Literature DB >> 27381915

Experimental Analysis of Functional Variation within Protein Families: Receiver Domain Autodephosphorylation Kinetics.

Stephani C Page1, Robert M Immormino2, Thane H Miller2, Robert B Bourret2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Plants and microorganisms use two-component signal transduction systems (TCSs) to mediate responses to environmental stimuli. TCSs mediate responses through phosphotransfer from a conserved histidine on a sensor kinase to a conserved aspartate on the receiver domain of a response regulator. Typically, signal termination occurs through dephosphorylation of the receiver domain, which can catalyze its own dephosphorylation. Despite strong structural conservation between receiver domains, reported autodephosphorylation rate constants (kdephos) span a millionfold range. Variable receiver domain active-site residues D + 2 and T + 2 (two amino acids C terminal to conserved phosphorylation site and Thr/Ser, respectively) influence kdephos values, but the extent and mechanism of influence are unclear. We used sequence analysis of a large database of naturally occurring receiver domains to design mutant receiver domains for experimental analysis of autodephosphorylation kinetics. When combined with previous analyses, kdephos values were obtained for CheY variants that contained D + 2/T + 2 pairs found in 54% of receiver domain sequences. Tested pairs of amino acids at D + 2/T + 2 generally had similar effects on kdephos in CheY, PhoBN, or Spo0F. Acid or amide residues at D + 2/T + 2 enhanced kdephos CheY variants altered at D + 2/T + 2 exhibited rate constants for autophosphorylation with phosphoramidates and autodephosphorylation that were inversely correlated, suggesting that D + 2/T + 2 residues interact with aspects of the ground or transition states that differ between the two reactions. kdephos of CheY variants altered at D + 2/T + 2 correlated significantly with kdephos of wild-type receiver domains containing the same D + 2/T + 2 pair. Additionally, particular D + 2/T + 2 pairs were enriched in different response regulator subfamilies, suggesting functional significance. IMPORTANCE: One protein family, defined by a conserved domain, can include hundreds of thousands of known members. Characterizing conserved residues within a conserved domain can identify functions shared by all family members. However, a general strategy to assess features that differ between members of a family is lacking. Fully exploring the impact of just two variable positions within a conserved domain could require assessment of 400 (i.e., 20 × 20) variants. Instead, we created and analyzed a nonredundant database of receiver domain sequences. Five percent of D + 2/T + 2 pairs were sufficient to represent 50% of receiver domain sequences. Using protein sequence analysis to prioritize mutant choice made it experimentally feasible to extensively probe the influence of positions D + 2 and T + 2 on receiver domain autodephosphorylation kinetics.
Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27381915      PMCID: PMC4999930          DOI: 10.1128/JB.00853-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  33 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Histidine kinases and response regulator proteins in two-component signaling systems.

Authors:  A H West; A M Stock
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 13.807

3.  Evolutionary genomics of the HAD superfamily: understanding the structural adaptations and catalytic diversity in a superfamily of phosphoesterases and allied enzymes.

Authors:  A Maxwell Burroughs; Karen N Allen; Debra Dunaway-Mariano; L Aravind
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 4.  Receiver domain structure and function in response regulator proteins.

Authors:  Robert B Bourret
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 7.934

Review 5.  Structural conservation in the CheY superfamily.

Authors:  K Volz
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1993-11-09       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Signal processing times in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  J E Segall; M D Manson; H C Berg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-04-29       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Diversity of structure and function of response regulator output domains.

Authors:  Michael Y Galperin
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 7.934

8.  Nonconserved active site residues modulate CheY autophosphorylation kinetics and phosphodonor preference.

Authors:  Stephanie A Thomas; Robert M Immormino; Robert B Bourret; Ruth E Silversmith
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Sequence and function of LuxU: a two-component phosphorelay protein that regulates quorum sensing in Vibrio harveyi.

Authors:  J A Freeman; B L Bassler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  The MiST2 database: a comprehensive genomics resource on microbial signal transduction.

Authors:  Luke E Ulrich; Igor B Zhulin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  8 in total

1.  Mechanism of metal ion-induced activation of a two-component sensor kinase.

Authors:  Trisiani Affandi; Megan M McEvoy
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  Modulation of Response Regulator CheY Reaction Kinetics by Two Variable Residues That Affect Conformation.

Authors:  Philip B Straughn; Luke R Vass; Chase Yuan; Emily N Kennedy; Clay A Foster; Robert B Bourret
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Generalizable strategy to analyze domains in the context of parent protein architecture: A CheW case study.

Authors:  Luke R Vass; Katie M Branscum; Robert B Bourret; Clay A Foster
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2022-06-20

4.  Regulation of signaling directionality revealed by 3D snapshots of a kinase:regulator complex in action.

Authors:  Felipe Trajtenberg; Juan A Imelio; Matías R Machado; Nicole Larrieux; Marcelo A Marti; Gonzalo Obal; Ariel E Mechaly; Alejandro Buschiazzo
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Phospho-dependent signaling during the general stress response by the atypical response regulator and ClpXP adaptor RssB.

Authors:  Jacob Schwartz; Jonghyeon Son; Christiane Brugger; Alexandra M Deaconescu
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Role of Position K+4 in the Phosphorylation and Dephosphorylation Reaction Kinetics of the CheY Response Regulator.

Authors:  Clay A Foster; Ruth E Silversmith; Robert M Immormino; Luke R Vass; Emily N Kennedy; Yael Pazy; Edward J Collins; Robert B Bourret
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.321

7.  A Single-Domain Response Regulator Functions as an Integrating Hub To Coordinate General Stress Response and Development in Alphaproteobacteria.

Authors:  A Kaczmarczyk; I de Jong; C Lori; U Jenal
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 7.867

8.  Predicted Functional and Structural Diversity of Receiver Domains in Fungal Two-Component Regulatory Systems.

Authors:  Robert B Bourret; Clay A Foster; William E Goldman
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.389

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.