Literature DB >> 27381324

Commercial chicken breeds exhibit highly divergent patterns of linkage disequilibrium.

R J Pengelly1, A A Gheyas2, R Kuo2, E Mossotto1, E G Seaby1, D W Burt2, S Ennis1, A Collins1.   

Abstract

The analysis of linkage disequilibrium (LD) underpins the development of effective genotyping technologies, trait mapping and understanding of biological mechanisms such as those driving recombination and the impact of selection. We apply the Malécot-Morton model of LD to create additive LD maps that describe the high-resolution LD landscape of commercial chickens. We investigated LD in chickens (Gallus gallus) at the highest resolution to date for broiler, white egg and brown egg layer commercial lines. There is minimal concordance between breeds of fine-scale LD patterns (correlation coefficient <0.21), and even between discrete broiler lines. Regions of LD breakdown, which may align with recombination hot spots, are enriched near CpG islands and transcription start sites (P<2.2 × 10-16), consistent with recent evidence described in finches, but concordance in hot spot locations between commercial breeds is only marginally greater than random. As in other birds, functional elements in the chicken genome are associated with recombination but, unlike evidence from other bird species, the LD landscape is not stable in the populations studied. The development of optimal genotyping panels for genome-led selection programmes will depend on careful analysis of the LD structure of each line of interest. Further study is required to fully elucidate the mechanisms underlying highly divergent LD patterns found in commercial chickens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27381324      PMCID: PMC5061916          DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2016.47

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  39 in total

1.  dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation.

Authors:  S T Sherry; M H Ward; M Kholodov; J Baker; L Phan; E M Smigielski; K Sirotkin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Allelic association discriminates draft orders.

Authors:  S Ennis; A Collins; W Tapper; A Murray; J N MacPherson; N E Morton
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.670

3.  The first linkage disequilibrium (LD) maps: delineation of hot and cold blocks by diplotype analysis.

Authors:  N Maniatis; A Collins; C F Xu; L C McCarthy; D R Hewett; W Tapper; S Ennis; X Ke; N E Morton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A high-density SNP-based linkage map of the chicken genome reveals sequence features correlated with recombination rate.

Authors:  Martien A M Groenen; Per Wahlberg; Mario Foglio; Hans H Cheng; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Francois Besnier; Mark Lathrop; William M Muir; Gane Ka-Shu Wong; Ivo Gut; Leif Andersson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Exome-based linkage disequilibrium maps of individual genes: functional clustering and relationship to disease.

Authors:  Jane Gibson; William Tapper; Sarah Ennis; Andrew Collins
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-11-04       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Regional differences in recombination hotspots between two chicken populations.

Authors:  Martin G Elferink; Pieter van As; Tineke Veenendaal; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Martien A M Groenen
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 2.797

7.  Accelerated evolution of the Prdm9 speciation gene across diverse metazoan taxa.

Authors:  Peter L Oliver; Leo Goodstadt; Joshua J Bayes; Zoë Birtle; Kevin C Roach; Nitin Phadnis; Scott A Beatson; Gerton Lunter; Harmit S Malik; Chris P Ponting
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Whole genome sequences are required to fully resolve the linkage disequilibrium structure of human populations.

Authors:  Reuben J Pengelly; William Tapper; Jane Gibson; Marcin Knut; Rick Tearle; Andrew Collins; Sarah Ennis
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  The UCSC Genome Browser database: 2014 update.

Authors:  Donna Karolchik; Galt P Barber; Jonathan Casper; Hiram Clawson; Melissa S Cline; Mark Diekhans; Timothy R Dreszer; Pauline A Fujita; Luvina Guruvadoo; Maximilian Haeussler; Rachel A Harte; Steve Heitner; Angie S Hinrichs; Katrina Learned; Brian T Lee; Chin H Li; Brian J Raney; Brooke Rhead; Kate R Rosenbloom; Cricket A Sloan; Matthew L Speir; Ann S Zweig; David Haussler; Robert M Kuhn; W James Kent
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Third Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2015.

Authors:  Michael Schmid; Jacqueline Smith; David W Burt; Bronwen L Aken; Parker B Antin; Alan L Archibald; Chris Ashwell; Perry J Blackshear; Clarissa Boschiero; C Titus Brown; Shane C Burgess; Hans H Cheng; William Chow; Derrick J Coble; Amanda Cooksey; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Joana Damas; Richard V N Davis; Dirk-Jan de Koning; Mary E Delany; Thomas Derrien; Takele T Desta; Ian C Dunn; Matthew Dunn; Hans Ellegren; Lél Eöry; Ionas Erb; Marta Farré; Mario Fasold; Damarius Fleming; Paul Flicek; Katie E Fowler; Laure Frésard; David P Froman; Valerie Garceau; Paul P Gardner; Almas A Gheyas; Darren K Griffin; Martien A M Groenen; Thomas Haaf; Olivier Hanotte; Alan Hart; Julien Häsler; S Blair Hedges; Jana Hertel; Kerstin Howe; Allen Hubbard; David A Hume; Pete Kaiser; Darek Kedra; Stephen J Kemp; Christophe Klopp; Kalmia E Kniel; Richard Kuo; Sandrine Lagarrigue; Susan J Lamont; Denis M Larkin; Raman A Lawal; Sarah M Markland; Fiona McCarthy; Heather A McCormack; Marla C McPherson; Akira Motegi; Stefan A Muljo; Andrea Münsterberg; Rishi Nag; Indrajit Nanda; Michael Neuberger; Anne Nitsche; Cedric Notredame; Harry Noyes; Rebecca O'Connor; Elizabeth A O'Hare; Andrew J Oler; Sheila C Ommeh; Helio Pais; Michael Persia; Frédérique Pitel; Likit Preeyanon; Pablo Prieto Barja; Elizabeth M Pritchett; Douglas D Rhoads; Charmaine M Robinson; Michael N Romanov; Max Rothschild; Pierre-François Roux; Carl J Schmidt; Alisa-Sophia Schneider; Matthew G Schwartz; Steve M Searle; Michael A Skinner; Craig A Smith; Peter F Stadler; Tammy E Steeves; Claus Steinlein; Liang Sun; Minoru Takata; Igor Ulitsky; Qing Wang; Ying Wang; Wesley C Warren; Jonathan M D Wood; David Wragg; Huaijun Zhou
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 1.636

View more
  4 in total

1.  Analysis of the Progeny of Sibling Matings Reveals Regulatory Variation Impacting the Transcriptome of Immune Cells in Commercial Chickens.

Authors:  Lucy Freem; Kim M Summers; Almas A Gheyas; Androniki Psifidi; Kay Boulton; Amanda MacCallum; Rakhi Harne; Jenny O'Dell; Stephen J Bush; David A Hume
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 2.  On the Extent of Linkage Disequilibrium in the Genome of Farm Animals.

Authors:  Saber Qanbari
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Molecular mechanisms for environmentally induced and evolutionarily rapid redistribution (plasticity) of meiotic recombination.

Authors:  Reine U Protacio; Tresor O Mukiza; Mari K Davidson; Wayne P Wahls
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  The feather pattern autosomal barring in chicken is strongly associated with segregation at the MC1R locus.

Authors:  Doreen Schwochow; Susanne Bornelöv; Tingxing Jiang; Jingyi Li; David Gourichon; Bertrand Bed'Hom; Ben J Dorshorst; Cheng-Ming Chuong; Michèle Tixier-Boichard; Leif Andersson
Journal:  Pigment Cell Melanoma Res       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 4.693

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.