| Literature DB >> 27388016 |
Kazuto Harada1, Yoshifumi Baba1, Hironobu Shigaki1, Takatsugu Ishimoto1, Keisuke Miyake1, Keisuke Kosumi1, Ryuma Tokunaga1, Daisuke Izumi1, Mayuko Ohuchi1, Kenichi Nakamura1, Yuki Kiyozumi1, Junji Kurashige1, Masaaki Iwatsuki1, Yuji Miyamoto1, Yasuo Sakamoto1, Naoya Yoshida1, Masayuki Watanabe2, Hideo Baba3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) mutations that activate the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway have been observed in several types of carcinoma and have been associated with patient prognosis. However, the significance of PIK3CA mutations in gastric cancer remains unclear. This retrospective study investigated the relationship between PIK3CA mutations and clinical outcomes in patients with gastric cancer. Additionally, we reviewed the rate of PIK3CA mutations in gastric cancer and the association between PIK3CA mutations and prognosis in human cancers.Entities:
Keywords: Gastric cancer; PIK3CA mutation; Prognosis; Pyrosequencing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27388016 PMCID: PMC4936296 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2422-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Fig. 1PIK3CA exon 9 and exon 20 pyrograms (antisense strand). a Wild-type exon 9 sequenced with the 9-RS1 primer and the c.1634A > G mutation (arrow), causing a shift in the reading frame and a new peak at A (arrowhead), which serves as quality assurance. b Wild-type exon 9 sequenced with the 9-RS2 primer and the c.1624G > A mutation (arrow), causing a shift in the reading frame and a new peak at A (arrowhead). c Wild-type exon 9 sequenced with the 9-RS3 primer and the c.1633G > A mutation (arrow), causing a shift in the reading frame and new peaks (arrowheads). d Wild-type exon 20 sequenced with the exon 20 primer and the c.3139C > T mutation (arrow), causing a shift in the reading frame and a new peak at T (arrowhead). Wild-type exon 20 sequenced with the exon 20 primer and the c.3140A > G mutation (arrow), causing a shift in the reading frame and a new peak at G (arrowhead). Mut, mutant; WT, wild-type
PIK3CA mutational status and clinical features in gastric cancers
| Features | Total | PIK3CA mutation |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mutant | Wild-Type | |||
|
|
|
| ||
| Age (year) | 0.30 | |||
| Mean ± SE | 208 | 67.4 ± 2.1 | 69.8 ± 0.8 | |
| Sex | 0.41 | |||
| Male | 148 | 16 (11) | 132 (89) | |
| Female | 60 | 9 (15) | 51 (85) | |
| Location | 0.22 | |||
| Upper | 75 | 13 (17) | 62 (83) | |
| Middle | 65 | 6 (9) | 59 (91) | |
| Lower | 68 | 6 (9) | 62 (91) | |
| Tumor depth | 0.09 | |||
| T1 | 105 | 18 (17) | 87 (83) | |
| T2 | 29 | 2 (6) | 29 (94) | |
| T3 | 42 | 2 (5) | 42 (95) | |
| T4 | 25 | 3 (11) | 25 (89) | |
| Lymph node involvement | 0.73 | |||
| Absent | 135 | 17 (13) | 118 (87) | |
| Present | 73 | 8 (11) | 65 (83) | |
| Stage | 0.78 | |||
| I | 123 | 17 (14) | 106 (86) | |
| II | 40 | 4 (10) | 36 (90) | |
| III | 26 | 2 (8) | 24 (92) | |
| IV | 19 | 2 (11) | 17 (89) | |
| Lauren classification | 0.79 | |||
| Intestinal | 138 | 16 (12) | 122 (88) | |
| Diffuse | 70 | 9 (13) | 61 (87) | |
| Venous invasion | 0.05 | |||
| Absent | 111 | 18 (16) | 93 (84) | |
| Present | 95 | 7 (7) | 88 (93) | |
| Lymphatic invasion | 0.40 | |||
| Absent | 117 | 16 (14) | 101 (86) | |
| Present | 91 | 9 (10) | 82 (90) | |
| LINE-1 methylation level (%) | 0.19 | |||
| Mean ± SE | 208 | 74.9 ± 2.6 | 71.2 ± 1.0 | |
PIK3CA phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha, LINE-1 long interspersed nucleotide element-1, SE standard error
Fig. 2Kaplan–Meier curves showing the relationship of PIK3CA mutational status with overall survival (left) and disease-free survival (right) in gastric cancer patients
Fig. 3PIK3CA mutations and overall survival in various strata. The loge (adjusted HRs) plot of overall survival in the PIK3CA mutation vs. PIK3CA wild-type group. The 95 % CI is also shown
Previous studies of PIK3CA mutations in gastric cancer
| Sample number | Mutation rate | Exons evaluated | Method | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 163 | 5.5 % | 9 and 20 | Direct sequencing | [ |
| 263 | 16 % | 9 and 20 | Direct sequencing | [ |
| 12 | 25 % | 18 and 20 | Sanger method | [ |
| 47 | 11 % | 9 and 20 | ABI prism 377 automated sequencer | [ |
| 94 | 4.3 % | 9 and 20 | Direct sequencing | [ |
| 185 | 6.5 % | 9, 18 and 20 | PCR – SSCP | [ |
| 34 | 6.0 % | 9 and 20 | High-Resolution | [ |
| Melt Analysis | ||||
| 295 | 24 % | All exon | Mut Sig CV | [ |
| 140 | 4.0 % | 9 and 20 | ABI PRISM 3100 | [ |
| Genetic Analyzer | ||||
| 231 | 8.7 % | 1, 9 and 20 | Pyrosequencing | [ |
| 104 | 7.7 % | 9 and 20 | Direct sequencing | [ |
Studies on prognostic significance of PIK3CA mutations in several types of cancers
| Cancer type | Sample number | Mutation rate (%) | Mutation effect | Prognosis | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colon cancer | 1212 | 16 | Unfavorable | Adjusted CS HR | [ |
| 3.51 (1.28–9.62) | |||||
| 743 | 14.5 | Unfavorable | Adjusted OS HR | [ | |
| 3.30 (1.46–7.45) | |||||
| 450 | 18 | Unfavorable | Adjusted CS HR | [ | |
| 2.03 (1.15–3.57) | |||||
| Rectal cancer | 240 | 7.9 | Unfavorable | Adjusted RS HR | [ |
| 3.4 (1.2–9.2) | |||||
| Endometrial cancer | 1063 | 16.2 | Unfavorable | Not-adjusted RS HR | [ |
| 2.18 (1.09–4.39) | |||||
| Breast cancer | 687 | 25.3 | favorable | Not-adjusted CS HR | [ |
| 0.88 (0.58–1.34) | |||||
| 439 | 32.5 | Not significant | Adjusted CS HR | [ | |
| 0.7 (0.4–1.2) | |||||
| 188 | 28.7 | favorable | Adjusted RS HR | [ | |
| 0.42 (0.20–0.92) | |||||
| Esophageal cancer | 406 | 7.4 | Not significant | Adjusted OS HR | [ |
| 1.072 (0.79–1.44) | |||||
| 219 | 21 | favorable | Adjusted OS HR | [ | |
| 0.35 (0.10–0.90) | |||||
| Lung cancer | 1117 | 3.4 | Not significant | OS log-lank | [ |
|
| |||||
| 235 | 3.4 | Not significant | OS log-lank | [ | |
|
| |||||
| Gastric cancer | 263 | 15.9 | Not significant | Adjusted OS HR | [ |
| 1.1 (0.7–1.7) | |||||
| 231 | 8.7 | Not significant | Not-adjusted OS HR | [ | |
| 1.37 (0.68–3.26) | |||||
| 104 | 7.7 | Not significant | OS log-lank | [ | |
|
| |||||
| 208 | 12 | Not significant | Not-adjusted OS HR | This study | |
| 0.73 (0.58–2.57) |
HR hasard ratio, CS cancer specific survival, RS recurrence-free survival rate, OS overall survival rate