Literature DB >> 2737674

Sequencing of megabase plus DNA by hybridization: theory of the method.

R Drmanac1, I Labat, I Brukner, R Crkvenjakov.   

Abstract

A mismatch-free hybridization of oligonucleotides containing from 11 to 20 monomers to unknown DNA represents, in essence, a sequencing of a complementary target. Realizing this, we have used probability calculations and, in part, computer simulations to estimate the types and numbers of oligonucleotides that would have to be synthesized in order to sequence a megabase plus segment of DNA. We estimate that 95,000 specific mixes of 11-mers, mainly of the 5'(A,T,C,G)(A,T,C,G)N8(A,T,C,G)3' type, hybridized consecutively to dot blots of cloned genomic DNA fragments would provide primary data for the sequence assembly. An optimal mixture of representative libraries in M13 vector, having inserts of (i) 7 kb, (ii) 0.5 kb genomic fragments randomly ligated in up to 10-kb inserts, and (iii) tandem "jumping" fragments 100 kb apart in the genome, will be needed. To sequence each million base pairs of DNA, one would need hybridization data from about 2100 separate hybridization sample dots. Inevitable gaps and uncertainties in alignment of sequenced fragments arising from nonrandom or repetitive sequence organization of complex genomes and difficulties in cloning "poisonous" sequences in Escherichia coli, inherent to large sequencing by any method, have been considered and minimized by choice of libraries and number of subclones used for hybridization. Because it is based on simpler biochemical procedures, our method is inherently easier to automate than existing sequencing methods. The sequence can be derived from simple primary data only by extensive computing. Phased experimental tests and computer simulations increasing in complexity are needed before accurate estimates can be made in terms of cost and speed of sequencing by the new approach. Nevertheless, sequencing by hybridization should show advantages over existing methods because of the inherent redundancy and parallelism in its data gathering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2737674     DOI: 10.1016/0888-7543(89)90290-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genomics        ISSN: 0888-7543            Impact factor:   5.736


  50 in total

Review 1.  Mutational analysis using oligonucleotide microarrays.

Authors:  J G Hacia; F S Collins
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Secondary structure prediction and structure-specific sequence analysis of single-stranded DNA.

Authors:  F Dong; H T Allawi; T Anderson; B P Neri; V I Lyamichev
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  An Eulerian path approach to DNA fragment assembly.

Authors:  P A Pevzner; H Tang; M S Waterman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Modification of DNA duplexes to smooth their thermal stability independently of their base content for DNA sequencing by hybridization.

Authors:  H K Nguyen; P Auffray; U Asseline; D Dupret; N T Thuong
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 5.  Gene expression profiling with DNA microarrays: advancing our understanding of psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Julie Pongrac; Frank A Middleton; David A Lewis; Pat Levitt; Károly Mirnics
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.996

6.  Microfluidic device reads up to four consecutive base pairs in DNA sequencing-by-synthesis.

Authors:  Emil P Kartalov; Stephen R Quake
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  A multi-enzyme model for Pyrosequencing.

Authors:  Ali Agah; Mariam Aghajan; Foad Mashayekhi; Sasan Amini; Ronald W Davis; James D Plummer; Mostafa Ronaghi; Peter B Griffin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  Long-range walking techniques in positional cloning strategies.

Authors:  L Stubbs
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.957

9.  Identification of non-specific hybridization using an empirical equation fitted to non-equilibrium dissociation curves.

Authors:  Samuel W Baushke; Robert D Stedtfeld; Dieter M Tourlousse; Farhan Ahmad; Lukas M Wick; Erdogan Gulari; James M Tiedje; Syed A Hashsham
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 2.363

10.  How is the Human Genome Project doing, and what have we learned so far?

Authors:  M S Guyer; F S Collins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.