsA levels with a utility for individualising the next scheduled dose for each patient to ensure that target levels are maintained and achieve a high efficacy and safety of CsA therapy in heart transplant recipients (clinical trial no. 12002610).Entities:
Keywords: AUC0-4 h; CsA concentration at 2 h; correlation coefficient; cyclosporin A; heart transplantation
Year: 2018 PMID: 30402164 PMCID: PMC6200973 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.6711
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447