Literature DB >> 2735963

A reexamination of the effectiveness of self-care education for persons with arthritis.

J Goeppinger1, M W Arthur, A J Baglioni, S E Brunk, C M Brunner.   

Abstract

We examined the effectiveness of 2 models of arthritis self-care intervention, the home study model and the small group model. The effects of disease diagnosis and duration, self-care behavior, perceived helplessness, social support, treatment choice, and formal education level on outcomes among persons with arthritis who participated in these programs were evaluated. A pretest-posttest control group design was utilized in the initial experimental study; comparison group designs were used in the longitudinal studies. Three hundred seventy-four subjects completed the interventions and 12 months of research followup. We found that the intervention models had a statistically significant positive impact on arthritis knowledge, self-care behavior, perceived helplessness, and pain. These findings did not vary when the effects of education level, disease diagnosis and duration, informal social support, and treatment choice were controlled. The small group intervention was more effective in bringing about initial improvements in pain and depression, whereas the home study intervention was more effective in maintaining improvements in perceived helplessness. Changes in perceived helplessness and self-care behavior appear to explain in part the observed improvement in pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2735963     DOI: 10.1002/anr.1780320608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  17 in total

1.  Health education in rheumatology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Education: the need for a rethink.

Authors:  A K Thould
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Predictors of non-response and non-compliance in African American lupus patients: Findings from the Balancing Lupus Experiences with Stress Strategies (BLESS) Study.

Authors:  Edith M Williams; Jiajia Zhang; Jie Zhou; Diane Kamen; James C Oates
Journal:  Int J Med Biomed Sci       Date:  2014-02

Review 4.  Does patient education in rheumatoid arthritis have therapeutic potential?

Authors:  M Tucker; J R Kirwan
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Five factor model personality factors moderated the effects of an intervention to enhance chronic disease management self-efficacy.

Authors:  Peter Franks; Benjamin Chapman; Paul Duberstein; Anthony Jerant
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2008-09-20

6.  A randomized trial of three psychosocial treatments for the symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Arthur J Barsky; David K Ahern; E John Orav; Yvonne Nestoriuc; Matthew H Liang; Ilana T Berman; Joshua R Kingsbury; Jennifer T Sy; Kathryn G Wilk
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Measurement issues in the evaluation of chronic disease self-management programs.

Authors:  Sandra Nolte; Gerald R Elsworth; Stanton Newman; Richard H Osborne
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Project MATCH: training for a promotora intervention.

Authors:  Susan M Swider; Molly Martin; Carmen Lynas; Steven Rothschild
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 2.140

Review 9.  A realistic approach to managing patients with fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Geoffrey O Littlejohn; Janine Walker
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.592

10.  Using intervention mapping (IM) to develop a self-management programme for employees with a chronic disease in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Sarah I Detaille; Joost W J van der Gulden; Josephine A Engels; Yvonne F Heerkens; Frank J H van Dijk
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.