OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine stimulus-response (S-R) learning in active cocaine users. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two cocaine-dependent participants (20 males and 2 females) and 21 non-drug using control participants (19 males and 2 females) who were similar in age and education were administered two computerized learning tasks. The Acquired Equivalence task initially requires learning of simple antecedent-consequent discriminations, but later requires generalization of this learning when the stimuli are presented in novel recombinations. The Weather Prediction task requires the prediction of a dichotomous outcome based on different stimuli combinations when the stimuli predict the outcome only probabilistically. RESULTS: On the Acquired Equivalence task, cocaine users made significantly more errors than control participants when required to learn new discriminations while maintaining previously learned discriminations, but performed similarly to controls when required to generalize this learning. No group differences were seen on the Weather Prediction task. CONCLUSIONS: Cocaine users' learning of stimulus discriminations under conflicting response demands was impaired, but their ability to generalize this learning once they achieved criterion was intact. This performance pattern is consistent with other laboratory studies of long-term cocaine users that demonstrated that established learning interfered with new learning on incremental learning tasks, relative to healthy controls, and may reflect altered dopamine transmission in the basal ganglia of long-term cocaine users.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine stimulus-response (S-R) learning in active cocaine users. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two cocaine-dependent participants (20 males and 2 females) and 21 non-drug using control participants (19 males and 2 females) who were similar in age and education were administered two computerized learning tasks. The Acquired Equivalence task initially requires learning of simple antecedent-consequent discriminations, but later requires generalization of this learning when the stimuli are presented in novel recombinations. The Weather Prediction task requires the prediction of a dichotomous outcome based on different stimuli combinations when the stimuli predict the outcome only probabilistically. RESULTS: On the Acquired Equivalence task, cocaine users made significantly more errors than control participants when required to learn new discriminations while maintaining previously learned discriminations, but performed similarly to controls when required to generalize this learning. No group differences were seen on the Weather Prediction task. CONCLUSIONS:Cocaine users' learning of stimulus discriminations under conflicting response demands was impaired, but their ability to generalize this learning once they achieved criterion was intact. This performance pattern is consistent with other laboratory studies of long-term cocaine users that demonstrated that established learning interfered with new learning on incremental learning tasks, relative to healthy controls, and may reflect altered dopamine transmission in the basal ganglia of long-term cocaine users.
Authors: G Bartzokis; P H Lu; M Beckson; R Rapoport; S Grant; E J Wiseman; E D London Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Catherine E Myers; Daphna Shohamy; Mark A Gluck; Steven Grossman; Alan Kluger; Steven Ferris; James Golomb; Geoffrey Schnirman; Ronald Schwartz Journal: J Cogn Neurosci Date: 2003-02-15 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Ahmed A Moustafa; Szabolcs Keri; Mohammad M Herzallah; Catherine E Myers; Mark A Gluck Journal: Brain Cogn Date: 2010-08-21 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Kenneth M Carpenter; Paul C Amrhein; Krysten W Bold; Kaitlyn Mishlen; Frances R Levin; Wilfrid N Raby; Suzette M Evans; Richard W Foltin; Edward V Nunes Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2016-02-25 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Xi Luo; Sheng Zhang; Sien Hu; Sarah R Bednarski; Emily Erdman; Olivia M Farr; Kwang-Ik Hong; Rajita Sinha; Carolyn M Mazure; Chiang-Shan R Li Journal: Brain Date: 2013-03-12 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Catherine E Myers; Janice Rego; Paul Haber; Kirsten Morley; Kevin D Beck; Lee Hogarth; Ahmed A Moustafa Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Justin C Strickland; B Levi Bolin; Joshua A Lile; Craig R Rush; William W Stoops Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2016-06-27 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Sheng Zhang; Sien Hu; Rajita Sinha; Marc N Potenza; Robert T Malison; Chiang-Shan R Li Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2016-08-04 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: András Puszta; Xénia Katona; Balázs Bodosi; Ákos Pertich; Diána Nyujtó; Gábor Braunitzer; Attila Nagy Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 3.169