| Literature DB >> 27405874 |
Junzeng Fu1,2, Johannes C Schoeman3,4, Amy C Harms3,4, Herman A van Wietmarschen5,6, Rob J Vreeken3,4,7, Ruud Berger3,4, Bart V J Cuppen8, Floris P J G Lafeber8, Jan van der Greef3,5,4,6, Thomas Hankemeier3,4.
Abstract
Oxidised lipids, covering enzymatic and auto-oxidation-synthesised mediators, are important signalling metabolites in inflammation while also providing a readout for oxidative stress, both of which are prominent physiological processes in a plethora of diseases. Excretion of these metabolites via urine is enhanced through the phase-II conjugation with glucuronic acid, resulting in increased hydrophilicity of these lipid mediators. Here, we developed a bovine liver-β-glucuronidase hydrolysing sample preparation method, using liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry to analyse the total urinary oxidised lipid profile including the prostaglandins, isoprostanes, dihydroxy-fatty acids, hydroxy-fatty acids and the nitro-fatty acids. Our method detected more than 70 oxidised lipids biosynthesised from two non-enzymatic and three enzymatic pathways in urine samples. The total oxidised lipid profiling method was developed and validated for human urine and was demonstrated for urine samples from patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Pro-inflammatory mediators PGF2α and PGF3α and oxidative stress markers iPF2α- IV, 11-HETE and 14-HDoHE were positively associated with improvement of disease activity score. Furthermore, the anti-inflammatory nitro-fatty acids were negatively associated with baseline disease activity. In conclusion, the developed methodology expands the current metabolic profiling of oxidised lipids in urine, and its application will enhance our understanding of the role these bioactive metabolites play in health and disease.Entities:
Keywords: LC-MS/MS; Metabolomics; Oxidized lipids; Urine; β-glucuronidase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27405874 PMCID: PMC5009176 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-016-9742-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anal Bioanal Chem ISSN: 1618-2642 Impact factor: 4.142
Fig. 1Changes in response of the selected panel of compounds in the urine samples after 2 h enzymatic hydrolysis (at 37 °C with E. coli, H. pomatia or bovine liver GUS) compared with non-hydrolysed samples (no GUS). A y-axis represents the normalised peak area of a metabolite normalised to the mean area of the corresponding peak in non-hydrolysed urine. B y-axis represents the peak area without normalisation since 8-iso-13,14-dihydro-PGF2α and 13,14-dihydro-PGF2α were exclusively detected in GUS-hydrolysed urine. Error bars indicate standard deviation
Fig. 2The enzymatic oxidised lipid background (enzyme blank effect). LC-MS/MS chromatograms representing the procedure blank (green), followed by the three enzyme blank samples (E. coli, bovine liver and H. pomatia), and the free urine levels (blue) are overlaid for (A) PGF2a and (B) PGE2, respectively. H. pomatia GUS shows a high oxidised lipid background. Samples were monitored for PGF2α m/z 353.2 → 193.2) and PGE2 (m/z 351.2 → 271.2)
Fig. 3The stability of the IsoP, PG and NO2-FA ISTDs during the 2-h hydrolyses. The percentage changes of ISTD levels (compare 2 with 0 h) were investigated to evaluate the stability of each ISTD. Overall, ISTDs with bovine liver GUS hydrolysis indicated the highest degree of stability. The vertical dotted lines indicate 10 % change. x-axis indicates percentage changes of ISTD areas between 2 and 0 h (area2 h-ISTD/area0 h-ISTD) × 100 %. Error bars indicate standard deviation
Urinary oxidised lipids measured by bovine liver GUS hydrolysis and non-hydrolysis methods
| RNS | ROS | COX | LOX | CYP450 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Detected in both GUS-hydrolysed and GUS-non-hydrolysed urine | 11-HDoHE* | 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGE2* | 12S-HEPE | 12,13-DiHOME* | |
| 14-HDoHE | 15-keto-PGF1α | 20-carboxy-LTB4 # | 12,13-EpOME* | ||
| 5-iPF2α- VI* | 2,3-dinor-11b-PGF2α* | 5S,6R-LipoxinA4 | 14,15-DiHETrE* | ||
| 8,12-iPF2α- IV* | 2,3-dinor-8-iso-PGF2α* | 11-HETE | 8,9-DiHETrE* | ||
| 8-iso-15(R)-PGF2α* | 20-hydroxy-PGE2 # | 11-trans-LTD4# | 9,10-DiHOME* | ||
| 8-iso-15-keto-PGF2α* | Δ12-PGJ2* | 12-HETE | 9,10-EpOME* | ||
| 8-iso-PGE1 # | Δ17, 6-ketoPGF1α* | 13-HODE* | |||
| 8-iso-PGE2 | PGA2 | 13-KODE | |||
| 8-iso-PGF1α | PGD1 # | 15-HETE* | |||
| 8-iso-PGF2α * | PGD2 # | 5-HETE | |||
| PGE1 # | 9,10,13-TriHOME* | ||||
| PGE2 | 9,12,13-TriHOME* | ||||
| PGE3 | 9-HODE | ||||
| PGF1α | 9-HOTrE | ||||
| PGF2α* | 9-KODE | ||||
| PGF3α | LTD4* | ||||
| PGJ2 # | |||||
| Tetranor-PGEM# | |||||
| Detected in GUS hydrolysed urine exclusively | 10-HDoHE | 13_14-dihydro-PGF2α | 15S-HETrE | 20-HETE | |
| 8-iso-13,14-dihydro-PGF2α | 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGD2 | 15-HpETE | 12,13-DiHODE | ||
| 8-iso-15-keto-PGF2β | 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF2α | 5S,15S-DiHETE | 19,20-DiHDPA | ||
| 9-HETE | 15-deoxy-delta-12,14-PGD2 | 5S,6S-Lipoxin A4 | 11,12-DiHETrE | ||
| 15-keto-PGF2α | 5S-HEPE | 11,12-EpETrE | |||
| 16-HDoHE | 5S-HpETE | 14,15-DiHETE | |||
| bicyclo-PGE2 | 9-HEPE | 17,18-DiHETE | |||
| PGK2 | 5,6-DiHETrE | ||||
| Detected in non-hydrolysed urine exclusively | NO2-αLA | ||||
| NO2-LA | |||||
| NO2-OA |
*Significantly increased with hydrolysis; #significantly decreased with hydrolysis
Fig. 4Performance characteristics of sample preparation. Deuterium-labelled ISTDs were evaluated for (A) recovery and (B) ion suppression; values below 1 indicate presence of ion suppression (B)
Baseline characteristics of the study subjects (n = 80), subdivided according to the therapeutic response at 3 months
| All subject ( | Non-response ( | Good response ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (female, | 58 (72.5) | 31 (77.5) | 27 (67.5) | 0.453 |
| Age (mean (SD)) | 53.8 (11.0) | 52.7 (11.3) | 55.1 (10.8) | 0.461 |
| Disease duration (median (IQR)) | 5 (8.0) | 5 (7.0) | 6 (9.0) | 1.000 |
| Smoking currently ( | 23 (28.7) | 12 (30.0) | 11 (27.5) | 0.805 |
| Alcohol >7 units/week ( | 16 (20.3) | 5 (12.5) | 11 (27.5) | 0.099 |
| BMI (mean (SD)) | 26.9 (5.3) | 27.1 (5.0) | 26.7 (5.6) | 0.874 |
| RF (positive, | 57 (71.3) | 26 (65.0) | 31 (77.5) | 0.323 |
| ACPA (positive, | 57 (71.3) | 26 (65.0) | 31 (77.5) | 0.323 |
| Baseline DAS28 (mean (SD)) | 4.5 (1.0) | 4.2 (1.1) | 4.8 (0.9) |
|
| CRP (median (IQR)) | 7 (10.0) | 5 (8) | 8 (11.0) |
|
SD standard deviation, IQR interquartile range
Fig. 5Correlations between rheumatoid arthritis-associated clinical parameters and oxidised lipid levels with P < 0.10 based on multiple linear regression analyses