| Literature DB >> 27398340 |
Maryam Sadeghi Haddad Zavareh1, Gholamhossein Ebrahimipour1, Mohsen Shahriari Moghadam2, Javad Fakhari1, Tahereh Abdoli1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Much of the environment is affected by petroleum contamination. It imposes serious health problems for humans as well as serious environmental impact. Bioremediation is an important consideration for removing environmental pollutants because, compared with other technologies, it incurrs lower costs and is environmentally compatible.Entities:
Keywords: Bioremediation; Growth kinetics; Halomonas sp; Iran; Taguchi
Year: 2016 PMID: 27398340 PMCID: PMC4935711
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Public Health ISSN: 2251-6085 Impact factor: 1.429
Combinations of the five factors and four levels on crude oil biodegradation by MS1
| Salinity (%) | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Temperature (°C) | 25 | 30 | 35 |
| pH | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| FeSO4.7H2O (g/L) | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| NH4Cl (g/L) | 0.8 | 1.6 | 2 |
Experimental conditions for crude oil biodegradation based on the orthogonal design form L16 (45)
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8.61 ± 0.54 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 36.42 ± 18.51 |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 54.18 ± 9.82 |
| 4 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 60.83 ± 9.46 |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 37.81 ± 14.75 |
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 37.85 ± 7.17 |
| 7 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 54.38 ± 8.88 |
| 8 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 73.40 ± 6.96 |
| 9 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 46.51 ± 5.12 |
| 10 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 56.62 ± 9.83 |
| 11 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 41.38 ± 11.00 |
| 12 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 56.13 ± 4.37 |
| 13 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 43.16 ± 8.50 |
| 14 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 51.31 ± 7.20 |
| 15 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 56.28 ± 9.75 |
| 16 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 36.09 ± 5.34 |
Example of kinetic models for substrate inhibition
| Haldane (Andrews, 1968) |
|
| Aiba et al. (1968) |
|
| Tessier (Edwards, 1970) |
|
μ = specific growth rate (h−1), μmax = maximum specific growth rate (h−1), Ks = half-saturation constant (mg/L), S= substrate concentration (mg/L), Ki= inhibition constant (mg/L)
Morphological characteristics and biochemical tests of MS1 strain
| Morphology | Short rod |
| pigmentation | Cream |
| Gram | − |
| Anaerobic | + |
| Oxidase | + |
| Catalase | + |
| NO3 reduction | + |
| Salt range(% w/v) | 0.5–25 |
| pH range | 5–12 |
| Temperature range (°C) | 4–45 |
| Growth on | |
| Glucose | + |
| Citrate | + |
| Glycerol | + |
| Acetat | + |
| O/F | O |
| Hdrolysis of | |
| Starch | − |
| Gelatine | − |
Fig. 1:Responding diagrams for each controlling factor. The S/N ratios of five factor demonstrated optimal combination of Salinity 2%, pH 9, Temperature 30 °C, FeSO 7H 0.04g/L, NH 0.4g/L
ANOVA for oil degradation % in the L16 (45) orthogonal array experiment
| Salinity | 883.076 | 3 | 3.28 | 0.03 |
| pH | 3399.379 | 3 | 12.62 | 0.00 |
| Temperature | 4669.017 | 3 | 17.33 | 0.00 |
| 403.961 | 3 | 1.50 | 0.23 | |
| NH4Cl | 212.793 | 3 | 0.79 | 0.51 |
SS=sum of squares of deviation, DOF = degree of freedom, F= a ratio of the mean of the squared deviation to the mean of squared error
Fig. 2:The cell biomass curve at different initial crude oil concentrations
Fig. 3:Biodegradation curve at different initial crude oil concentrations
Fig. 4:Specific growth rates of MS1 strain on different initial crude oil concentrations with fitting of various kinetic models
Parameter estimation and regression statistics for various substrate-inhibition models
| Tessier |