Annemarie G Hirsch1, J B Jones2, Virginia R Lerch3, Xiaoqin Tang4, Andrea Berger1, Deserae N Clark5, Walter F Stewart2. 1. Center for Health Research, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania. 2. Research Development and Dissemination, Sutter Health, San Francisco, California. 3. Institute for Advanced Applications, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania. 4. Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 5. Department of Clinical Innovation, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We describe how electronic health record (EHR) audit files can be used to understand how time is spent in primary care (PC). MATERIALS/ METHODS: We used audit file data from the Geisinger Clinic to quantify elements of the clinical workflow and to determine how these times vary by patient and encounter factors. We randomly selected audit file records representing 36 437 PC encounters across 26 clinic locations. Audit file data were used to estimate duration and variance of: (1) time in the waiting room, (2) nurse time with the patient, (3) time in the exam room without a nurse or physician, and (4) physician time with the patient. Multivariate modeling was used to test for differences by patient and by encounter features. RESULTS: On average, a PC encounter took 54.6 minutes, with 5 minutes of nurse time, 15.5 minutes of physician time, and the remaining 62% of the time spent waiting to see a clinician or check out. Older age, female sex, and chronic disease were associated with longer wait times and longer time with clinicians. Level of service and numbers of medications, procedures, and lab orders were associated with longer time with clinicians. Late check-in and same-day visits were associated with shorter wait time and clinician time. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insights on uses of audit file data for workflow analysis during PC encounters. DISCUSSION: Scalable ways to quantify clinical encounter workflow elements may provide the means to develop more efficient approaches to care and improve the patient experience.
OBJECTIVE: We describe how electronic health record (EHR) audit files can be used to understand how time is spent in primary care (PC). MATERIALS/ METHODS: We used audit file data from the Geisinger Clinic to quantify elements of the clinical workflow and to determine how these times vary by patient and encounter factors. We randomly selected audit file records representing 36 437 PC encounters across 26 clinic locations. Audit file data were used to estimate duration and variance of: (1) time in the waiting room, (2) nurse time with the patient, (3) time in the exam room without a nurse or physician, and (4) physician time with the patient. Multivariate modeling was used to test for differences by patient and by encounter features. RESULTS: On average, a PC encounter took 54.6 minutes, with 5 minutes of nurse time, 15.5 minutes of physician time, and the remaining 62% of the time spent waiting to see a clinician or check out. Older age, female sex, and chronic disease were associated with longer wait times and longer time with clinicians. Level of service and numbers of medications, procedures, and lab orders were associated with longer time with clinicians. Late check-in and same-day visits were associated with shorter wait time and clinician time. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insights on uses of audit file data for workflow analysis during PC encounters. DISCUSSION: Scalable ways to quantify clinical encounter workflow elements may provide the means to develop more efficient approaches to care and improve the patient experience.
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Sonja Boone; Litjen Tan; Lotte N Dyrbye; Wayne Sotile; Daniel Satele; Colin P West; Jeff Sloan; Michael R Oreskovich Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2012-10-08
Authors: James D Ralston; Katie Coleman; Robert J Reid; Matthew R Handley; Eric B Larson Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: David K Vawdrey; Lauren G Wilcox; Sarah Collins; Steven Feiner; Olena Mamykina; Daniel M Stein; Suzanne Bakken; Matthew R Fred; Peter D Stetson Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2011 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Michelle R Hribar; Sarah Read-Brown; Isaac H Goldstein; Leah G Reznick; Lorinna Lombardi; Mansi Parikh; Winston Chamberlain; Michael F Chiang Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Mark V Mai; Evan W Orenstein; John D Manning; Anthony A Luberti; Adam C Dziorny Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2020-06-24 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Azraa Amroze; Terry S Field; Hassan Fouayzi; Devi Sundaresan; Laura Burns; Lawrence Garber; Rajani S Sadasivam; Kathleen M Mazor; Jerry H Gurwitz; Sarah L Cutrona Journal: JMIR Med Inform Date: 2019-02-07
Authors: Jordan G Nestor; Alexander Fedotov; David Fasel; Maddalena Marasa; Hila Milo-Rasouly; Julia Wynn; Wendy K Chung; Ali Gharavi; George Hripcsak; Suzanne Bakken; Soumitra Sengupta; Chunhua Weng Journal: JAMIA Open Date: 2021-03-01