Literature DB >> 34167303

Role of Position K+4 in the Phosphorylation and Dephosphorylation Reaction Kinetics of the CheY Response Regulator.

Clay A Foster1, Ruth E Silversmith1, Robert M Immormino1, Luke R Vass1, Emily N Kennedy1, Yael Pazy1, Edward J Collins1, Robert B Bourret1.   

Abstract

Two-component signaling is a primary method by which microorganisms interact with their environments. A kinase detects stimuli and modulates autophosphorylation activity. The signal propagates by phosphotransfer from the kinase to a response regulator, eliciting a response. Response regulators operate over a range of time scales, corresponding to their related biological processes. Response regulator active site chemistry is highly conserved, but certain variable residues can influence phosphorylation kinetics. An Ala-to-Pro substitution (K+4, residue 113) in the Escherichia coli response regulator CheY triggers a constitutively active phenotype; however, the A113P substitution is too far from the active site to directly affect phosphochemistry. To better understand the activating mechanism(s) of the substitution, we analyzed receiver domain sequences to characterize the evolutionary role of the K+4 position. Although most featured Pro, Leu, Ile, and Val residues, chemotaxis-related proteins exhibited atypical Ala, Gly, Asp, and Glu residues at K+4. Structural and in silico analyses revealed that CheY A113P adopted a partially active configuration. Biochemical data showed that A113P shifted CheY toward a more activated state, enhancing autophosphorylation. By characterizing CheY variants, we determined that this functionality was transmitted through a hydrophobic network bounded by the β5α5 loop and the α1 helix of CheY. This region also interacts with the phosphodonor CheAP1, suggesting that binding generates an activating perturbation similar to the A113P substitution. Atypical residues like Ala at the K+4 position likely serve two purposes. First, restricting autophosphorylation may minimize background noise generated by intracellular phosphodonors such as acetyl phosphate. Second, optimizing interactions with upstream partners may help prime the receiver domain for phosphorylation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34167303      PMCID: PMC8476072          DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.321


  101 in total

1.  Identification of the binding interfaces on CheY for two of its targets, the phosphatase CheZ and the flagellar switch protein fliM.

Authors:  M M McEvoy; A Bren; M Eisenbach; F W Dahlquist
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-06-25       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis.

Authors:  Eric F Pettersen; Thomas D Goddard; Conrad C Huang; Gregory S Couch; Daniel M Greenblatt; Elaine C Meng; Thomas E Ferrin
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Phosphorylation of bacterial response regulator proteins by low molecular weight phospho-donors.

Authors:  G S Lukat; W R McCleary; A M Stock; J B Stock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-01-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Phosphorylation assays for proteins of the two-component regulatory system controlling chemotaxis in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J F Hess; R B Bourret; M I Simon
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.600

5.  Protein phosphorylation is involved in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  J F Hess; K Oosawa; P Matsumura; M I Simon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Receiver domain structure and function in response regulator proteins.

Authors:  Robert B Bourret
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 7.934

7.  Allosteric Control of a Plant Receptor Kinase through S-Glutathionylation.

Authors:  Alexander S Moffett; Kyle W Bender; Steven C Huber; Diwakar Shukla
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Localized perturbations in CheY structure monitored by NMR identify a CheA binding interface.

Authors:  R V Swanson; D F Lowry; P Matsumura; M M McEvoy; M I Simon; F W Dahlquist
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1995-10

9.  Two variable active site residues modulate response regulator phosphoryl group stability.

Authors:  Stephanie A Thomas; Jocelyn A Brewster; Robert B Bourret
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.501

10.  Use of restrained molecular dynamics to predict the conformations of phosphorylated receiver domains in two-component signaling systems.

Authors:  Clay A Foster; Ann H West
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-11-20
View more
  1 in total

1.  Predicted Functional and Structural Diversity of Receiver Domains in Fungal Two-Component Regulatory Systems.

Authors:  Robert B Bourret; Clay A Foster; William E Goldman
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.389

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.