Literature DB >> 11430528

Monitoring treatment for osteoporosis by using bone densitometry.

G M Blake1, I Fogelman.   

Abstract

In recent years, the range of treatments available for patients with osteoporosis has greatly increased. A decade ago, the only proven therapy was estrogen, but today the choices include bisphosphonates, selective estrogen-receptor modulators, calcitonin, and parathyroid hormone. Clinical trials involving bone mineral density (BMD) scans of the spine and femur have had an important role in the evaluation of these new therapies. In particular, the efficacy of treatments has now been verified in large studies powered to show reductions in fracture risk. In contrast with the use of BMD scans in research studies, their value for monitoring response to treatment in individual patients is less certain. In many cases, the increases in BMD are too small to reliably distinguish between true changes and measurement error. However, experience with estrogen and bisphosphonates suggests that these treatments have a beneficial effect on bone in most patients. Follow-up scans for patients taking these agents are therefore of limited value, apart from offering reassurance to the patient and the doctor. However, when new therapies are first introduced, follow-up scans have a useful role in building up the physician's experience and confidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11430528     DOI: 10.1053/snuc.2001.23528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  3 in total

1.  Body mass index and bone loss among postmenopausal women: the 10-year follow-up of the OSTPRE cohort.

Authors:  Jarmo Saarelainen; Vesa Kiviniemi; Heikki Kröger; Marjo Tuppurainen; Leo Niskanen; Jukka Jurvelin; Risto Honkanen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Comparison of vertebral and femoral bone mineral density in adult females.

Authors:  Han Seong Choe; Jae Hong Lee; Dong Ki Min; So Hong Shin
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-06-28

3.  How relevant is lumbar bone mineral density for the stability of symphyseal implants? A biomechanical cadaver study.

Authors:  Fanny Schwaabe; Johannes Gleich; Christoph Linhart; Alexander Martin Keppler; Matthias Woiczinski; Christian Kammerlander; Axel Greiner; Wolfgang Böcker; Adrian Cavalcanti Kußmaul
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.374

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.