| Literature DB >> 27399676 |
Maximiliano Martínez-Cifuentes1, Graciela Clavijo-Allancan2, Pamela Zuñiga-Hormazabal3, Braulio Aranda4, Andrés Barriga5, Boris Weiss-López6, Ramiro Araya-Maturana7.
Abstract
A series of a new type of tetracyclic carbazolequinones incorporating a carbonyl group at the ortho position relative to the quinone moiety was synthesized and analyzed by tandem electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI/MS-MS), using Collision-Induced Dissociation (CID) to dissociate the protonated species. Theoretical parameters such as molecular electrostatic potential (MEP), local Fukui functions and local Parr function for electrophilic attack as well as proton affinity (PA) and gas phase basicity (GB), were used to explain the preferred protonation sites. Transition states of some main fragmentation routes were obtained and the energies calculated at density functional theory (DFT) B3LYP level were compared with the obtained by ab initio quadratic configuration interaction with single and double excitation (QCISD). The results are in accordance with the observed distribution of ions. The nature of the substituents in the aromatic ring has a notable impact on the fragmentation routes of the molecules.Entities:
Keywords: DFT; QCISD; carbazole; mass spectrometry; quinones
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27399676 PMCID: PMC4964447 DOI: 10.3390/ijms17071071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Structure of o-carbonyl carbazolequinones.
Figure 2Synthetic route to obtain o-carbonylcarbazolquinones CQ1 to CQ4.
Figure 3Molecular electrostatic potential maps (MEP) for o-carbonylcarbazolequinones CQ1 to CQ4. Red color indicates high electron density and blue color low electron density.
Fukui function (−) and Parr function (−) for electrophilic attack.
| Atom | Fukui Function for Electrophilic Attack | Parr Function for Electrophilic Attack | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQ1 | CQ2 | CQ3 | CQ4 | CQ1 | CQ2 | CQ3 | CQ4 | |
| O1 | 0.149 | 0.111 | 0.148 | 0.149 | 0.262 | 0.224 | 0.270 | 0.282 |
| O2 | 0.091 | 0.067 | 0.089 | 0.087 | 0.061 | 0.043 | 0.066 | 0.080 |
| O3 | 0.054 | 0.054 | 0.052 | 0.049 | 0.054 | 0.050 | 0.053 | 0.038 |
| N4 | 0.008 | 0.012 | −0.008 | 0.006 | 0.110 | 0.122 | 0.108 | 0.103 |
| O5′ | 0.026 | −0.003 | ||||||
| O6′ | −0.001 | 0.009 | ||||||
Calculated Proton Affinities (PA) and Gas-Phase Basicity (GB), in kcal·mol−1, for the protonation of oxygens 1 and 2 (same value for both oxygens) for all CQs. Results for all protonation sites are in the Supplementary Materials.
| Compound | PA | GB |
|---|---|---|
| 240.0 | 231.3 | |
| 241.0 | 232.4 | |
| 238.4 | 229.9 | |
| 238.1 | 229.5 |
Ionic species observed in the electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) spectra of CQs.
| Ion | CQ1 | CQ2 | CQ3 | CQ4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [M + H]+ | 292 | 306 | 364 | 370 |
| [M + Na]+ | 314 | 328 | 386 | a |
| [M + K]+ | 330 | 344 | a | a |
a Not observed.
Molecular and main fragment ions observed by ESI-MSn analysis of CQ1 to CQ4.
| Compound | [M + H]+
| MS2
| MS3
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 292 | 274(40) –H2O | 246(100) –CO | |
| 264(100) –CO | 246(86) –H2O | ||
| 149(40) –C9H5NO | 121(100) –CO | ||
| 144(100) –C9H8O2 | 116(100) –CO | ||
| 306 | 288(48) –H2O | 260(100) –CO | |
| 278(100) –CO | 263(100) –CH3
| ||
| 158(61) | 130(100) –CO | ||
| 149(13) | 121(100) –CO | ||
| 364 | 346(15) –H2O | 318(100) –CO | |
| 336(50) –CO | 318(35) –H2O | ||
| 292(100) –C3H4O2 | 264(100) –CO | ||
| 370 | 291(100) –Br | 263(100) –CO | |
| 342(10) –CO | 263(100) –Br |
Scheme 1Fragmentation patterns for water and CO losses from protonated CQ1.
Scheme 2Proton transfer equilibria between O1 and O2 for CQ1.
Scheme 3Energy profile of [CQ1 + H]+ fragmentation to give m/z 144. Energy relative 1 (Erel1) at M06-2x/6-311++G(3df,3pd) and Energy relative 2 (Erel2) at QCISD/6-31++G(d,p).
Scheme 4Energy profile of [CQ1 + H]+ fragmentation to m/z 149. Energy relative 1 (Erel1) at M06-2x/6-311++G(3df,3pd) and Energy relative 2 (Erel2) at QCISD/6-31++G(d,p).
Scheme 5Fragmentation pattern for protonated CQ3.
Scheme 6Fragmentation pattern for protonated CQ4.
| CQ | Yield (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| –H | 52 | |
| 1′–CH3 | 77 | |
| 3′–CO(5′)O(6′)Et | 23 | |
| 3′–Br | 39 |