Literature DB >> 27365391

A Conserved Ectodomain-Transmembrane Domain Linker Motif Tunes the Allosteric Regulation of Cell Surface Receptors.

Thomas Schmidt1, Feng Ye2, Alan J Situ1, Woojin An3, Mark H Ginsberg2, Tobias S Ulmer4.   

Abstract

In many families of cell surface receptors, a single transmembrane (TM) α-helix separates ecto- and cytosolic domains. A defined coupling of ecto- and TM domains must be essential to allosteric receptor regulation but remains little understood. Here, we characterize the linker structure, dynamics, and resulting ecto-TM domain coupling of integrin αIIb in model constructs and relate it to other integrin α subunits by mutagenesis. Cellular integrin activation assays subsequently validate the findings in intact receptors. Our results indicate a flexible yet carefully tuned ecto-TM coupling that modulates the signaling threshold of integrin receptors. Interestingly, a proline at the N-terminal TM helix border, termed NBP, is critical to linker flexibility in integrins. NBP is further predicted in 21% of human single-pass TM proteins and validated in cytokine receptors by the TM domain structure of the cytokine receptor common subunit β and its P441A-substituted variant. Thus, NBP is a conserved uncoupling motif of the ecto-TM domain transition and the degree of ecto-TM domain coupling represents an important parameter in the allosteric regulation of diverse cell surface receptors.
© 2016 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  allosteric regulation; cytokine; integrin; isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC); nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR); protein dynamics; receptor signaling; transmembrane cell surface receptors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27365391      PMCID: PMC5016151          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M116.733683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  57 in total

1.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

Authors:  A Krogh; B Larsson; G von Heijne; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  The Xplor-NIH NMR molecular structure determination package.

Authors:  Charles D Schwieters; John J Kuszewski; Nico Tjandra; G Marius Clore
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Modulation of CD11b/CD18 adhesive activity by its extracellular, membrane-proximal regions.

Authors:  Yu-Mei Xiong; Jian Chen; Li Zhang
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes.

Authors:  F Delaglio; S Grzesiek; G W Vuister; G Zhu; J Pfeifer; A Bax
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  Structural evidence for loose linkage between ligand binding and kinase activation in the epidermal growth factor receptor.

Authors:  Chafen Lu; Li-Zhi Mi; Michael J Grey; Jieqing Zhu; Elizabeth Graef; Shigeyuki Yokoyama; Timothy A Springer
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 6.  Transmembrane communication: general principles and lessons from the structure and function of the M2 proton channel, K⁺ channels, and integrin receptors.

Authors:  Gevorg Grigoryan; David T Moore; William F DeGrado
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 7.  Putting together structures of epidermal growth factor receptors.

Authors:  Nicholas J Bessman; Daniel M Freed; Mark A Lemmon
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 6.809

8.  Facile measurement of ¹H-¹5N residual dipolar couplings in larger perdeuterated proteins.

Authors:  Nicholas C Fitzkee; Ad Bax
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  Interactions of platelet integrin alphaIIb and beta3 transmembrane domains in mammalian cell membranes and their role in integrin activation.

Authors:  Chungho Kim; Tong-Lay Lau; Tobias S Ulmer; Mark H Ginsberg
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Characterization of thermotropic state changes in myosin subfragment-1 and heavy meromyosin by UV difference spectroscopy.

Authors:  U Kamath; J W Shriver
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1989-04-05       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  6 in total

1.  Energy landscape differences among integrins establish the framework for understanding activation.

Authors:  Jing Li; Timothy A Springer
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 2.  Application of Solution NMR to Structural Studies on α-Helical Integral Membrane Proteins.

Authors:  Dae-Won Sim; Zhenwei Lu; Hyung-Sik Won; Seu-Na Lee; Min-Duk Seo; Bong-Jin Lee; Ji-Hun Kim
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Universal principles of membrane protein assembly, composition and evolution.

Authors:  Alan J Situ; Tobias S Ulmer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  On the contributing role of the transmembrane domain for subunit-specific sensitivity of integrin activation.

Authors:  Giulia Pagani; Holger Gohlke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Structural Understanding of Interleukin 6 Family Cytokine Signaling and Targeted Therapies: Focus on Interleukin 11.

Authors:  Riley D Metcalfe; Tracy L Putoczki; Michael D W Griffin
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  Orchestration of signaling by structural disorder in class 1 cytokine receptors.

Authors:  Pernille Seiffert; Katrine Bugge; Mads Nygaard; Gitte W Haxholm; Jacob H Martinsen; Martin N Pedersen; Lise Arleth; Wouter Boomsma; Birthe B Kragelund
Journal:  Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 5.712

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.