Literature DB >> 27366576

Evaluation of the Approaches of the Anaesthesiologists on Maintenance of Anaesthesia Machines.

Uğur Altınışık1, Hatice Betül Altınışık1, Tuncer Şimşek1, Hasan Ali Kiraz1, Tuğba Doğu1, Hüseyin Toman1, Hasan Şahin1, Mesut Erbaş1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to discuss the level of knowledge and approach on 'maintenance, calibration and cleaning of anaesthesia devices' among anaesthesiologists in Turkey.
METHODS: A questionnaire was prepared with 21 questions based on the Google document system, and these questionnaires were sent to the anaesthesiologists via e-mail.
RESULTS: Overall, 226 anaesthesiologists answered our survey. With respect to the maintenance and calibration, anaesthesiologists had sufficient information about the vaporizer and the carbon dioxide canister devices; however, information about the vital components, such as disassembly of the anaesthesia machine, flow sensor, oxygen sensor, battery and exhaust system, was insufficient. The cleaning and sterilization procedures were performed when the devices became dirty, and the bacteria filter was used only for the protection of the anaesthesia system. There was a lack of knowledge about how and which part of the anaesthesia device should be disinfected. In total, 85% of the survey participants were thinking of the need of additional education on anaesthesia machine maintenance.
CONCLUSION: It is observed that education about anaesthesia device maintenance, calibration and cleaning issues is obviously necessary for the anaesthesiology specialists in our country. We believe that it would be useful to highlight this issue to anaesthesia educational institutions and anaesthesia associations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anaesthesia device; calibration; hygiene; maintenance

Year:  2016        PMID: 27366576      PMCID: PMC4925003          DOI: 10.5152/TJAR.2016.80008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim        ISSN: 2149-276X


  19 in total

1.  Building a large-scale perioperative anaesthesia outcome-tracking database: methodology, implementation, and experiences from one provider within the German quality project.

Authors:  U Bothner; M Georgieff; B Schwilk
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 2.  Evidence on measures for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Authors:  L Lorente; S Blot; J Rello
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 16.671

3.  Exposure of postoperative nurses to exhaled anesthetic gases.

Authors:  D I Sessler; J M Badgwell
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Technical communication: An initial evaluation of a novel anesthetic scavenging interface.

Authors:  John A Barwise; Leland J Lancaster; Damon Michaels; Jason E Pope; James M Berry
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Air compressor battery duration with mechanical ventilation in a field anesthesia machine.

Authors:  Dale F Szpisjak; Anthony A Giberman
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.437

6.  Failed calibration of anesthesia machine due to look-alike oxygen sensors.

Authors:  Andrea P Dutoit; Susanna R Berger; Mohanad Shukry; Amir L Butt; Alberto J de Armendi
Journal:  A A Case Rep       Date:  2014-01-01

7.  Mask induction despite circuit obstruction: an unrecognized hazard of relying on automated machine check technology.

Authors:  Kamie K Yang; Ian H Lewis
Journal:  A A Case Rep       Date:  2014-06-15

8.  Automated checkout routines in anesthesia workstations vary in detection and management of breathing circuit obstruction.

Authors:  Michael P Dosch
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Standard gases used to calibrate anesthetic vapor analyzers: are they stable?

Authors:  D R Westenskow; C F Wallroth; H D Hattendorff; R Best-Timmann; K L Gippert
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1994-01

10.  An audit of level two and level three checks of anaesthesia delivery systems performed at three hospitals in South Australia.

Authors:  N Sweeney; H Owen; R Fronsko; E Hurlow
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.669

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.