Literature DB >> 27402980

A Mixed-Methods Analysis in Assessing Students' Professional Development by Applying an Assessment for Learning Approach.

Michael J Peeters1, Varun A Vaidya1.   

Abstract

Objective. To describe an approach for assessing the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education's (ACPE) doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) Standard 4.4, which focuses on students' professional development. Methods. This investigation used mixed methods with triangulation of qualitative and quantitative data to assess professional development. Qualitative data came from an electronic developmental portfolio of professionalism and ethics, completed by PharmD students during their didactic studies. Quantitative confirmation came from the Defining Issues Test (DIT)-an assessment of pharmacists' professional development. Results. Qualitatively, students' development reflections described growth through this course series. Quantitatively, the 2015 PharmD class's DIT N2-scores illustrated positive development overall; the lower 50% had a large initial improvement compared to the upper 50%. Subsequently, the 2016 PharmD class confirmed these average initial improvements of students and also showed further substantial development among students thereafter. Conclusion. Applying an assessment for learning approach, triangulation of qualitative and quantitative assessments confirmed that PharmD students developed professionally during this course series.

Keywords:  assessment; development; portfolio; professionalism

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27402980      PMCID: PMC4937972          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe80577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  29 in total

1.  Mindful practice.

Authors:  R M Epstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  A social science perspective on gifts to physicians from industry.

Authors:  Jason Dana; George Loewenstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-07-09       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Is There a Role for Spin Doctors in Med Ed Research?

Authors:  Gail M Sullivan
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-09

4.  Development of an instrument to measure professionalism.

Authors:  Marie A Chisholm; Henry Cobb; Lori Duke; Charles McDuffie; William K Kennedy
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  A power primer.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  The impact of programmatic assessment on student learning: what can the students tell us?

Authors:  Asela Olupeliyawa; Chinthaka Balasooriya
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 6.251

7.  What is reflection? A conceptual analysis of major definitions and a proposal of a five-component model.

Authors:  Quoc Dinh Nguyen; Nicolas Fernandez; Thierry Karsenti; Bernard Charlin
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 6.251

8.  A schematic representation of the professional identity formation and socialization of medical students and residents: a guide for medical educators.

Authors:  Richard L Cruess; Sylvia R Cruess; J Donald Boudreau; Linda Snell; Yvonne Steinert
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Professional identity (trans)formation in medical education: reflection, relationship, resilience.

Authors:  Hedy S Wald
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  Can knowledge tests and situational judgement tests predict selection centre performance?

Authors:  Haroon Ahmed; Melody Rhydderch; Phil Matthews
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 6.251

View more
  5 in total

1.  Targeting Assessment for Learning within Pharmacy Education.

Authors:  Michael J Peeters
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Determining Indicators of High-Quality Application Activities for Team-Based Learning.

Authors:  Kristin K Janke; Robert A Bechtol; Stephanie James; Gardner Lepp; Rebecca Moote; Peter Clapp
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Using Focus Groups to Explore Evolving Perceptions of Student Pharmacists' Curricular Experiences.

Authors:  Lindsey E Moseley; Channing R Ford; Emily B Wilkins
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Perspectives of Pharmacy Graduates Toward an Undergraduate Ethics Course and Its Potential Impact on Their Professional Practice.

Authors:  Nadir Kheir; Ahmed Awaisu; Sohayla Ibrahim; Sara Murshid Al-Dulaimi; Hoda Gad
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2019-12-13

Review 5.  Where the rubber meets the road - An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education.

Authors:  Suzanne Schut; Lauren A Maggio; Sylvia Heeneman; Jan van Tartwijk; Cees van der Vleuten; Erik Driessen
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2020-10-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.