OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare the benefits of 3 psychosocial treatments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS:RA patients were randomized to cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT), relaxation response training (RR), or arthritis education (AE). All treatment was conducted in groups. Follow-up occurred immediately after treatment and 6 and 12 months later. Pain, other RA symptoms, role impairment, and psychological distress were assessed with standardized self-report questionnaires. Arthritis severity and activity were assessed with a joint examination, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, grip strength, and walking time. An intent-to-treat analytic strategy was employed. Linear regression was used to establish treatment effect on pain and other RA symptoms, while adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical variables. RESULTS:One hundred sixty-eight patients were randomized. Pain improved significantly at 12 months in the RR and AE groups and showed a nonsignificant positive trend with CBT. Other RA symptoms improved significantly with CBT and AE and showed a nonsignificant trend with RR. There were no significant differences in the outcomes across the 3 treatment groups. When the results for all 3 groups were aggregated, significant benefits were found for pain, other RA symptoms, self-care activities, and social activities. Effect sizes ranged between 0.26 and 0.35. CONCLUSIONS: These 3 psychosocial treatments were beneficial, with treatment effect sizes in the small to moderate range. The effects appeared immediately after treatment and were generally sustained at long-term follow-up. These benefits were achieved over and above those resulting from medical management. These treatments constitute an effective augmentation to standard medical therapy for RA patients.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare the benefits of 3 psychosocial treatments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: RA patients were randomized to cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT), relaxation response training (RR), or arthritis education (AE). All treatment was conducted in groups. Follow-up occurred immediately after treatment and 6 and 12 months later. Pain, other RA symptoms, role impairment, and psychological distress were assessed with standardized self-report questionnaires. Arthritis severity and activity were assessed with a joint examination, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, grip strength, and walking time. An intent-to-treat analytic strategy was employed. Linear regression was used to establish treatment effect on pain and other RA symptoms, while adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical variables. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-eight patients were randomized. Pain improved significantly at 12 months in the RR and AE groups and showed a nonsignificant positive trend with CBT. Other RA symptoms improved significantly with CBT and AE and showed a nonsignificant trend with RR. There were no significant differences in the outcomes across the 3 treatment groups. When the results for all 3 groups were aggregated, significant benefits were found for pain, other RA symptoms, self-care activities, and social activities. Effect sizes ranged between 0.26 and 0.35. CONCLUSIONS: These 3 psychosocial treatments were beneficial, with treatment effect sizes in the small to moderate range. The effects appeared immediately after treatment and were generally sustained at long-term follow-up. These benefits were achieved over and above those resulting from medical management. These treatments constitute an effective augmentation to standard medical therapy for RA patients.
Authors: D M van der Heijde; M A van't Hof; P L van Riel; M A van Leeuwen; M H van Rijswijk; L B van de Putte Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 1992-02 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Y Lindroth; M Brattström; I Bellman; G Ekestaf; Y Olofsson; B Strömbeck; B Stenshed; I Wikström; J A Nilsson; F A Wollheim Journal: Arthritis Care Res Date: 1997-10
Authors: Yvonne C Lee; Elena Massarotti; Robert R Edwards; Bing Lu; ChihChin Liu; Yuanyu Lo; Alyssa Wohlfahrt; Nancy D Kim; Daniel J Clauw; Daniel H Solomon Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Gianluca Castelnuovo; Emanuele M Giusti; Gian Mauro Manzoni; Donatella Saviola; Arianna Gatti; Samantha Gabrielli; Marco Lacerenza; Giada Pietrabissa; Roberto Cattivelli; Chiara A M Spatola; Stefania Corti; Margherita Novelli; Valentina Villa; Andrea Cottini; Carlo Lai; Francesco Pagnini; Lorys Castelli; Mario Tavola; Riccardo Torta; Marco Arreghini; Loredana Zanini; Amelia Brunani; Paolo Capodaglio; Guido E D'Aniello; Federica Scarpina; Andrea Brioschi; Lorenzo Priano; Alessandro Mauro; Giuseppe Riva; Claudia Repetto; Camillo Regalia; Enrico Molinari; Paolo Notaro; Stefano Paolucci; Giorgio Sandrini; Susan G Simpson; Brenda Wiederhold; Stefano Tamburin Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2016-02-19
Authors: Mark A Lumley; Francis J Keefe; Angelia Mosley-Williams; John R Rice; Daphne McKee; Sandra J Waters; R Ty Partridge; Jennifer N Carty; Ainoa M Coltri; Anita Kalaj; Jay L Cohen; Lynn C Neely; Jennifer K Pahssen; Mark A Connelly; Yelena B Bouaziz; Paul A Riordan Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2014-05-26
Authors: Laura Kuusalo; Kari Puolakka; Hannu Kautiainen; Anna Karjalainen; Timo Malmi; Timo Yli-Kerttula; Marjatta Leirisalo-Repo; Vappu Rantalaiho Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2017-03-13 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: J Patermann; I Ehlebracht-König; G Lind-Albrecht; E Genth; A Reusch; R Küffner; U Müller-Ladner; J Braun Journal: Z Rheumatol Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 1.372