Literature DB >> 23689848

Early parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients with short-term relative contraindications to early enteral nutrition: a randomized controlled trial.

Gordon S Doig1, Fiona Simpson, Elizabeth A Sweetman, Simon R Finfer, D Jamie Cooper, Philippa T Heighes, Andrew R Davies, Michael O'Leary, Tom Solano, Sandra Peake.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Systematic reviews suggest adult patients in intensive care units (ICUs) with relative contraindications to early enteral nutrition (EN) may benefit from parenteral nutrition (PN) provided within 24 hours of ICU admission.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether providing early PN to critically ill adults with relative contraindications to early EN alters outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter, randomized, single-blind clinical trial conducted between October 2006 and June 2011 in ICUs of 31 community and tertiary hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Participants were critically ill adults with relative contraindications to early EN who were expected to remain in the ICU longer than 2 days.
INTERVENTIONS: Random allocation to pragmatic standard care or early PN. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Day-60 mortality; quality of life, infections, and body composition.
RESULTS: A total of 1372 patients were randomized (686 to standard care, 686 to early PN). Of 682 patients receiving standard care, 199 patients (29.2%) initially commenced EN, 186 patients (27.3%) initially commenced PN, and 278 patients (40.8%) remained unfed. Time to EN or PN in patients receiving standard care was 2.8 days (95% CI, 2.3 to 3.4). Patients receiving early PN commenced PN a mean of 44 minutes after enrollment (95% CI, 36 to 55). Day-60 mortality did not differ significantly (22.8% for standard care vs 21.5% for early PN; risk difference, -1.26%; 95% CI, -6.6 to 4.1; P = .60). Early PN patients rated day-60 quality of life (RAND-36 General Health Status) statistically, but not clinically meaningfully, higher (45.5 for standard care vs 49.8 for early PN; mean difference, 4.3; 95% CI, 0.95 to 7.58; P = .01). Early PN patients required fewer days of invasive ventilation (7.73 vs 7.26 days per 10 patient × ICU days, risk difference, -0.47; 95% CI, -0.82 to -0.11; P = .01) and, based on Subjective Global Assessment, experienced less muscle wasting (0.43 vs 0.27 score increase per week; mean difference, -0.16; 95% CI, -0.28 to -0.038; P = .01) and fat loss (0.44 vs 0.31 score increase per week; mean difference, -0.13; 95% CI, -0.25 to -0.01; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The provision of early PN to critically ill adults with relative contraindications to early EN, compared with standard care, did not result in a difference in day-60 mortality. The early PN strategy resulted in significantly fewer days of invasive ventilation but not significantly shorter ICU or hospital stays. TRIAL REGISTRATION: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN012605000704695.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23689848     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.5124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  102 in total

1.  Issues of energy and protein feeding in critically ill: the permissive underfeeding trial.

Authors:  Peter J M Weijs
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Editorial on the original article entitled "Permissive underfeeding of standard enteral feeding in critically ill adults" published in the New England Journal of Medicine on June 18, 2015.

Authors:  Michael P Casaer; Greet Van den Berghe
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-09

Review 3.  Energy, Protein, Carbohydrate, and Lipid Intakes and Their Effects on Morbidity and Mortality in Critically Ill Adult Patients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anna Patkova; Vera Joskova; Eduard Havel; Miroslav Kovarik; Monika Kucharova; Zdenek Zadak; Miloslav Hronek
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 8.701

4.  [Early parenteral or enteral nutrition in intensive care patients. Results of the CALORIES Trial].

Authors:  U Janssens; W Druml
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 0.840

5.  Significant publications for pharmacy nutrition support practice in 2013.

Authors:  Roland N Dickerson; Vanessa J Kumpf; Carol J Rollins; Eric H Frankel; Michael D Kraft; Todd W Canada; Catherine M Crill
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2014-09

6.  Energy deficit is clinically relevant for critically ill patients: yes.

Authors:  Claude Pichard; Taku Oshima; Mette M Berger
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Impact of early nutrition and feeding route on outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients with shock: a post hoc marginal structural model study.

Authors:  Jean Reignier; Michael Darmon; Romain Sonneville; Anne-Laure Borel; Maité Garrouste-Orgeas; Stéphane Ruckly; Bertrand Souweine; Anne-Sylvie Dumenil; Hakim Haouache; Christophe Adrie; Laurent Argaud; Lilia Soufir; Guillaume Marcotte; Virginie Laurent; Dany Goldgran-Toledano; Christophe Clec'h; Carole Schwebel; Elie Azoulay; Jean-François Timsit
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  Nutrition in critical care.

Authors:  R Chowdhury; S Lobaz
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2019-01-26

9.  ACG Clinical Guideline: Nutrition Therapy in the Adult Hospitalized Patient.

Authors:  Stephen A McClave; John K DiBaise; Gerard E Mullin; Robert G Martindale
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 10.  How soon should we start interventional feeding in the ICU?

Authors:  Richard D Fremont; Todd W Rice
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.287

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.