Literature DB >> 32424010

Modulation of Response Regulator CheY Reaction Kinetics by Two Variable Residues That Affect Conformation.

Philip B Straughn1, Luke R Vass1, Chase Yuan1, Emily N Kennedy1, Clay A Foster1, Robert B Bourret2.   

Abstract

Microorganisms and plants utilize two-component systems to regulate adaptive responses to changing environmental conditions. Sensor kinases detect stimuli and alter their autophosphorylation activity accordingly. Signal propagation occurs via the transfer of phosphoryl groups from upstream kinases to downstream response regulator proteins. Removal of phosphoryl groups from the response regulator typically resets the system. Members of the same protein family may catalyze phosphorylation and dephosphorylation reactions with different efficiencies, exhibiting rate constants spanning many orders of magnitude to accommodate response time scales from milliseconds to days. We previously found that variable positions one or two residues to the C-terminal side of the conserved Asp phosphorylation site (D+2) or Thr/Ser (T+1/T+2) in response regulators alter reaction kinetics by direct interaction with phosphodonor or phosphoacceptor molecules. Here, we explore the kinetic effects of amino acid substitutions at the two positions immediately C-terminal to the conserved Lys (K+1/K+2) in the model Escherichia coli response regulator CheY. We measured CheY autophosphorylation and autodephosphorylation rate constants for 27 pairs of K+1/K+2 residues that represent 84% of naturally occurring response regulators. Effects on autodephosphorylation were modest, but autophosphorylation rate constants varied by 2 orders of magnitude, suggesting that the K+1/K+2 positions influence reaction kinetics by altering the conformational spectrum sampled by CheY at equilibrium. Additional evidence supporting this indirect mechanism includes the following: the effect on autophosphorylation rate constants is independent of the phosphodonor, the autophosphorylation rate constants and dissociation constants for the phosphoryl group analog BeF3 - are inversely correlated, and the K+1/K+2 positions are distant from the phosphorylation site.IMPORTANCE We have identified five variable positions in response regulators that allow the rate constants of autophosphorylation and autodephosporylation reactions each to be altered over 3 orders of magnitude in CheY. The distributions of variable residue combinations across response regulator subfamilies suggest that distinct mechanisms associated with different variable positions allow reaction rates to be tuned independently during evolution for diverse biological purposes. This knowledge could be used in synthetic-biology applications to adjust the properties (e.g., background noise and response duration) of biosensors and may allow prediction of response regulator reaction kinetics from the primary amino acid sequence.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CheY; autodephosphorylation; autophosphorylation; receiver domain; response regulator; two-component systems

Year:  2020        PMID: 32424010      PMCID: PMC7348551          DOI: 10.1128/JB.00089-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  90 in total

1.  Measurement of response regulator autodephosphorylation rates spanning six orders of magnitude.

Authors:  Robert B Bourret; Stephanie A Thomas; Stephani C Page; Rachel L Creager-Allen; Aaron M Moore; Ruth E Silversmith
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  Phosphorylation of bacterial response regulator proteins by low molecular weight phospho-donors.

Authors:  G S Lukat; W R McCleary; A M Stock; J B Stock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-01-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Two-Component Sensing and Regulation: How Do Histidine Kinases Talk with Response Regulators at the Molecular Level?

Authors:  Alejandro Buschiazzo; Felipe Trajtenberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 15.500

Review 4.  Temporal and evolutionary dynamics of two-component signaling pathways.

Authors:  Michael E Salazar; Michael T Laub
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 7.934

5.  Fluorescence Measurement of Kinetics of CheY Autophosphorylation with Small Molecule Phosphodonors.

Authors:  Ruth E Silversmith; Robert B Bourret
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2018

Review 6.  Receiver domain structure and function in response regulator proteins.

Authors:  Robert B Bourret
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 7.934

7.  Regulation of response regulator autophosphorylation through interdomain contacts.

Authors:  Christopher M Barbieri; Timothy R Mack; Victoria L Robinson; Matthew T Miller; Ann M Stock
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  A bifunctional kinase-phosphatase in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Steven L Porter; Mark A J Roberts; Cerys S Manning; Judith P Armitage
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Optogenetic control of Bacillus subtilis gene expression.

Authors:  Sebastian M Castillo-Hair; Elliot A Baerman; Masaya Fujita; Oleg A Igoshin; Jeffrey J Tabor
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  The Pfam protein families database in 2019.

Authors:  Sara El-Gebali; Jaina Mistry; Alex Bateman; Sean R Eddy; Aurélien Luciani; Simon C Potter; Matloob Qureshi; Lorna J Richardson; Gustavo A Salazar; Alfredo Smart; Erik L L Sonnhammer; Layla Hirsh; Lisanna Paladin; Damiano Piovesan; Silvio C E Tosatto; Robert D Finn
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  6 in total

1.  Reconstitution of an intact clock reveals mechanisms of circadian timekeeping.

Authors:  Archana G Chavan; Jeffrey A Swan; Joel Heisler; Cigdem Sancar; Dustin C Ernst; Mingxu Fang; Joseph G Palacios; Rebecca K Spangler; Clive R Bagshaw; Sarvind Tripathi; Priya Crosby; Susan S Golden; Carrie L Partch; Andy LiWang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Generalizable strategy to analyze domains in the context of parent protein architecture: A CheW case study.

Authors:  Luke R Vass; Katie M Branscum; Robert B Bourret; Clay A Foster
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2022-06-20

3.  Azorhizobium caulinodans Chemotaxis Is Controlled by an Unusual Phosphorelay Network.

Authors:  Emily N Kennedy; Sarah A Barr; Xiaolin Liu; Luke R Vass; Yanan Liu; Zhihong Xie; Robert B Bourret
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.476

4.  Phospho-dependent signaling during the general stress response by the atypical response regulator and ClpXP adaptor RssB.

Authors:  Jacob Schwartz; Jonghyeon Son; Christiane Brugger; Alexandra M Deaconescu
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Role of Position K+4 in the Phosphorylation and Dephosphorylation Reaction Kinetics of the CheY Response Regulator.

Authors:  Clay A Foster; Ruth E Silversmith; Robert M Immormino; Luke R Vass; Emily N Kennedy; Yael Pazy; Edward J Collins; Robert B Bourret
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.321

6.  Predicted Functional and Structural Diversity of Receiver Domains in Fungal Two-Component Regulatory Systems.

Authors:  Robert B Bourret; Clay A Foster; William E Goldman
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.389

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.