Literature DB >> 16749890

Cavitation bioeffects.

Eitan Kimmel1.   

Abstract

Acoustic cavitation takes place when tiny gas bubbles oscillate, grow, and collapse in liquid under the influence of ultrasonic field. This study reviews cavitation bioeffects that are found both in vivo and in vitro when exposed to either low- or high-power acoustics. Proposed mechanisms are discussed here as well based on theoretical studies, simulations and test bench experiments. Bioeffects are induced in living tissue once the gas bubble is, for instance, within a blood vessel in close vicinity to the endothelium or to the red blood cells. Conditions for inducing various bioeffects are discussed - from severe damage, such as cell necrosis, to delicate alterations, such as increased permeability of cell membrane. Present and potential applications for therapeutic purpose from stone pulverization and tissue ablation to gene transfection and transdermal delivery are reviewed including the growing use of artificial microbubbles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16749890     DOI: 10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v34.i2.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0278-940X


  26 in total

1.  Forced wave motion with internal and boundary damping.

Authors:  Tobias Louw; Scott Whitney; Anu Subramanian; Hendrik Viljoen
Journal:  J Appl Phys       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Cationic versus neutral microbubbles for ultrasound-mediated gene delivery in cancer.

Authors:  David S Wang; Cedric Panje; Marybeth A Pysz; Ramasamy Paulmurugan; Jarrett Rosenberg; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Michel Schneider; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Intramembrane cavitation as a unifying mechanism for ultrasound-induced bioeffects.

Authors:  Boris Krasovitski; Victor Frenkel; Shy Shoham; Eitan Kimmel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Numerical modeling of bubble dynamics in viscoelastic media with relaxation.

Authors:  M T Warnez; E Johnsen
Journal:  Phys Fluids (1994)       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.521

5.  Estimating concentration of ultrasound contrast agents with backscatter coefficients: experimental and theoretical aspects.

Authors:  Scott M Leithem; Roberto J Lavarello; William D O'Brien; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Can ultrasound enable efficient intracellular uptake of molecules? A retrospective literature review and analysis.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Jing Yan; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Ultrasonic bioreactor as a platform for studying cellular response.

Authors:  Anuradha Subramanian; Joseph A Turner; Gaurav Budhiraja; Sanjukta Guha Thakurta; Nicholas P Whitney; Sai Siddhartha Nudurupati
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.056

8.  Thermodynamics of interleaflet cavitation in lipid bilayer membranes.

Authors:  Shay M Rappaport; Alexander M Berezhkovskii; Joshua Zimmerberg; Sergey M Bezrukov
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2013-02-21

9.  Evaluation of pulsed high intensity focused ultrasound exposures on metastasis in a murine model.

Authors:  Hilary Hancock; Matthew R Dreher; Nigel Crawford; Claire B Pollock; Jennifer Shih; Bradford J Wood; Kent Hunter; Victor Frenkel
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 5.150

10.  Ultrasound for molecular imaging and therapy in cancer.

Authors:  Osamu F Kaneko; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2012-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.