Literature DB >> 27401956

Visualizing the Histotripsy Process: Bubble Cloud-Cancer Cell Interactions in a Tissue-Mimicking Environment.

Eli Vlaisavljevich1, Adam Maxwell2, Lauren Mancia3, Eric Johnsen3, Charles Cain4, Zhen Xu5.   

Abstract

Histotripsy is a non-invasive ultrasonic ablation method that uses cavitation to mechanically fractionate tissue into acellular debris. With a sufficient number of pulses, histotripsy can completely fractionate tissue into a liquid-appearing homogenate with no cellular structures. The location, shape and size of lesion formation closely match those of the cavitation cloud. Previous work has led to the hypothesis that the rapid expansion and collapse of histotripsy bubbles fractionate tissue by inducing large stress and strain on the tissue structures immediately adjacent to the bubbles. In the work described here, the histotripsy bulk tissue fractionation process is visualized at the cellular level for the first time using a custom-built 2-MHz transducer incorporated into a microscope stage. A layer of breast cancer cells were cultured within an optically transparent fibrin-based gel phantom to mimic cells inside a 3-D extracellular matrix. To test the hypothesis, the cellular response to single and multiple histotripsy pulses was investigated using high-speed optical imaging. Bubbles were always generated in the extracellular space, and significant cell displacement/deformation was observed for cells directly adjacent to the bubble during both bubble expansion and collapse. The largest displacements were observed during collapse for cells immediately adjacent to the bubble, with cells moving more than 150-300 μm in less than 100 μs. Cells often underwent multiple large deformations (>150% strain) over multiple pulses, resulting in the bisection of cells multiple times before complete removal. To provide theoretical support to the experimental observations, a numerical simulation was conducted using a single-bubble model, which indicated that histotripsy exerts the largest strains and cell displacements in the regions immediately adjacent to the bubble. The experimental and simulation results support our hypothesis, which helps to explain the formation of the sharp lesions formed in histotripsy therapy localized to the regions directly exposed to the bubbles.
Copyright © 2016 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Cavitation; Cell–bubble interactions; Histotripsy; Tissue fractionation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27401956      PMCID: PMC5010997          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  42 in total

1.  The role of cavitation microjets in the therapeutic applications of ultrasound.

Authors:  E A Brujan
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Experimental investigation of the effect of stiffness, exposure time and scan direction on the dimension of ultrasound histotripsy lesions.

Authors:  Jin Xu; Timothy A Bigelow
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 3.  Cavitation bioeffects.

Authors:  Eitan Kimmel
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2006

4.  Sonoporation from jetting cavitation bubbles.

Authors:  Claus-Dieter Ohl; Manish Arora; Roy Ikink; Nico de Jong; Michel Versluis; Michael Delius; Detlef Lohse
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Shear stress in cells generated by ultrasound.

Authors:  Junru Wu
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 3.667

6.  Blood vessel deformations on microsecond time scales by ultrasonic cavitation.

Authors:  Hong Chen; Wayne Kreider; Andrew A Brayman; Michael R Bailey; Thomas J Matula
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  Dependence of ablative ability of high-intensity focused ultrasound cavitation-based histotripsy on mechanical properties of agar.

Authors:  Jin Xu; Timothy A Bigelow; Gabriel Davis; Alex Avendano; Pranav Shrotriya; Kevin Bergler; Zhong Hu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Numerical modeling of bubble dynamics in viscoelastic media with relaxation.

Authors:  M T Warnez; E Johnsen
Journal:  Phys Fluids (1994)       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.521

9.  Single cell membrane poration by bubble-induced microjets in a microfluidic chip.

Authors:  Z G Li; A Q Liu; E Klaseboer; J B Zhang; C D Ohl
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 6.799

10.  Probability of cavitation for single ultrasound pulses applied to tissues and tissue-mimicking materials.

Authors:  Adam D Maxwell; Charles A Cain; Timothy L Hall; J Brian Fowlkes; Zhen Xu
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.998

View more
  17 in total

1.  Robotically-Assisted Sonic Therapy for Renal Ablation in a Live Porcine Model: Initial Preclinical Results.

Authors:  Emily A Knott; John F Swietlik; Katherine C Longo; Rao F Watson; Chelsey M Green; E Jason Abel; Meghan G Lubner; J Louis Hinshaw; Amanda R Smolock; Zhen Xu; Fred T Lee; Timothy J Ziemlewicz
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 2.  For Whom the Bubble Grows: Physical Principles of Bubble Nucleation and Dynamics in Histotripsy Ultrasound Therapy.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Eli Vlaisavljevich; Adam D Maxwell
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Transcostal Histotripsy Ablation in an In Vivo Acute Hepatic Porcine Model.

Authors:  Emily A Knott; Katherine C Longo; Eli Vlaisavljevich; Xaiofei Zhang; John F Swietlik; Zhen Xu; Allison C Rodgers; Annie M Zlevor; Paul F Laeseke; Timothy L Hall; Fred T Lee; Timothy J Ziemlewicz
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 4.  Focused ultrasound: tumour ablation and its potential to enhance immunological therapy to cancer.

Authors:  Giovanni Mauri; Luca Nicosia; Zhen Xu; Salvatore Di Pietro; Lorenzo Monfardini; Guido Bonomo; Gianluca Maria Varano; Francesco Prada; Paolo Della Vigna; Franco Orsi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Modeling tissue-selective cavitation damage.

Authors:  Lauren Mancia; Eli Vlaisavljevich; Nyousha Yousefi; Mauro Rodriguez; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Fred T Lee; David Henann; Christian Franck; Zhen Xu; Eric Johnsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Effects of f-number on the histotripsy intrinsic threshold and cavitation bubble cloud behavior.

Authors:  Eli Vlaisavljevich; Tyler Gerhardson; Tim Hall; Zhen Xu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Histotripsy Ablation of Bone Tumors: Feasibility Study in Excised Canine Osteosarcoma Tumors.

Authors:  Lauren Arnold; Alissa Hendricks-Wenger; Sheryl Coutermarsh-Ott; Jessica Gannon; Alayna N Hay; Nikolaos Dervisis; Shawna Klahn; Irving C Allen; Joanne Tuohy; Eli Vlaisavljevich
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  The influence of medium elasticity on the prediction of histotripsy-induced bubble expansion and erythrocyte viability.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  In vitro assessment of stiffness-dependent histotripsy bubble cloud activity in gel phantoms and blood clots.

Authors:  Samuel A Hendley; Viktor Bollen; Gregory J Anthony; Jonathan D Paul; Kenneth B Bader
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Bubble Cloud Behavior and Ablation Capacity for Histotripsy Generated from Intrinsic or Artificial Cavitation Nuclei.

Authors:  Connor Edsall; Zerin Mahzabin Khan; Lauren Mancia; Sarah Hall; Waleed Mustafa; Eric Johnsen; Alexander L Klibanov; Yasemin Yuksel Durmaz; Eli Vlaisavljevich
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.