Literature DB >> 34491799

Listening in 2020: A Survey of Adults' Experiences With Pandemic-Related Disruptions.

Karen S Helfer1, Sara K Mamo1, Michael Clauss1, Silvana Tellerico1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced lifestyle changes that may negatively impact communication, including the pervasive use of face masks and videoconferencing technology. Here, we examine the effects of age and self-rated hearing on subjective measures of speech understanding via a survey accessed by adults residing in the United States.
METHOD: Responses to an online survey were obtained from adults (21 years of age and older) during the summer and fall of 2020. The survey included questions about hearing and speech understanding in a variety of scenarios and different listening conditions, including when communicating with people using face masks in quiet and noisy environments and when using videoconferencing.
RESULTS: Data from 1,703 surveys were analyzed. In general, the use of face masks led to the perception of poorer speech understanding and greater need for concentration, especially in noisy environments. When responses from all participants were considered, poorer self-rated communication ability was noted as age increased. However, among people who categorized their overall hearing as "Excellent" or "Good," younger adults rated their speech understanding ability in noisy situations as poorer than middle-age or older adults. Among people who rated their overall hearing as "Fair" or "Poor," middle-age adults indicated having more difficulty communicating with people using face masks, as compared with older adults. Examination of open-ended responses suggested that the strategies individuals use when communicating with people wearing face masks vary by age and self-rated hearing. Notably, middle-age and older adults were more likely to report using strategies that could put them at risk (e.g., asking others to remove their face masks).
CONCLUSIONS: Even younger adults with self-perceived good hearing are not immune to communication challenges brought about by face masks. Among individuals with similar degrees of self-rated hearing, the expected increase in communication difficulty with age was not noted among our respondents. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.16528431.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34491799      PMCID: PMC9126114          DOI: 10.1044/2021_AJA-21-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Audiol        ISSN: 1059-0889            Impact factor:   1.636


  33 in total

1.  Audiovisual speech in older and younger adults: integrating a distorted visual signal with speech in noise.

Authors:  Michael S Gordon; Suzanne Allen
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.645

2.  Likert scales, levels of measurement and the "laws" of statistics.

Authors:  Geoff Norman
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.853

3.  Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise.

Authors:  Penny Anderson Gosselin; Jean-Pierre Gagné
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL).

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Sophia E Kramer; Mark A Eckert; Brent Edwards; Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Larry E Humes; Ulrike Lemke; Thomas Lunner; Mohan Matthen; Carol L Mackersie; Graham Naylor; Natalie A Phillips; Michael Richter; Mary Rudner; Mitchell S Sommers; Kelly L Tremblay; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  The effect of hearing loss on source-distance dependent speech intelligibility in rooms.

Authors:  A Westermann; J M Buchholz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The Effect of Conventional and Transparent Surgical Masks on Speech Understanding in Individuals with and without Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Samuel R Atcherson; Lisa Lucks Mendel; Wesley J Baltimore; Chhayakanta Patro; Sungmin Lee; Monique Pousson; M Joshua Spann
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Contributions of oral and extraoral facial movement to visual and audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Sharon M Thomas; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Impacts of face coverings on communication: an indirect impact of COVID-19.

Authors:  Gabrielle H Saunders; Iain R Jackson; Anisa S Visram
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  A Comparison of Parametric and Non-Parametric Methods Applied to a Likert Scale.

Authors:  Constantin Mircioiu; Jeffrey Atkinson
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-10

10.  The impact of face masks on the recall of spoken sentences.

Authors:  Thanh Lan Truong; Sara D Beck; Andrea Weber
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.