| Literature DB >> 27383682 |
Satoshi Hiraoka1, Ching-Chia Yang, Wataru Iwasaki.
Abstract
Metagenomic approaches are now commonly used in microbial ecology to study microbial communities in more detail, including many strains that cannot be cultivated in the laboratory. Bioinformatic analyses make it possible to mine huge metagenomic datasets and discover general patterns that govern microbial ecosystems. However, the findings of typical metagenomic and bioinformatic analyses still do not completely describe the ecology and evolution of microbes in their environments. Most analyses still depend on straightforward sequence similarity searches against reference databases. We herein review the current state of metagenomics and bioinformatics in microbial ecology and discuss future directions for the field. New techniques will allow us to go beyond routine analyses and broaden our knowledge of microbial ecosystems. We need to enrich reference databases, promote platforms that enable meta- or comprehensive analyses of diverse metagenomic datasets, devise methods that utilize long-read sequence information, and develop more powerful bioinformatic methods to analyze data from diverse perspectives.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27383682 PMCID: PMC5017796 DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.ME16024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbes Environ ISSN: 1342-6311 Impact factor: 2.912
Fig. 1Schematic figure of metagenomic and bioinformatic analyses in microbial ecology. The illustration covers topics that are already popular, that need further development, and that will become important in the future. At the bottom of the illustration, reference databases lay foundations for various bioinformatic analyses.
Fig. 2Schematic figures of genomic variations in environmental microbes. Each box represents a protein-coding gene, in which the letters indicate homology. Boxes and thick lines of different brightnesses represent genes and genomic fragments, respectively, that originated from different genomic areas or genomes. Dashed lines represent lost genes or expression. A: Types of genomic structural variations. B: Variations in regulatory sequences. Mutations (black dots) and the horizontal transfer of intergenic regulatory sequences (thick lines in black) both affect the strength of gene expression.