Literature DB >> 27372556

A prospective randomized trial evaluating two different tensioning techniques for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

Huijun Kang1, Fei Wang2, Jianhui Cao1, Xiaohui Liu1, Gang Ji3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the literature, graft tension was mostly assessed under direct arthroscopy vision for a MPFL reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess the outcomes of MPFL reconstruction with graft tension of self-balance technique in comparison with arthroscopy-view technique.
METHODS: Sixty patients with recurrent patellar dislocation were randomly divided into two groups to undergo MPFL reconstruction with graft tension either by the self-balance technique (SB group) or the arthroscopy-view technique (AV group). At a minimum of 24months of follow up, patellar stability was evaluated with the apprehension test. Patellofemoral morphology was measured on an axial CT scan and knee function was evaluated using the Kujala and Lysholm scores.
RESULTS: Twenty-three patients in the SB group and 25 patients in the AV group were followed for a minimum of 24months. No recurrent dislocation or subluxation was reported. Apprehension signs remained in two patients in the SB group and in one patient in the AV group. The postoperative Kujala score for the SB group and AV group were 91.4±5.1 and 90.3±5.5, respectively, and the Lysholm score was 90.1±6.4 and 88.4±6.3, respectively, with no significant differences. On CT images, congruence angle, patellar tilt angle and lateral patellar angle were restored to the normal range.
CONCLUSIONS: At a minimum of 24months of follow-up, graft tensioning using the self-balance technique yielded similar patellar stability and knee function compared with the arthroscopy-view procedure in the MPFL reconstruction. The self-balance technique as a simple procedure is recommended as a good alternative method for graft tensioning in the MPFL reconstruction.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomical reconstruction; Arthroscopy; Graft tension; Medial patellofemoral ligament; Patellar dislocation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27372556     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  6 in total

1.  Double-bundle anatomical medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with lateral retinaculum plasty can lead to good outcomes in patients with patellar dislocation.

Authors:  Yingzhen Niu; Xinmin Wang; Chang Liu; Xiaomeng Wang; Zhenyue Dong; Jinghui Niu; Fei Wang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  The medial patellofemoral complex.

Authors:  Alexander E Loeb; Miho J Tanaka
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-06

3.  Dynamic versus static medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction technique in the treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation: a randomized clinical trial protocol.

Authors:  Anna Bartsch; Corina Nüesch; Bertram Rieger; Annegret Mündermann; Christian Egloff
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-07-10       Impact factor: 2.677

4.  A new minimally invasive surgical technique for medial retinaculum repair following traumatic patellar dislocation.

Authors:  Haim Shtarker; Michael Assaf; Marshall N Deltoff
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-01-04

Review 5.  Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with and without trochleoplasty for patients with patella instability-correlation of trochlear dysplasia and patient outcome, classification and outcome measure in the past decade-a systematic review.

Authors:  Cheryl Marise Peilin Tan; Yanan Zhu; Liang Guo; Sir Young James Loh
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-06-12

6.  Treatment of patellar dislocation with arthroscopic medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using gracilis tendon autograft and modified double-patellar tunnel technique: minimum 5-year patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Guanying Gao; Ping Liu; Yan Xu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.359

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.