Literature DB >> 14587545

Beyond the five-user assumption: benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing.

Laura Faulkner1.   

Abstract

It is widely assumed that 5 participants suffice for usability testing. In this study, 60 users were tested and random sets of 5 or more were sampled from the whole, to demonstrate the risks of using only 5 participants and the benefits of using more. Some of the randomly selected sets of 5 participants found 99% of the problems; other sets found only 55%. With 10 users, the lowest percentage of problems revealed by any one set was increased to 80%, and with 20 users, to 95%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14587545     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput        ISSN: 0743-3808


  135 in total

1.  Usability Testing of a Web-Based Decision Aid for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Among Multi-Ethnic Women.

Authors:  Austin M Coe; William Ueng; Jennifer M Vargas; Raven David; Alejandro Vanegas; Katherine Infante; Meghna Trivedi; Haeseung Yi; Jill Dimond; Katherine D Crew; Rita Kukafka
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2017-02-10

2.  Engaging youth about gambling using the internet: The YouthBet.net website.

Authors:  David Korn; Martha Murray; Meg Morrison; Jennifer Reynolds; Harvey A Skinner
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec

3.  Six habits of highly successful health information technology: powerful strategies for design and implementation.

Authors:  Jessica M Ray; Raj M Ratwani; Christine A Sinsky; Richard M Frankel; Mark W Friedberg; Seth M Powsner; David I Rosenthal; Robert M Wachter; Edward R Melnick
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  A Multi-step Usability Evaluation of a Self-Management App to Support Medication Adherence in Persons Living with HIV.

Authors:  Melissa Beauchemin; Melissa Gradilla; Dawon Baik; Hwayoung Cho; Rebecca Schnall
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.046

5.  Evaluating a Modular Decision Support Application For Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Laura G Militello; Julie B Diiulio; Morgan R Borders; Christen E Sushereba; Jason J Saleem; Donald Haverkamp; Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.342

6.  A hand exercise mobile app for people with rheumatoid arthritis in Turkey: design, development and usability study.

Authors:  Eda Tonga; Esther Williamson; Cynthia Srikesavan; Tuğçe Özen; Fatih Sarıtaş; Sarah E Lamb
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2021-04-18       Impact factor: 2.631

7.  A user-centered model for designing consumer mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps).

Authors:  Rebecca Schnall; Marlene Rojas; Suzanne Bakken; William Brown; Alex Carballo-Dieguez; Monique Carry; Deborah Gelaude; Jocelyn Patterson Mosley; Jasmine Travers
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 6.317

8.  Development and usability testing of a web-based cancer symptom and quality-of-life support intervention.

Authors:  S E Wolpin; B Halpenny; G Whitman; J McReynolds; M Stewart; W B Lober; D L Berry
Journal:  Health Informatics J       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  A comparison of usability factors of four mobile devices for accessing healthcare information by adolescents.

Authors:  B Sheehan; Y Lee; M Rodriguez; V Tiase; R Schnall
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.342

10.  +CLICK: harnessing web-based training to reduce secondary transmission among HIV-positive youth.

Authors:  Christine Margaret Markham; Ross Shegog; Amy Dolph Leonard; Thanh C Bui; Mary E Paul
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2009-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.