Han Seong Choe1, Jae Hong Lee2, Dong Ki Min3, So Hong Shin4. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, Catholic University of Daegu, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Physical Therapy, Daegu Health College, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medicine Center, Republic of Korea. 4. Department of Nursing Science, Kyongbuk College of Science, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
[Purpose] This study assessed vertebral and femoral bone mineral density in adult females. [Subjects and Methods] A total of 314 females in their 40s to 70s were divided into normal, osteopenia, and osteoporosis groups and their vertebral and femoral bone mineral densities were compared. [Results] Comparisons of T scores revealed significant differences among measurements of the third lumbar vertebra, femoral neck, Ward's triangle, and femoral trochanter. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess differences between the vertebral and femoral measurements, and significant differences and positive correlations were observed among third lumbar vertebra, femoral neck, Ward's triangle, and femur trochanter in the normal group. [Conclusion] Females in the normal, osteopenia, and osteoporosis groups showed significant differences in their third lumbar vertebrae. The lack of significant differences among measurements in the osteoporosis group in this study suggests that patients with osteoporosis require careful and accurate diagnosis.
[Purpose] This study assessed vertebral and femoral bone mineral density in adult females. [Subjects and Methods] A total of 314 females in their 40s to 70s were divided into normal, osteopenia, and osteoporosis groups and their vertebral and femoral bone mineral densities were compared. [Results] Comparisons of T scores revealed significant differences among measurements of the third lumbar vertebra, femoral neck, Ward's triangle, and femoral trochanter. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess differences between the vertebral and femoral measurements, and significant differences and positive correlations were observed among third lumbar vertebra, femoral neck, Ward's triangle, and femur trochanter in the normal group. [Conclusion] Females in the normal, osteopenia, and osteoporosis groups showed significant differences in their third lumbar vertebrae. The lack of significant differences among measurements in the osteoporosis group in this study suggests that patients with osteoporosis require careful and accurate diagnosis.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bone mineral density; Osteopenia; Osteoporosis
Bone mineral density (BMD), a measure of the mineral content of bones, is a criterion for
clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis; it is also used to assess responses to treatments,
including rates of bone loss and gain. Osteoporosis is approximately five times more common
in females than in males. By age 50, more than 1/3 of the females in Korea are in menopause.
Because bone mass decreases by 50% within 5 years after menopause, they are highly
susceptible to osteoporosis; thus, measures to prevent osteoporosis in females prior to the
onset of menopause are of vital importance1).Due to the increasing aging population in today’s society, the number of patients with
osteoporosis is increasing, with consequent increases in the frequency of spinal or hip
joint fractures due to decreased BMD and bone mass. Therefore, BMD examinations are
important for preventing fractures and providing interventions to improve BMD. Moreover,
appropriate measures based on accurate BMD measurements enable the early prevention and
treatment of osteoporosis-related complications2).To prevent osteoporosis, bone and body health must be maintained through appropriate
nutrient intake and regular exercise3).
Moreover, various factors may also affect BMD, such as weight, body fat, and muscle
mass4). Radiographic BMD measurement is
considered an important tool for diagnosing osteopenia and determining the effect of
therapy5). Among the many methods,
dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the most sensitive and appropriate standard
method6). The vertebrae and hip joints
are typically measured since they represent important areas that affect both morbidity and
mortality. Cancellous bone is present in the vertebral body, which makes it useful for
assessing treatment response, and it offers greater accuracy for recreating a patient’s
posture compared to measurements in the hip joint area7). Vertebral BMD may be elevated in older patients due to arterial
calcification and degenerative changes; in such cases, BMD measurements of the hip and
lumbar areas taken laterally via DXA can offer more accurate results. Femoral BMD is
generally measured from four areas: the proximal femoral neck, the entire hip area, the
condyle, and Ward’s triangle. The proximal femoral neck and condyle are composed of cortical
and cancellous bone, respectively7).The T-score, a measure often used in BMD measurements, is typically expressed as mean ±
standard deviation based on comparisons to maximum mean BMD found in young, healthy adults
of the same ethnicity and gender. Relative to T-scores of young, healthy adults, measured
T-scores are defined as follows: normal if ≥−1.0, osteopenia if −1.0 to −2.5, and
osteoporosis if <−2.5 (Shin, 2006). Z-scores, another measure, are unlike the T-score in
that they represent a value that is relative to the mean BMD of a healthy control group of
the same age, gender, and ethnicity7).Previous studies on BMD have reported T-scores as being useful for measuring osteoporoticfractures and changes in morphological characteristics of the proximal femur8), as well as comparing correlations of
vertebral and femoral BMD according to fractures in elderly patients with osteoporosis9). However, few studies have examined the
correlations between vertebral and femoral values in groups with different BMDs.Therefore, the present study used T-scores, which are reportedly highly associated with the
risk of fracture7), to assess the
correlations between vertebral and femoral values in three groups classified as normal, with
osteopenia, and with osteoporosis based on their BMD levels to provide clues for the
accurate diagnosis of BMD and prevention of problems associated with decreased BMD.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
The subjects included 314 adult female patients who underwent a BMD examination at “K”
Hospital in Daegu (South Korea) through July 2015. The patients were in their 40s (n=32),
50s (n=115), 60s (n=98), and 70s (n=69). Patients with a history of orthopedic surgical
treatment or spinal and/or femoral injury or diseases were excluded from the study. After
the measurements, 114, 144, and 56 subjects were assigned to the osteoporosis, osteopenia,
and normal groups based on their BMD scores. All of them understood the purpose of this
study and gave their written informed consent before experimental involvement. The study was
performed according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, and ethical approval
was granted by local committee of the institution review board of the university
hospital.Prior to BMD testing, hospital medical records were used to determine test and surgical
history, and subjects received detailed explanations of the objectives, methods, and time
required for the testing. Each examinee changed into an examination gown and was then placed
in the supine position on the center of the examination table with a rectangular sponge
supporting the legs and the waist contacting the examination table.A DPX-Bravo (GE, Healthcare Lunar, PA, USA) instrument was used to measure BMD via DXA. The
measurement areas included lumbar vertebrae 1–4, the femoral neck, Ward’s triangle, and the
femoral trochanter. Values from the first and second lumbar vertebrae, which have the
highest frequency of fracture, were excluded, and BMD values from lumbar vertebra 3 (L3)
were used9).Based on computer analysis, T-scores that showed the rate relative to the reference value
of a normal person (peak reference; %) were used and BMD measurement from each region were
classified according to World Health Organization definitions as normal (T-scores≥−1),
osteopenia (−1>T-scores>−2.5), and osteoporosis (T-scores≤−2.5). Subjects were
assigned to the normal, osteopenia, and osteoporosis groups accordingly, and their lumbar
and femoral BMD values were compared10).Analyses of test results and correlations were performed using SPSS Statistics for Windows
version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were used to assess the
subjects’ general characteristics, while one-way analysis of variance was performed to
examine inter-group differences in BMD. Pearson’s correlation analysis was performed to
analyze the vertebral and femoral BMD measurements. The statistical significance level α was
set at 0.05.
RESULTS
Comparisons of general patient characteristics among the three groups showed that the
osteoporosis group had the highest mean age and lowest mean height and weight. Among the 314
subjects, the rate of females with osteopenia or osteoporosis was very high (Table 1). Comparison of T-scores revealed significant inter-group differences in
measurements from the L3, femoral neck, Ward’s triangle, and trochanter (p<0.05) (Table 2). Pearson’s correlation coefficients analysis revealed correlations between
vertebral and femoral BMD, with the normal group showing significant differences and
positive correlations in the L3, femoral neck, Ward’s triangle, and trochanter measurements
(p<0.05). In the osteopenia group, the L3, femoral neck, and trochanter measurements
differed significantly (p<0.05), with positive correlations that were weaker than those
in the normal group. In the osteoporosis group, the L3 measurements were negatively
correlated with those of the femoral neck and Ward’s triangle and positively correlated with
femoral trochanter measurements; however, the differences were not statistically significant
(Table 3).
Table 1.
General subject characteristics
Group
Age (years)
Height (cm)
Weight (kg)
Number of patients (%)
Normal
54.2
156.8
60.2
56 (17.8)
Osteopenia
58.9
157.1
58.1
144 (45.8)
Osteoporosis
67.4
151.9
53.1
114 (36.3)
Table 2.
T-scores according to body parts
Normal
Osteopenia
Osteoporosis
L3
0.72 ± 0.89
−1.01 ± 0.93
−2.57 ± 1.16
**
Femoral neck
0.38 ± 0.87
−0.77 ± 0.84
−1.90 ± 0.90
**
Ward’s triangle
0.31 ± 1.02
−1.15 ± 0.91
−2.10 ± 0.85
**
Femoral trochanter
0.90 ± 1.01
−0.22 ± 0.87
−1.17 ± 0.81
**
**p<0.01
Table 3.
Pearson correlation coefficients between body parts
Femoral neck
Ward’s triangle
Femoral trochanter
Normal
L3
0.278*
0.294*
0.271*
Osteopenia
L3
0.192*
0.076
0.222*
Osteoporosis
L3
−0.055
−0.029
0.118
*p<0.05
**p<0.01*p<0.05
DISCUSSION
Osteoporosis is a metabolic bone disease that increases the risk of fracture due to reduced
BMD; it also leads to social problems such as increased medical costs11, 12). The use of BMD
measurements for diagnosing osteoporosis was first reported by Camerun and Sorrenson13); since that time, BMD measurements of the
lumbar region, hip joint area, and distal radius region have been generally utilized for the
early detection and treatment of osteoporosis.In the present study, the analysis of BMD measurements according to the general
characteristics of the 314 study participants revealed high rates of osteopenia and
osteoporosis. These findings were consistent with those of the study by Compston14), which reported that BMD begins to
decrease in the 30s to early 40s, resulting in an increasing number of patients with
osteoporosis, with increasing age, and a study by Ito et al.15), which reported maximum BMD in the mid-30s and a decreasing trend
thereafter with a particularly drastic decrease in females around menopause. Moreover, an
analysis of groups according to BMD showed that the osteoporosis group had the lowest mean
body weight, consistent with previous studies that reported decreasing BMD with decreasing
body weight16, 17). Inter-group comparisons of T-scores showed significant differences
among the L3, the femoral neck, Ward’s triangle, and the femoral trochanter. Moreover,
groups with a lower mean BMD tended to have a higher mean age. This observation was
consistent with the results of a study by Cho et al.18) that assessed BMD by age group, which showed the biggest difference
in BMD between those in their 60s and those in their 70s. BMD measurements of the L3 and
femoral trochanter are typically used for early detection and treatment of osteoporosis19), while Ward’s triangle results in poor
value readings or accuracy due to its small size20). Moreover, the correlations between Ward’s triangle and BMD become
weaker with increasing subject age9). In
the present study, the L3, femoral neck, and femoral trochanter had high T-scores in BMD
measurements, while the values for Ward’s triangle were relatively low, a finding consistent
with the results of precedent studies.In the present study, the rate of patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis was high,
demonstrating the need for preventing and treating osteoporosis in females as they age.
These findings were consistent with those of the study by Lane et al.21), which showed that a reduction in BMD by one standard
deviation in each category was associated with a 1.5–3-fold increase in the rate of
fractures, with fracture rates of 30% for <−2.5 SD, which was defined as the threshold at
which consultation and treatment were necessary. Similarly, Bechanan et al.22) suggested that BMD values of
70–100 mg/cm3 required immediate preventive measures and
values<70 mg/cm3 required active prevention and treatment.In the BMD correlation analysis by measurement area, the normal group showed L3 T-scores
that were significantly correlated with those of the femoral neck, Ward’s triangle, and the
femoral trochanter. Meanwhile, the L3 T-scores in the osteopenia group were correlated with
those of the femoral neck and trochanter. These findings suggest that these values can be
surmised from other locations when an accurate BMD test cannot be performed due to testing
area limitations. However, the L3 T-scores in the osteoporosis group were not correlated
with those of the femoral neck, Ward’s triangle, and femoral trochanter, a finding similar
to results from a study by Choi et al.23)
that found that the correlation between vertebral and hip joint BMD declined with increasing
age. Furthermore, all three groups showed the highest correlation between lumbar and
trochanter T-scores, consistent with the findings of a precedent study that showed the
lumbar and trochanter BMD measurements were highly correlated, likely because the ossein of
the trochanter has characteristics similar to those of the trabecular bone9).The limitations of the present study include the fact that it included females only; thus,
the results cannot be generalized to males and children. Other limitations include not
considering differences in BMD according to age; using only T-scores, showing results that
are inconsistent with BMD diagnosis using Z-score or BMD; and not considering other factors,
such as muscle or fat mass, that can also affect BMD. Therefore, future studies should also
consider other factors that can affect BMD; these investigations should also be more
broad-based to enhance the value and generalizability of our findings.
Authors: R Franciotti; M Moharrami; A Quaranta; M E Bizzoca; A Piattelli; G Aprile; V Perrotti Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2021-01-28 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Fanny Schwaabe; Johannes Gleich; Christoph Linhart; Alexander Martin Keppler; Matthias Woiczinski; Christian Kammerlander; Axel Greiner; Wolfgang Böcker; Adrian Cavalcanti Kußmaul Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2021-12-08 Impact factor: 2.374