Literature DB >> 27375292

A framework for evaluating electronic health record vendor user-centered design and usability testing processes.

Raj M Ratwani1,2, A Zachary Hettinger1,2, Allison Kosydar1, Rollin J Fairbanks1,2, Michael L Hodgkins3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Currently, there are few resources for electronic health record (EHR) purchasers and end users to understand the usability processes employed by EHR vendors during product design and development. We developed a framework, based on human factors literature and industry standards, to systematically evaluate the user-centered design processes and usability testing methods used by EHR vendors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed current usability certification requirements and the human factors literature to develop a 15-point framework for evaluating EHR products. The framework is based on 3 dimensions: user-centered design process, summative testing methodology, and summative testing results. Two vendor usability reports were retrieved from the Office of the National Coordinator's Certified Health IT Product List and were evaluated using the framework.
RESULTS: One vendor scored low on the framework (5 pts) while the other vendor scored high on the framework (15 pts). The 2 scored vendor reports demonstrate the framework's ability to discriminate between the variabilities in vendor processes and to determine which vendors are meeting best practices. DISCUSSION: The framework provides a method to more easily comprehend EHR vendors' usability processes and serves to highlight where EHR vendors may be falling short in terms of best practices. The framework provides a greater level of transparency for both purchasers and end users of EHRs.
CONCLUSION: The framework highlights the need for clearer certification requirements and suggests that the authorized certification bodies that examine vendor usability reports may need to be provided with clearer guidance.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Keywords:  electronic health records; health information technology; human factors; usability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27375292      PMCID: PMC7651938          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocw092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  11 in total

1.  Beyond the five-user assumption: benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing.

Authors:  Laura Faulkner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2003-08

2.  Electronic Health Record Vendor Adherence to Usability Certification Requirements and Testing Standards.

Authors:  Raj M Ratwani; Natalie C Benda; A Zachary Hettinger; Rollin J Fairbanks
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Emergency Physician Task Switching Increases With the Introduction of a Commercial Electronic Health Record.

Authors:  Natalie C Benda; Margaret L Meadors; A Zachary Hettinger; Raj M Ratwani
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.721

4.  Physician and nurse satisfaction with an Electronic Medical Record system.

Authors:  Antonios Likourezos; Donald B Chalfin; Daniel G Murphy; Barbara Sommer; Kelly Darcy; Steven J Davidson
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.484

5.  Usability testing in medical informatics: cognitive approaches to evaluation of information systems and user interfaces.

Authors:  A W Kushniruk; V L Patel; J J Cimino
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1997

6.  Electronic health record usability: analysis of the user-centered design processes of eleven electronic health record vendors.

Authors:  Raj M Ratwani; Rollin J Fairbanks; A Zachary Hettinger; Natalie C Benda
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Factors Affecting Physician Professional Satisfaction and Their Implications for Patient Care, Health Systems, and Health Policy.

Authors:  Mark W Friedberg; Peggy G Chen; Kristin R Van Busum; Frances Aunon; Chau Pham; John Caloyeras; Soeren Mattke; Emma Pitchforth; Denise D Quigley; Robert H Brook; F Jay Crosson; Michael Tutty
Journal:  Rand Health Q       Date:  2014-12-01

8.  Health information technology: standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for electronic health record technology, 2014 edition; revisions to the permanent certification program for health information technology. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2012-09-04

9.  Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems.

Authors:  Andre W Kushniruk; Vimla L Patel
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.317

10.  An analysis of electronic health record-related patient safety concerns.

Authors:  Derek W Meeks; Michael W Smith; Lesley Taylor; Dean F Sittig; Jean M Scott; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  5 in total

1.  We're Lost, But We are Making Good Time: Navigating Complex Pathways in a Patient-Order Management Task.

Authors:  Benjamin J Duncan; Alexandra N Kassis; David R Kaufman; Adela Grando; Karl A Poterack; Rick A Helmers; Timothy K Miksch; Lu Zheng; Bradley N Doebbeling
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2021-01-25

Review 2.  Mind the Gap. A systematic review to identify usability and safety challenges and practices during electronic health record implementation.

Authors:  Raj Ratwani; Terry Fairbanks; Erica Savage; Katie Adams; Michael Wittie; Edna Boone; Andrew Hayden; Janey Barnes; Zach Hettinger; Andrew Gettinger
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Toward More Proactive Approaches to Safety in the Electronic Health Record Era.

Authors:  Dean F Sittig; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2017-08-30

4.  Methodological Quality of Manuscripts Reporting on the Usability of Mobile Applications for Pain Assessment and Management: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ana F Almeida; Nelson P Rocha; Anabela G Silva
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Perceived Electronic Health Record Usability as a Predictor of Task Load and Burnout Among US Physicians: Mediation Analysis.

Authors:  Edward R Melnick; Elizabeth Harry; Christine A Sinsky; Liselotte N Dyrbye; Hanhan Wang; Mickey Todd Trockel; Colin P West; Tait Shanafelt
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 5.428

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.