Justin C Strickland1, B Levi Bolin2, Joshua A Lile3, Craig R Rush3, William W Stoops4. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky Arts and Sciences, 110 Kastle Hall, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, USA. 2. Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 1100 Veterans Drive, Medical Behavioral Science Building Room 140, Lexington, KY 40536-0086, USA. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky Arts and Sciences, 110 Kastle Hall, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, USA; Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 1100 Veterans Drive, Medical Behavioral Science Building Room 140, Lexington, KY 40536-0086, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 3470 Blazer Parkway, Lexington, KY 40509-1810, USA. 4. Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky Arts and Sciences, 110 Kastle Hall, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, USA; Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 1100 Veterans Drive, Medical Behavioral Science Building Room 140, Lexington, KY 40536-0086, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 3470 Blazer Parkway, Lexington, KY 40509-1810, USA. Electronic address: william.stoops@uky.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Altered sensitivity to positive and negative outcomes may be linked to the maladaptive choices characteristic of substance use disorders. Few studies have determined the distinct roles that positive and negative outcomes play in stimulus-response learning in cocaine users. The purpose of the present study was to investigate sensitivity to learning from positive and negative outcomes on a probabilistic learning task in cocaine users employing human laboratory and crowdsourcing techniques. METHODS: Individuals who reported cocaine use were recruited for a laboratory study (Experiment 1) or an online study on Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk (mTurk) (Experiment 2). All participants completed a feedback-based probabilistic learning task in which images were classified into categories (A versus B). Positive and negative outcomes were provided in a probabilistic manner on separate trials. Proportion of optimal responses and response times were recorded. RESULTS: Active cocaine users were less sensitive to learning from positive relative to negative outcomes. These effects were consistent across image type and session in the laboratory sample. Similarly, reduced sensitivity to learning from positive outcomes was observed in cocaine users on mTurk. Control participants did not show suboptimal performance following positive or negative outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study extends the limited research on feedback-based learning in drug users by demonstrating reduced sensitivity to positive outcomes in cocaine users recruited in the human laboratory and online. Future studies on the clinical significance and mechanisms underlying this bias are needed to understand its relevance as a target for intervention development.
BACKGROUND: Altered sensitivity to positive and negative outcomes may be linked to the maladaptive choices characteristic of substance use disorders. Few studies have determined the distinct roles that positive and negative outcomes play in stimulus-response learning in cocaine users. The purpose of the present study was to investigate sensitivity to learning from positive and negative outcomes on a probabilistic learning task in cocaine users employing human laboratory and crowdsourcing techniques. METHODS: Individuals who reported cocaine use were recruited for a laboratory study (Experiment 1) or an online study on Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk (mTurk) (Experiment 2). All participants completed a feedback-based probabilistic learning task in which images were classified into categories (A versus B). Positive and negative outcomes were provided in a probabilistic manner on separate trials. Proportion of optimal responses and response times were recorded. RESULTS: Active cocaine users were less sensitive to learning from positive relative to negative outcomes. These effects were consistent across image type and session in the laboratory sample. Similarly, reduced sensitivity to learning from positive outcomes was observed in cocaine users on mTurk. Control participants did not show suboptimal performance following positive or negative outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study extends the limited research on feedback-based learning in drug users by demonstrating reduced sensitivity to positive outcomes in cocaine users recruited in the human laboratory and online. Future studies on the clinical significance and mechanisms underlying this bias are needed to understand its relevance as a target for intervention development.
Authors: Rita Z Goldstein; Patricia A Woicik; Thomas Maloney; Dardo Tomasi; Nelly Alia-Klein; Juntian Shan; Jean Honorio; Dimitris Samaras; Ruiliang Wang; Frank Telang; Gene-Jack Wang; Nora D Volkow Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-09-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Zsuzsanna Somlai; Ahmed A Moustafa; Szabolcs Kéri; Catherine E Myers; Mark A Gluck Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2010-08-25 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Nehal P Vadhan; Catherine E Myers; Eric Rubin; Daphna Shohamy; Richard W Foltin; Mark A Gluck Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2007-10-31 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Scott D Lane; Charles E Green; Joy M Schmitz; Nuvan Rathnayaka; Wendy B Fang; Sergi Ferré; F Gerard Moeller Journal: J Addict Res Ther Date: 2014
Authors: Mohammad M Herzallah; Ahmed A Moustafa; Joman Y Natsheh; Salam M Abdellatif; Mohamad B Taha; Yasin I Tayem; Mahmud A Sehwail; Ivona Amleh; Georgios Petrides; Catherine E Myers; Mark A Gluck Journal: Front Integr Neurosci Date: 2013-09-23
Authors: Jin H Yoon; Robert Suchting; Sarah A McKay; Guadalupe G San Miguel; Anka A Vujanovic; Angela L Stotts; Scott D Lane; Jessica N Vincent; Michael F Weaver; Austin Lin; Joy M Schmitz Journal: Psychol Addict Behav Date: 2019-06-24
Authors: Nicole L Tosun; Sharon S Allen; Lynn E Eberly; Meng Yao; William W Stoops; Justin C Strickland; Katherine A Harrison; Mustafa al'Absi; Marilyn E Carroll Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: T V Lim; R N Cardinal; G Savulich; P S Jones; A A Moustafa; T W Robbins; K D Ersche Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Tsen Vei Lim; Rudolf N Cardinal; Edward T Bullmore; Trevor W Robbins; Karen D Ersche Journal: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2021-11-12 Impact factor: 5.176