Literature DB >> 27388016

Prognostic and clinical impact of PIK3CA mutation in gastric cancer: pyrosequencing technology and literature review.

Kazuto Harada1, Yoshifumi Baba1, Hironobu Shigaki1, Takatsugu Ishimoto1, Keisuke Miyake1, Keisuke Kosumi1, Ryuma Tokunaga1, Daisuke Izumi1, Mayuko Ohuchi1, Kenichi Nakamura1, Yuki Kiyozumi1, Junji Kurashige1, Masaaki Iwatsuki1, Yuji Miyamoto1, Yasuo Sakamoto1, Naoya Yoshida1, Masayuki Watanabe2, Hideo Baba3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) mutations that activate the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway have been observed in several types of carcinoma and have been associated with patient prognosis. However, the significance of PIK3CA mutations in gastric cancer remains unclear. This retrospective study investigated the relationship between PIK3CA mutations and clinical outcomes in patients with gastric cancer. Additionally, we reviewed the rate of PIK3CA mutations in gastric cancer and the association between PIK3CA mutations and prognosis in human cancers.
METHODS: The study included 208 patients with gastric cancer who underwent surgical resection at Kumamoto University Hospital, Japan, between January 2001 and August 2010. Mutations in PIK3CA exons 9 and 20 were quantified by pyrosequencing assays.
RESULTS: PIK3CA mutations were detected in 25 (12 %) of the 208 patients. Ten patients had c.1634A > G (p.E545G), 10 had c.1624G > A (p.E542K), 13 had c.1633G > A (p.E545K), nine had c.3139C > T (p.H1047R), and 1 had c.3140A > G (p.H1047Y) mutations. PIK3CA mutations were not significantly associated with any clinical, epidemiologic, or pathologic characteristic. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant differences in disease-free survival (log rank P = 0.84) and overall survival (log rank P = 0.74) between patients with and without PIK3CA mutations.
CONCLUSIONS: Mutations in PIK3CA did not correlate with prognosis in patients with gastric cancer, providing additional evidence for the lack of relationship between the two.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric cancer; PIK3CA mutation; Prognosis; Pyrosequencing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27388016      PMCID: PMC4936296          DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2422-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cancer        ISSN: 1471-2407            Impact factor:   4.430


Background

Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer deaths in the world, with 723,000 patients dying of gastric cancer in 2012 [1]. Elucidating the biological pathways leading to the development of gastric carcinoma is crucial because accumulation of genetic alterations has been shown to result in tumor development [2]. Genetic alterations involving proteins along several signaling pathways, such as the constitutive activation of receptor tyrosine kinases and G-protein-coupled receptors, and GTP-binding proteins to adaptor proteins, could lead to activation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-AKT pathway [3-6]. As PI3K signaling plays essential roles in cell growth, metabolism, survival, metastasis, and resistance to chemotherapy, the PI3K-AKT pathway has been considered extremely important in the carcinogenic process [7-10]. Mutations in the phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) gene, which encodes the p110 catalytic subunit of PI3K, have been found in several types of carcinoma [11, 12]. The hot spots of PIK3CA mutations have been located at five sites in exons 9 and 20 [13]. These mutations activate the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, activating downstream signaling pathways, and thereby contribute to carcinogenesis [13]. PIK3CA mutations in several types of human cancer have been associated with patient prognosis. However the impact of PIK3CA mutations on prognosis varies among tumor types [14]. The significance of PIK3CA mutations in gastric cancer remains unclear. Although several reports have shown a relationship between PIK3CA mutations and prognosis, relative few patients were analyzed and findings differ among studies. This study used pyrosequencing to evaluate PIK3CA mutations in patients with gastric cancer at our hospital, as well as determining the relationship between PIK3CA mutations and patient prognosis. Additionally, we reviewed the rate of PIK3CA mutations in gastric cancer and the association between PIK3CA mutations and prognosis in human cancers.

Methods

Study subjects

This study retrospectively enrolled 208 gastric cancer patients who underwent resection at Kumamoto University Hospital between January 2001 and August 2010. Patients who underwent palliative resection and/or whose tissue samples were unavailable were excluded, but patients positive on peritoneal washing cytology were included. Patients were followed-up at 1- to 3-month intervals until death or 31 March 2015, whichever came first. Disease-free survival was defined as the time from the date of surgery to the date of cancer recurrence or death. Tumors were staged according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual (7th edition) [15]. Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of the operation to the date of death. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. Informed consent or substitute for it was obtained from all patients for being included in the study. The study procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee for Epidemiological and General Research at the Faculty of life Science, Kumamoto University (Approval number: Ethic 559). Throughout this article, the definition of “prognostic marker” is consistent with REMARK Guidelines [16].

Genomic DNA extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded tissue specimens of surgically resected gastric cancers. Tumors areas were marked on hematoxylin and eosin stained slides by one pathologist (Y. Baba). Genomic DNA was extracted from tumor lesions enriched with neoplastic cells, without adjacent normal tissue, using FFPE Kits (Qiagen, Duesseldorf, Germany).

Pyrosequencing for PIK3CA mutations

PIK3CA mutations were evaluated as previously described [14]. The exon 9 PCR primers were 5′-biotin-AACAGCTCAAAGCAATTTCTACACG-3′ (forward, PIK3CA 9-F) and 5′-ACCTGTGACTCCATAGAAAATCTTT-3′ (reverse, PIK3CA9-R). The exon 20 PCR primers were 5′-biotin-CAAGAGGCTTTGGAGTATTTCA-3′ (forward, PIK3CA 20-F) and 5′-CAATCCATTTTTGTTGTCCA-3′ (reverse, PIK3CA 20-R). In the PIK3CA exon 9 pyrosequencing assays, the presence of mutations was routinely confirmed using three different sequencing primers and by the creation of a frameshifted reading of a mutant sequence relative to a wild-type sequence. The primers PIK3CA 9-RS1 (5′-CCATAGAAAATCTTTCTCCT-3′; nucleotide dispensation order, ATCGACTACACTGACTGACTGACTGACTGACTGACTG), PIK3CA 9-RS2 (5′ TTCTCCTTGCTTCAGTGATTT-3′; nucleotide dispensation order, ATACACATGTCAGTCAGACTAGCTAGCTAGCTAG) and PIK3CA 9-RS3 (5′-TAGAAAATCTTTCTCCTGCT-3′; nucleotide dispensation order, ATAGCACTGACTGACTGACTACTGACTGACTGACTG) could detectc.1634A > G, c.1624A > G, and c.1624G > A mutations, respectively. For PIK3CA exon 20, the primer PIK3CA 20-RS (5′-GTTGTCCAGCCACCA-3′; nucleotide dispensation order, CTGACGATACTGTGCATCATATGCATGCATGCATGCATGC) was used to detect the mutations c.3140A > G and c.3139C > T. Nucleotide dispensation orders were designed so that if any of the common mutations were present, it caused a shift in the reading frame and resulted in an additional peak or peaks following the mutated nucleotide. Representative pyrograms of wild-type and mutant exons 9 and 20 are shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

PIK3CA exon 9 and exon 20 pyrograms (antisense strand). a Wild-type exon 9 sequenced with the 9-RS1 primer and the c.1634A > G mutation (arrow), causing a shift in the reading frame and a new peak at A (arrowhead), which serves as quality assurance. b Wild-type exon 9 sequenced with the 9-RS2 primer and the c.1624G > A mutation (arrow), causing a shift in the reading frame and a new peak at A (arrowhead). c Wild-type exon 9 sequenced with the 9-RS3 primer and the c.1633G > A mutation (arrow), causing a shift in the reading frame and new peaks (arrowheads). d Wild-type exon 20 sequenced with the exon 20 primer and the c.3139C > T mutation (arrow), causing a shift in the reading frame and a new peak at T (arrowhead). Wild-type exon 20 sequenced with the exon 20 primer and the c.3140A > G mutation (arrow), causing a shift in the reading frame and a new peak at G (arrowhead). Mut, mutant; WT, wild-type

PIK3CA exon 9 and exon 20 pyrograms (antisense strand). a Wild-type exon 9 sequenced with the 9-RS1 primer and the c.1634A > G mutation (arrow), causing a shift in the reading frame and a new peak at A (arrowhead), which serves as quality assurance. b Wild-type exon 9 sequenced with the 9-RS2 primer and the c.1624G > A mutation (arrow), causing a shift in the reading frame and a new peak at A (arrowhead). c Wild-type exon 9 sequenced with the 9-RS3 primer and the c.1633G > A mutation (arrow), causing a shift in the reading frame and new peaks (arrowheads). d Wild-type exon 20 sequenced with the exon 20 primer and the c.3139C > T mutation (arrow), causing a shift in the reading frame and a new peak at T (arrowhead). Wild-type exon 20 sequenced with the exon 20 primer and the c.3140A > G mutation (arrow), causing a shift in the reading frame and a new peak at G (arrowhead). Mut, mutant; WT, wild-type

Statistical methods

The results were statistically analyzed by JMP software (Version 9, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). All p-values were two-sided. The means were compared by t test, assuming unequal variances. The proportional differences among the characteristics were evaluated by Pearson’s chi-squared test (χ2). Survival time was determined by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. The hazard ratio for PIK3CA mutations on mortality was assessed by Cox regression modeling. To assess whether any of these variables was associated with the relationship between the PIK3CA mutations and prognosis, they were cross-multiplied with PIK3CA mutations and subjected to the Wald test.

Results

PIK3CA mutational status in gastric cancer

Of the 208 patients who had undergone curative resection of gastric cancer, 25 (12 %) were found pyrosequencing technology to have PIK3CA exon 9 and 20 mutations (Fig. 1). Ten patients were positive for c.1634A > G (p.E545G), 10 for c.1624G > A (p.E542K), 13 for c. c.1633G > A (p.E545K), nine for c. 3139C > T (p.H1047R), and one for c. 3140A > G (p.H1047Y) mutations. Three tumors were positive for mutations at all three nucleotides in exon 9, three were positive for mutations at two nucleotides in exon 9. Fifteen samples were positive for mutations in exon 9 alone, four for mutations in exon 20 alone, and six were positive for mutations in both exons.

PIK3CA mutations and patient characteristics

PIK3CA mutations were not significantly associated with any clinical, epidemiologic, or pathologic characteristic (Table 1). We previously reported that the long interspersed nucleotide element-1 (LINE-1) methylation level in gastric cancer was a surrogate marker of global DNA methylation and genome instability [17, 18]. However, LINE-1 methylation level was not associated with PIK3CA mutations (Table 1).
Table 1

PIK3CA mutational status and clinical features in gastric cancers

FeaturesTotalPIK3CA mutation p value
MutantWild-Type
n = 208 n = 25 (12 %) n = 183 (88 %)
Age (year)0.30
 Mean ± SE20867.4 ± 2.169.8 ± 0.8
Sex0.41
 Male14816 (11)132 (89)
 Female609 (15)51 (85)
Location0.22
 Upper7513 (17)62 (83)
 Middle656 (9)59 (91)
 Lower686 (9)62 (91)
Tumor depth0.09
 T110518 (17)87 (83)
 T2292 (6)29 (94)
 T3422 (5)42 (95)
 T4253 (11)25 (89)
Lymph node involvement0.73
 Absent13517 (13)118 (87)
 Present738 (11)65 (83)
Stage0.78
 I12317 (14)106 (86)
 II404 (10)36 (90)
 III262 (8)24 (92)
 IV192 (11)17 (89)
Lauren classification0.79
 Intestinal13816 (12)122 (88)
 Diffuse709 (13)61 (87)
Venous invasion0.05
 Absent11118 (16)93 (84)
 Present957 (7)88 (93)
Lymphatic invasion0.40
 Absent11716 (14)101 (86)
 Present919 (10)82 (90)
LINE-1 methylation level (%)0.19
 Mean ± SE20874.9 ± 2.671.2 ± 1.0

PIK3CA phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha, LINE-1 long interspersed nucleotide element-1, SE standard error

PIK3CA mutational status and clinical features in gastric cancers PIK3CA phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha, LINE-1 long interspersed nucleotide element-1, SE standard error

PIK3CA mutations and patient survival

We assessed the influence of PIK3CA mutations on clinical outcome in patients with curatively resected gastric cancer. During follow-up of the 208 patients, 32 patients experienced gastric cancer recurrence and 69 died. The median follow-up time for censored patients was 5.0 years. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed no significant differences in disease-free survival (log rank P = 0.84) and overall survival (log rank P = 0.74) between patients with PIK3CA mutations and those with PIK3CA wild type (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Kaplan–Meier curves showing the relationship of PIK3CA mutational status with overall survival (left) and disease-free survival (right) in gastric cancer patients

Kaplan–Meier curves showing the relationship of PIK3CA mutational status with overall survival (left) and disease-free survival (right) in gastric cancer patients

Interaction between PIK3CA mutations and other variables in survival analyses

We also examined whether the influence of PIK3CA mutations on overall survival was modified by any clinical or pathological variable. All tested variables did not significantly interact with the relationship between PIK3CA mutations and overall survival (p for all interactions >0.05, Fig. 3). Moreover, analysis of various strata showed no significant difference in hazard ratio for overall survival between patients with PIK3CA mutations and those with PIK3CA wild type (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

PIK3CA mutations and overall survival in various strata. The loge (adjusted HRs) plot of overall survival in the PIK3CA mutation vs. PIK3CA wild-type group. The 95 % CI is also shown

PIK3CA mutations and overall survival in various strata. The loge (adjusted HRs) plot of overall survival in the PIK3CA mutation vs. PIK3CA wild-type group. The 95 % CI is also shown

Discussion

PIK3CA mutations and subsequent activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway play an essential role in cancer cell signaling pathways, involving growth factors, cytokines, and other cellular stimuli associated with human neoplasms [11, 12, 19, 20]. This study examined the prognostic impact of PIK3CA mutations on survival in patients with gastric cancer. Mutations in PIK3CA exons 9 and 20 were observed in 25 of the 208 (12 %) gastric cancer patients. However, overall survival and disease-free survival were similar in patients with and without PIK3CA mutations, indicating that PIK3CA mutations do not affect mortality after resection of gastric cancer. PIK3CA exons 9 and 20 mutation accounted for over the 80 % of the mutations [6]. Exon 9 mutation exist in helical domain, and exon 20 mutation exist in kinase domain, leading to the activating of AKT pathway and then stimulating the ability of invasion and migration [13]. Especially, E545K mutation disrupts inhibitory interaction between p110 and SH2 domain in p85 [21]. Importantly, Baba et al. have shown the relationship between tumor phosphorylated AKT expression and PIK3CA exons 9 and 20 mutation in 717 colorectal cancer [22]. The oncogenic role of mutations other than hot spot mutation has not been fully investigated. Interestingly, some tumor samples had multiple mutations on exon 9 and 20. Some group have also detected several different PIK3CA mutations in same sample by using next-generation sequencing and Sanger Sequencing. It is possible that one sample harvest three or two different mutations in the same gene [23, 24]. In addition, PIK3CA mutation can coexist with KRAS, EGFR and BRAF [25]. Thus, PIK3CA mutation has been involved in molecular pathway of cancer. Other studies have reported PIK3CA mutations in 4–25 % of gastric cancers (Table 2). The largest cohort was assessed by the TOGA study group, finding that the PIK3CA mutation rate was 24 %, or about twice as high as in the current study. However, that study evaluated mutations in all exons. A study in a Japanese population found that the mutation rate in PIK3CA exons 1, 9, and 20, as determined by pyrosequencing, was 8.7 % [26]. Directed sequencing found that the mutation rate in PIK3CA exons 9 and 20 was 7.7–15.9 % [27, 28]. Thus, the PIK3CA mutation rate observed in the current study (12 %) was comparable to rates previously reported. Interestingly, the PIK3CA mutation rate in gastric cancer is less than that in colon and breast cancers [29, 30].
Table 2

Previous studies of PIK3CA mutations in gastric cancer

Sample numberMutation rateExons evaluatedMethodReferences
1635.5 %9 and 20Direct sequencing[36]
26316 %9 and 20Direct sequencing[27]
1225 %18 and 20Sanger method[6]
4711 %9 and 20ABI prism 377 automated sequencer[37]
944.3 %9 and 20Direct sequencing[38]
1856.5 %9, 18 and 20PCR – SSCP[39]
346.0 %9 and 20High-Resolution[40]
Melt Analysis
29524 %All exonMut Sig CV[41]
1404.0 %9 and 20ABI PRISM 3100[42]
Genetic Analyzer
2318.7 %1, 9 and 20Pyrosequencing[26]
1047.7 %9 and 20Direct sequencing[28]
Previous studies of PIK3CA mutations in gastric cancer Previous studies evaluating the association between PIK3CA mutations and prognosis in human cancers have yielded variable results (Table 3). PIK3CA mutations have been associated with a better prognosis in patients with breast and esophageal cancers, but with a poorer prognosis in patients with colon, rectum, and endometrial cancers [31-35]. These differences may be due to differences in tumor histology. Discovering the mechanisms of this discrepancy is imperative for future projects.
Table 3

Studies on prognostic significance of PIK3CA mutations in several types of cancers

Cancer typeSample numberMutation rate (%)Mutation effectPrognosisReferences
Colon cancer121216UnfavorableAdjusted CS HR[31]
3.51 (1.28–9.62)
74314.5UnfavorableAdjusted OS HR[25]
3.30 (1.46–7.45)
45018UnfavorableAdjusted CS HR[29]
2.03 (1.15–3.57)
Rectal cancer2407.9UnfavorableAdjusted RS HR[32]
3.4 (1.2–9.2)
Endometrial cancer106316.2UnfavorableNot-adjusted RS HR[33]
2.18 (1.09–4.39)
Breast cancer68725.3favorableNot-adjusted CS HR[34]
0.88 (0.58–1.34)
43932.5Not significantAdjusted CS HR[30]
0.7 (0.4–1.2)
18828.7favorableAdjusted RS HR[35]
0.42 (0.20–0.92)
Esophageal cancer4067.4Not significantAdjusted OS HR[43]
1.072 (0.79–1.44)
21921favorableAdjusted OS HR[14]
0.35 (0.10–0.90)
Lung cancer11173.4Not significantOS log-lank[44]
P = 0.442
2353.4Not significantOS log-lank[45]
P = 0.15
Gastric cancer26315.9Not significantAdjusted OS HR[27]
1.1 (0.7–1.7)
2318.7Not significantNot-adjusted OS HR[26]
1.37 (0.68–3.26)
1047.7Not significantOS log-lank[28]
P = 0.96
20812Not significantNot-adjusted OS HRThis study
0.73 (0.58–2.57)

HR hasard ratio, CS cancer specific survival, RS recurrence-free survival rate, OS overall survival rate

Studies on prognostic significance of PIK3CA mutations in several types of cancers HR hasard ratio, CS cancer specific survival, RS recurrence-free survival rate, OS overall survival rate The current study found that PIK3CA mutations were not associated with survival in patients with gastric cancer, in agreement with three previous studies [26-28]. Because of their relatively large sample sizes, including this study that included samples from over 200 samples, these findings, taken together, confirm the lack of relationship between PIK3CA mutations and prognosis in gastric cancer patients. These findings, however, require confirmation by large independent cohort studies.

Conclusions

In conclusion, mutations in PIK3CA exons 9 and 20 were observed in 25 of the 208 (12 %) gastric cancer patients by pyrosequencing assays. We found that PIK3CA mutations did not correlate with prognosis in patients with gastric cancer, providing additional evidence for the lack of relationship between the two.

Abbreviations

LINE-1, long interspersed nucleotide element-1; PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-kinase; PIK3CA, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit alpha
  45 in total

1.  PIK3CA mutation status in Japanese lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Osamu Kawano; Hidefumi Sasaki; Katsuhiko Endo; Eriko Suzuki; Hiroshi Haneda; Haruhiro Yukiue; Yoshihiro Kobayashi; Motoki Yano; Yoshitaka Fujii
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 5.705

2.  Are PIK3CA Mutation and Amplification Associated with Clinicopathological Characteristics of Gastric Cancer?

Authors:  Hyunsu Lee; Il-Seon Hwang; In-Jang Choi; Yu-Na Kang; Keon-Uk Park; Jae-Ho Lee
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2015

3.  AKT1/PKBalpha kinase is frequently elevated in human cancers and its constitutive activation is required for oncogenic transformation in NIH3T3 cells.

Authors:  M Sun; G Wang; J E Paciga; R I Feldman; Z Q Yuan; X L Ma; S A Shelley; R Jove; P N Tsichlis; S V Nicosia; J Q Cheng
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  PIK3CA gene is frequently mutated in breast carcinomas and hepatocellular carcinomas.

Authors:  Jong Woo Lee; Young Hwa Soung; Su Young Kim; Hae Woo Lee; Won Sang Park; Suk Woo Nam; Sang Ho Kim; Jung Young Lee; Nam Jin Yoo; Sug Hyung Lee
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 5.  PI3K and mTOR signaling pathways in cancer: new data on targeted therapies.

Authors:  Lise Willems; Jerome Tamburini; Nicolas Chapuis; Catherine Lacombe; Patrick Mayeux; Didier Bouscary
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  High-throughput interrogation of PIK3CA, PTEN, KRAS, FBXW7 and TP53 mutations in primary endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Diego A Garcia-Dios; Diether Lambrechts; Lieve Coenegrachts; Ingrid Vandenput; An Capoen; Penelope M Webb; Kaltin Ferguson; Lars A Akslen; Bart Claes; Ignace Vergote; Philippe Moerman; Johan Van Robays; Janusz Marcickiewicz; Helga B Salvesen; Amanda B Spurdle; Frédéric Amant
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  PIK3CA mutation associates with improved outcome in breast cancer.

Authors:  Kevin Kalinsky; Lindsay M Jacks; Adriana Heguy; Sujata Patil; Marija Drobnjak; Umeshkumar K Bhanot; Cyrus V Hedvat; Tiffany A Traina; David Solit; William Gerald; Mary Ellen Moynahan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Prognostic role of PIK3CA mutation in colorectal cancer: cohort study and literature review.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Liao; Teppei Morikawa; Paul Lochhead; Yu Imamura; Aya Kuchiba; Mai Yamauchi; Katsuhiko Nosho; Zhi Rong Qian; Reiko Nishihara; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Charles S Fuchs; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Mutations of PIK3CA in gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Vivian Sze Wing Li; Chi Wai Wong; Tsun Leung Chan; Agnes Sze Wah Chan; Wei Zhao; Kent-Man Chu; Samuel So; Xin Chen; Siu Tsan Yuen; Suet Yi Leung
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  15 in total

1.  Tumor immune microenvironment is influenced by frameshift mutations and tumor mutational burden in gastric cancer.

Authors:  H Kim; Y J Heo; Y A Cho; S Y Kang; S Ahn; K -M Kim
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Multiple primary malignances managed with surgical excision: a case report with next generation sequencing analysis.

Authors:  Chiara Romano; Sandra Di Gregorio; Maria Stella Pennisi; Elena Tirrò; Giuseppe Broggi; Rosario Caltabiano; Livia Manzella; Martino Ruggieri; Paolo Vigneri; Antonio Di Cataldo
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 3.  The potential role of leptin in tumor invasion and metastasis.

Authors:  Amitabha Ray; Margot P Cleary
Journal:  Cytokine Growth Factor Rev       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 7.638

4.  MicroRNA-363-3p inhibits papillary thyroid carcinoma progression by targeting PIK3CA.

Authors:  Jia Liu; Qun Li; Rui Li; Peiyou Ren; Su Dong
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 5.942

5.  PIK3CA mutations are associated with increased tumor aggressiveness and Akt activation in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ji-Won Kim; Hye Seung Lee; Kyung Han Nam; Soyeon Ahn; Jin Won Kim; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim; Keun-Wook Lee
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-28

6.  Progression inference for somatic mutations in cancer.

Authors:  Leif E Peterson; Tatiana Kovyrshina
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2017-04-11

7.  KRAS G12V Mutation is an Adverse Prognostic Factor of Chinese Gastric Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Xin-Hui Fu; Zhi-Ting Chen; Wen-Hui Wang; Xin-Juan Fan; Yan Huang; Xiao-Bin Wu; Jing-Lin Huang; Jing-Xuan Wang; Han-Jie Lin; Xiao-Li Tan; Lei Wang; Jian-Ping Wang
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 4.207

8.  Association between PIK3CA alteration and prognosis of gastric cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hua Li; Shubo Chen; Hui Li; Jianxin Cui; Yunhe Gao; Dianchao Wu; Shangfeng Luan; Yan Qin; Tongshan Zhai; Dengxiang Liu; Zhibin Huo
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-01-02

9.  MiR-152-5p as a microRNA passenger strand special functions in human gastric cancer cells.

Authors:  Wendao You; Xing Zhang; Mengyue Ji; Yang Yu; Chen Chen; Yujia Xiong; Yiting Liu; Yibin Sun; Chenhuan Tan; Hanshuo Zhang; Jie Li; Weichang Chen; Rui Li
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 6.580

10.  Impact of phosphoinositide-3-kinase and vitamin D3 nuclear receptor single-nucleotide polymorphisms on the outcome of malignant melanoma patients.

Authors:  Francesca Morgese; Davide Soldato; Silvia Pagliaretta; Riccardo Giampieri; Donatella Brancorsini; Mariangela Torniai; Silvia Rinaldi; Agnese Savini; Azzurra Onofri; Marina Scarpelli; Rossana Berardi
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.