Literature DB >> 2736929

Additional work of breathing imposed by endotracheal tubes, breathing circuits, and intensive care ventilators.

A D Bersten1, A J Rutten, A E Vedig, G A Skowronski.   

Abstract

A disadvantage of spontaneous breathing through an endotracheal tube (ETT) and connector attached to a breathing circuit and/or ventilator (breathing device) is an increase in the work of breathing. The work of breathing associated with ETT of 6 to 9-mm diameter and eight breathing devices was determined, using a lung simulator to mimic spontaneous inspiration at flow rates of 20 to 100 L/min and a tidal volume of 500 ml, at both zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) and 10 cm H2O continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Work associated with the breathing devices alone (WCIR) ranged from -0.002 kg.m/L (Servo 900-C ventilator, 7-mm ETT, 20 L/min, ZEEP) to 0.1 kg.m/L (continuous flow circuit, 7-mm ETT, 100 L/min, CPAP), the latter representing 196% of the work of normal breathing. When the devices were attached to ETT, total apparatus work (WAPP) ranged from 0.009 kg.m/L (Mapleson-D circuit, 9-mm ETT, 20 L/min, ZEEP) to 0.25 kg.m/L (Drager EV-A, 6-mm ETT, 100 L/min, ZEEP), the latter representing 490% of the work of normal breathing. This additional work imposed by the ETT varied considerably among devices. Spontaneous breathing through modern ventilators, circuits and ETT imposes a burden of increased work, most of which is associated with the presence of the ETT and connector. Whether this burden represents an impediment to the weaning patient, or has training value for the ultimate resumption of unassisted spontaneous ventilation, remains to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2736929     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-198907000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  19 in total

Review 1.  Difficult weaning from mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  J C Chevrolet
Journal:  Lung       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.584

2.  Ventilator Y-piece pressure compared with intratracheal airway pressure in healthy intubated children.

Authors:  Omer Nasiroglu; Bruce Craig Weldon; Lawrence S Berman; Ikram Ul Haque
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Inspiratory work imposed by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machines: the effect of CPAP level and endotracheal tube size.

Authors:  J L Moran; S Homan; M O'Fathartaigh; M Jackson; P Leppard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Respiratory comfort of automatic tube compensation and inspiratory pressure support in conscious humans.

Authors:  J Guttmann; H Bernhard; G Mols; A Benzing; P Hofmann; C Haberthür; D Zappe; B Fabry; K Geiger
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Roles of endotracheal tubes and slip joints in respiratory pressure loss: a laboratory study.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Takasugi; Koichi Futagawa; Kouhei Kazuhara; Satoshi Morishita; Takahiko Okuda
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Evaluation of a fiberoptic system for airway pressure monitoring.

Authors:  J Koska; E Kelley; M J Banner; P Blanch
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1994-07

7.  Aerosol kinetics and bronchodilator efficacy during continuous positive airway pressure delivered by face mask.

Authors:  S N Parkes; A D Bersten
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 9.139

8.  Post-intubation laryngeal injuries and extubation failure: a fiberoptic endoscopic study.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Tadié; Eva Behm; Lucien Lecuyer; Rania Benhmamed; Stéphane Hans; Daniel Brasnu; Jean-Luc Diehl; Jean-Yves Fagon; Emmanuel Guérot
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  P0.1 is a useful parameter in setting the level of pressure support ventilation.

Authors:  A Alberti; F Gallo; A Fongaro; S Valenti; A Rossi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Re-engineering ventilatory support to decrease days and improve resource utilization.

Authors:  O C Kirton; C B DeHaven; J Hudson-Civetta; J P Morgan; J Windsor; J M Civetta
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.