Literature DB >> 27363385

Prenatal Testing for Adult-Onset Conditions: the Position of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Laura Hercher1, Wendy R Uhlmann2, Erin P Hoffman3, Shanna Gustafson4, Kelly M Chen5.   

Abstract

Advances in genetic testing and the availability of such testing in pregnancy allows prospective parents to test their future child for adult-onset conditions. This ability raises several complex ethical issues. Prospective parents have reproductive rights to obtain information about their fetus. This information may or may not alter pregnancy management. These rights can be in conflict with the rights of the future individual, who will be denied the right to elect or decline testing. This paper highlights the complexity of these issues, details discussions that went into the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) Public Policy Task Force's development of the Prenatal testing for Adult-Onset Conditions position statement adopted in November 2014, and cites relevant literature on this topic through December 2015. Issues addressed include parental rights and autonomy, rights of the future child, the right not to know, possible adverse effects on childhood and the need for genetic counseling. This paper will serve as a reference to genetic counselors and healthcare professionals when faced with this situation in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult-onset conditions; Ethical issues; Genetic counseling; Position statement; Prenatal testing; Reproductive rights; The National Society of genetic counselors

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27363385     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-9992-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  23 in total

1.  REACTIONS TO THE THREATENED LOSS OF A CHILD: A VULNERABLE CHILD SYNDROME. PEDIATRIC MANAGEMENT OF THE DYING CHILD, PART III.

Authors:  M GREEN; A J SOLNIT
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Is There a Right Time to Know? The Right Not to Know and Genetic Testing in Children.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Mahsa Shabani; Heidi Carmen Howard
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.718

3.  Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 3: the ethical and counseling implications of new genomic technologies: all pregnant women should be offered prenatal diagnostic genome-wide testing for prenatally identified fetal congenital anomalies.

Authors:  R Douglas Wilson; David H Ledbetter; Eugene Pergament
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Prenatal exome sequencing for fetuses with structural abnormalities: the next step.

Authors:  S C Hillman; D Willams; K J Carss; D J McMullan; M E Hurles; M D Kilby
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 7.299

5.  The right to genetic ignorance confirmed.

Authors:  Tuija Takala
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.898

6.  Problems assessing uptake of Huntington disease predictive testing and a proposed solution.

Authors:  Roslyn J Tassicker; Betty Teltscher; M Kaye Trembath; Veronica Collins; Leslie J Sheffield; Edmond Chiu; Lyle Gurrin; Martin B Delatycki
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 7.  Committee Opinion No. 640: Cell-Free DNA Screening For Fetal Aneuploidy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Decreasing uptake of predictive testing for Huntington's disease in a German centre: 12 years' experience (1993-2004).

Authors:  Christiane Bernhardt; Anne-Marie Schwan; Peter Kraus; Joerg Thomas Epplen; Erdmute Kunstmann
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Technical report: Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children.

Authors:  Lainie Friedman Ross; Laine Friedman Ross; Howard M Saal; Karen L David; Rebecca R Anderson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Exome sequencing improves genetic diagnosis of structural fetal abnormalities revealed by ultrasound.

Authors:  Keren J Carss; Sarah C Hillman; Vijaya Parthiban; Dominic J McMullan; Eamonn R Maher; Mark D Kilby; Matthew E Hurles
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 6.150

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  A case-note review of continued pregnancies found to be at a high risk of Huntington's disease: considerations for clinical practice.

Authors:  Felicity Wadrup; Simon Holden; Rhona MacLeod; Zosia Miedzybrodzka; Andrea H Németh; Shan Owens; Sara Pasalodos; Oliver Quarrell; Angus J Clarke
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 2.  Ethical issues in neurogenetics.

Authors:  Wendy R Uhlmann; J Scott Roberts
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2018

Review 3.  Genetic testing for neurodegenerative diseases: Ethical and health communication challenges.

Authors:  J Scott Roberts; Anne K Patterson; Wendy R Uhlmann
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.996

4.  The fetus in the age of the genome.

Authors:  Dagmar Schmitz; Wolfram Henn
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 5.881

5.  Rethinking the "open future" argument against predictive genetic testing of children.

Authors:  Jeremy R Garrett; John D Lantos; Leslie G Biesecker; Janet E Childerhose; Wendy K Chung; Ingrid A Holm; Barbara A Koenig; Jean E McEwen; Benjamin S Wilfond; Kyle Brothers
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 8.822

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.