Literature DB >> 26229020

Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.

Daniel T Keefe1, Nicola Schieda2, Soufiane El Hallani3, Rodney H Breau1, Chris Morash1, Susan J Robertson3, Kien T Mai3, Eric C Belanger3, Trevor A Flood4,5.   

Abstract

Selected patients with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies containing Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer (PCa) may be considered candidates for active surveillance (AS). The purpose of this study was to determine if there are features that predict PCa upstaging and/or upgrading after radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 PCa diagnosed on TRUS-guided biopsies. We searched our institution's database for patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 PCa diagnosed on TRUS-guided biopsy who underwent subsequent RP between January 2010 and January 2015. Two blinded genitourinary pathologists independently reviewed and assessed the following on biopsies: (a) nuclear size, nucleolar size and distribution of macronucleoli of PCa, which were subjectively graded using a semi-quantitative scale from 1 to 3, and (b) PCa with cribriform morphology and the size of cribriform disease. Patient age, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and PSA density (PSAD) were also recorded. The Gleason score and stage (presence or absence of organ-confined disease (OCD)) were retrieved from RP reports. Comparisons were performed between groups using the chi-square test and Spearman correlation. One hundred and four patients were identified to have met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 63 (±6.1) years. Mean PSA and PSAD at diagnosis were 7.5 (±4.2) and 0.25 (±0.15) ng/mL, respectively. Gleason scores were upgraded to greater than 3 + 4 = 7 in 26.9 % (28/104) of patients, and 44.2 % (46/104) of patients had no OCD after RP. There was no correlation between age, PSA, PSAD or percent of biopsies with Gleason pattern 4 for either Gleason score upgrading or absence of OCD at the time of RP (p > 0.05). Thirty patients had cribriform morphology on TRUS-guided biopsy of which 60 % (18/30) had no OCD at RP (p = 0.04) while 36.7 % (11/30) were upgraded to Gleason score ≥3 + 4 = 7 after RP (p = 0.15). There was no association between nuclear size, nucleolar size and/or distribution of macronucleoli with upgrading and/or absence of OCD (p > 0.05). The size of cribriform pattern was not associated with the absence of OCD (p = 0.43) or Gleason score upgrade (p = 0.28). A proportion of patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 PCa at needle biopsy do not have OCD or are upgraded to higher Gleason scores after RP. In our study, patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 PCa with the presence of cribriform pattern 4 had a significantly increased chance of being found to have no OCD at the time of RP. There were no clinical or pathologic parameters at the time of TRUS-guided biopsy that identified risk factors for Gleason score upgrading at RP in this study. Cribriform morphology detected on biopsy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 PCa is associated with tumour upstaging after RP and may be considered a contraindication to active surveillance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active surveillance; Prostate; Prostate cancer; TRUS-guided needle biopsy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26229020     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-015-1809-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  26 in total

1.  Prospective validation of active surveillance in prostate cancer: the PRIAS study.

Authors:  Roderick C N van den Bergh; Stijn Roemeling; Monique J Roobol; Wouter Roobol; Fritz H Schröder; Chris H Bangma
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Nuclear roundness variance predicts prostate cancer progression, metastasis, and death: A prospective evaluation with up to 25 years of follow-up after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Robert W Veltri; Sumit Isharwal; M Craig Miller; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 4.104

3.  Cribriform growth is highly predictive for postoperative metastasis and disease-specific death in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Charlotte F Kweldam; Mark F Wildhagen; Ewout W Steyerberg; Chris H Bangma; Theodorus H van der Kwast; Geert J L H van Leenders
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 4.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Marc A Dall'Era; Peter C Albertsen; Christopher Bangma; Peter R Carroll; H Ballentine Carter; Matthew R Cooperberg; Stephen J Freedland; Laurence H Klotz; Christopher Parker; Mark S Soloway
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Clinical and pathologic predictors of Gleason sum upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series.

Authors:  Derya Tilki; Boris Schlenker; Majnu John; Alexander Buchner; Peter Stanislaus; Christian Gratzke; Alexander Karl; Gerald Y Tan; Süleyman Ergün; Ashutosh K Tewari; Christian G Stief; Michael Seitz; Oliver Reich
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 3.498

6.  Quantitative alterations in nuclear structure predict prostate carcinoma distant metastasis and death in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Masood A Khan; Patrick C Walsh; M Craig Miller; Wesley D Bales; Jonathan I Epstein; Leslie A Mangold; Alan W Partin; Robert W Veltri
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ayman S Moussa; Jianbo Li; Meghan Soriano; Eric A Klein; Fei Dong; J Stephen Jones
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-09-08       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Architectural heterogeneity and cribriform pattern predict adverse clinical outcome for Gleason grade 4 prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Fei Dong; Ping Yang; Chaofu Wang; Shulin Wu; Yu Xiao; W Scott McDougal; Robert H Young; Chin-Lee Wu
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 6.394

9.  Gleason score 3 + 4=7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen.

Authors:  Cheng Cheng Huang; Max Xiangtian Kong; Ming Zhou; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Samir S Taneja; Jonathan Melamed; Fang-Ming Deng
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 6.394

10.  Using nuclear morphometry to predict the need for treatment among men with low grade, low stage prostate cancer enrolled in a program of expectant management with curative intent.

Authors:  Danil V Makarov; Cameron Marlow; Jonathan I Epstein; M Craig Miller; Patricia Landis; Alan W Partin; H Ballentine Carter; Robert W Veltri
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.104

View more
  19 in total

1.  Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Trevor A Flood; Nicola Schieda; Daniel T Keefe; Rodney H Breau; Chris Morash; Kevin Hogan; Eric C Belanger; Kien T Mai; Susan J Robertson
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-07-10       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Presence of invasive cribriform or intraductal growth at biopsy outperforms percentage grade 4 in predicting outcome of Gleason score 3+4=7 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Charlotte F Kweldam; Intan P Kümmerlin; Daan Nieboer; Ewout W Steyerberg; Chris H Bangma; Luca Incrocci; Theodorus H van der Kwast; Monique J Roobol; Geert J van Leenders
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Characterization of a "low-risk" cohort of grade group 2 prostate cancer patients: Results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.

Authors:  Kathleen F McGinley; Xizi Sun; Lauren E Howard; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Christopher J Kane; Christopher L Amling; Matthew R Cooperberg; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 3.369

4.  The impact of multiparametric MRI features to identify the presence of prevalent cribriform pattern in the peripheral zone tumors.

Authors:  Caterina Gaudiano; Lorenzo Bianchi; Antonio De Cinque; Beniamino Corcioni; Francesca Giunchi; Riccardo Schiavina; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Eugenio Brunocilla; Rita Golfieri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 5.  Oncological outcomes of cribriform histology pattern in prostate cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giorgio Ivan Russo; Timo Soeterik; Ignacio Puche-Sanz; Giuseppe Broggi; Arturo Lo Giudice; Cosimo De Nunzio; Riccardo Lombardo; Giancarlo Marra; Giorgio Gandaglia
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 5.455

Review 6.  Cribriform Patterned Lesions in the Prostate Gland with Emphasis on Differential Diagnosis and Clinical Significance.

Authors:  Maria Destouni; Andreas C Lazaris; Vasiliki Tzelepi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  Evaluation of tumor morphologies and association with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in grade group 5 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Trevor A Flood; Nicola Schieda; Jordan Sim; Rodney H Breau; Chris Morash; Eric C Belanger; Susan J Robertson
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 8.  Cribriform Prostate Cancer: Clinical Pathologic and Molecular Considerations.

Authors:  Amanda B Hesterberg; Jennifer B Gordetsky; Paula J Hurley
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.633

9.  Computationally Derived Cribriform Area Index from Prostate Cancer Hematoxylin and Eosin Images Is Associated with Biochemical Recurrence Following Radical Prostatectomy and Is Most Prognostic in Gleason Grade Group 2.

Authors:  Patrick Leo; Sacheth Chandramouli; Xavier Farré; Robin Elliott; Andrew Janowczyk; Kaustav Bera; Pingfu Fu; Nafiseh Janaki; Ayah El-Fahmawi; Mohammed Shahait; Jessica Kim; David Lee; Kosj Yamoah; Timothy R Rebbeck; Francesca Khani; Brian D Robinson; Natalie N C Shih; Michael Feldman; Sanjay Gupta; Jesse McKenney; Priti Lal; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2021-04-30

Review 10.  On cribriform prostate cancer.

Authors:  Charlotte F Kweldam; Theodorus van der Kwast; Geert J van Leenders
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.