Literature DB >> 19904661

Diminished speech intelligibility associated with certain types of respirators worn by healthcare workers.

Lewis J Radonovich1, Robert Yanke, Jing Cheng, Bradley Bender.   

Abstract

This study sought to determine the level of communication interference associated with commonly used disposable and reusable respirators and surgical masks worn by healthcare workers. Speech intelligibility was assessed using the modified rhyme test in an intensive care unit environment. Respirators decreased speech intelligibility by a range of 1% to 17%, although not all were statistically significant. Differences in speech intelligibility associated with surgical masks and disposable filtering facepiece respirators (without exhalation valves) were not statistically significant compared with controls. Wearing half-face elastomeric respirators with voice augmentation equipment was associated with higher speech intelligibility than models without this equipment (OR = 2.81). Hearing clarity while wearing a powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) was 79% compared with 90% with no PAPR (OR = 0.40). While some respirators appear to have little or no effect on speech intelligibility, interference with speech intelligibility associated with certain types of respirators commonly worn by U.S. healthcare workers may be substantial.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19904661     DOI: 10.1080/15459620903404803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  22 in total

1.  Speech intelligibility test methodology applied to powered air-purifying respirators used in healthcare.

Authors:  Susan Xu; Jeremy Simons; Patrick Yorio; Dana Rottach; Ziqing Zhuang; Lewis Radonovich
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 2.  The contribution of respiratory and hearing protection use to psychological distress in the workplace: a scoping review.

Authors:  Richard Leung; Margaret M Cook; Mike F Capra; Kelly R Johnstone
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.851

3.  Developing Educational Health Modules to Improve Vocal Wellness in Mask-Wearing Occupational Voice Users.

Authors:  Victoria S McKenna; Renee L Gustin; Rebecca J Howell; Tulsi H Patel; Mariah B Emery; Courtney L Kendall; Nicholas J Kelliher
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Dispersion and exposure to a cough-generated aerosol in a simulated medical examination room.

Authors:  William G Lindsley; William P King; Robert E Thewlis; Jeffrey S Reynolds; Kedar Panday; Gang Cao; Jonathan V Szalajda
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Qualitative Analysis of Origins and Evolution of an Elastomeric Respirator-based Hospital Respiratory Protection Program.

Authors:  Stella E Hines; Nora Mueller; Marc Oliver; Patricia Gucer; Melissa McDiarmid
Journal:  J Int Soc Respir Prot       Date:  2017

6.  Prevalence of Respiratory Protective Devices in U.S. Health Care Facilities: Implications for Emergency Preparedness.

Authors:  Kerri Wizner; Lindsay Stradtman; Debra Novak; Ronald Shaffer
Journal:  Workplace Health Saf       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.413

7.  Speech intelligibility assessment of protective facemasks and air-purifying respirators.

Authors:  Andrew J Palmiero; Daniel Symons; Judge W Morgan; Ronald E Shaffer
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Impact of Face Masks on Speech Acoustics and Vocal Effort in Healthcare Professionals.

Authors:  Victoria S McKenna; Courtney L Kendall; Tulsi H Patel; Rebecca J Howell; Renee L Gustin
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Acoustic voice characteristics with and without wearing a facemask.

Authors:  Duy Duong Nguyen; Patricia McCabe; Donna Thomas; Alison Purcell; Maree Doble; Daniel Novakovic; Antonia Chacon; Catherine Madill
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A tolerability assessment of new respiratory protective devices developed for health care personnel: A randomized simulated clinical study.

Authors:  Lewis J Radonovich; Kerri Wizner; Sherri L LaVela; Martin L Lee; Kimberly Findley; Patrick Yorio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.