Literature DB >> 34120236

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with and without trochleoplasty for patients with patella instability-correlation of trochlear dysplasia and patient outcome, classification and outcome measure in the past decade-a systematic review.

Cheryl Marise Peilin Tan1, Yanan Zhu2,3, Liang Guo2,3, Sir Young James Loh4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The primary aim of the study is to compare the patient outcome in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) or MPFLR concurrent with trochleoplasty (MPFLR + TP) and correlate it with the degree of trochlear dysplasia (TD). The secondary aim is to review TD classification, outcome measure, chronological and geographical trend of such studies in the past decade.
METHODS: A systemic review of the literature in the past decade on studies of patients with patella instability and underwent either a MPFLR or MPFLR + TP. The degree of TD with the patient outcome was correlated and compared between the 2 groups. The TD classification, outcome measures, chronological and geographical trends of these studies were documented.
RESULTS: There is no statistical difference in the overall improvement in the compared outcome scores between the 2 groups. However, the MPFLR studies reported a total of 16 re-dislocation in contrast to none in the MPFLR + TP studies. The 24 selected studies in the current review utilized different TD classification as well as outcome measures. A more homogeneous subgroup of 12 studies utilized Dejour classification as well as Kujala score that enabled comparison and showed no significant difference in outcome. The highest number of MPFLR publications was in 2019 and was from North and South Americas, Asia and Europe. The MPFLR + TP studies were from Europe during 2013 to 2017.
CONCLUSION: Though there is an overall improvement in post-operative outcomes scores with no statistical significance between MPFLR and MPFLR + TP, the documented re-dislocations in the MPFLR studies suggested an undetermined zone where the choice of procedure could result in a different outcome. The current review did not show correlation between the degree of TD with the patient outcome to provide a clear indication for either procedure according to the degree of TD. The diverse TD classifications and varied outcome measures indicated the need for standardization and consistency in documentation to guide the treating clinician in the choice of procedure. MPFLR was more commonly performed and studied than MPFLR + TP in the past decade.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MPFL; Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction; Recurrent lateral patellar dislocation; Trochlear dysplasia; Trochleoplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34120236     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-021-03030-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  44 in total

Review 1.  Current concepts on anatomy and biomechanics of patellar stability.

Authors:  Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rev       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Anatomical double-bundle MPFL reconstruction with an aperture fixation.

Authors:  Philip B Schöttle; Daniel Hensler; Andreas B Imhoff
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: the superficial quad technique.

Authors:  Deepak Goyal
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  The prevalence and combined prevalences of anatomic factors associated with recurrent patellar dislocation: a magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Robert N Steensen; Jared C Bentley; Thai Q Trinh; Jeffrey R Backes; Roger E Wiltfong
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Clinical and radiological outcome of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with a semitendinosus autograft for patella instability.

Authors:  P B Schöttle; S F Fucentese; J Romero
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Factors of patellar instability: an anatomic radiographic study.

Authors:  H Dejour; G Walch; L Nove-Josserand; C Guier
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  What activities do patients with patellar instability perceive makes their patella unstable?

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Simon T Donell; Rachel Chester; Allan Clark; Richard Stephenson
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  MR imaging of patellar instability: injury patterns and assessment of risk factors.

Authors:  Gerd Diederichs; Ahi S Issever; Sven Scheffler
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  Epidemiology and natural history of acute patellar dislocation.

Authors:  Donald C Fithian; Elizabeth W Paxton; Mary Lou Stone; Patricia Silva; Daniel K Davis; David A Elias; Lawrence M White
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-05-18       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Comparison between a static and a dynamic technique for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  João Ellera Gomes
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.772

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.