F Jacobi1, M Becker2, J Bretschneider2, S Müllender2, J Thom2, U Hapke3, W Maier4,5. 1. Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Psychologische Hochschule Berlin (PHB), Am Köllnischen Park 2, 10179, Berlin, Deutschland. f.jacobi@psychologische-hochschule.de. 2. Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Psychologische Hochschule Berlin (PHB), Am Köllnischen Park 2, 10179, Berlin, Deutschland. 3. Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin, Deutschland. 4. Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland. 5. Deutsches Zentrum für neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Bonn, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Due to the high burden attributed to mental disorders, an important purpose of a general healthcare system is to provide comprehensive medical specialist care that is both locally available and in line with demand; however, the density of outpatient physicians and psychotherapists significantly varies between regions in Germany. To verify if these variations reflect regional variations of morbidity rates, routine data of statutory health insurance companies are analyzed on a regular basis. But these administrative data directly depend on the actual regional health care supply. Hence, independent epidemiological data on prevalence rates of mental disorders could be a valuable supplement. METHODS: Analyses are based on prevalence rates of the representative epidemiological German health interview and examination survey and its mental health module (DEGS1-MH) as well as supplemental data from the German national and regional associations of statutory health insurance physicians. The associations between prevalence rates and density of outpatient physicians and psychotherapists were computed for the DEGS sample points, representing 139 different German districts. Transregional care provision for neighboring regions was taken into account. RESULTS: There were neither significant associations of regional density of outpatient physicians and psychotherapists with prevalence rates of mental disorders in general nor with prevalence rates of severe mental disorders; however, taking into account transregional care provision for neighboring regions the huge variability of provider density decreases. DISCUSSION: The regional inequality of physician and psychotherapist density cannot be explained by regional differences in treatment needs. The results indicate potential improvements in healthcare provision for mental disorders in Germany through the adaptation to actual morbidity rates; however, the definition of treatment needs in mental disorders requires further evaluation.
BACKGROUND: Due to the high burden attributed to mental disorders, an important purpose of a general healthcare system is to provide comprehensive medical specialist care that is both locally available and in line with demand; however, the density of outpatient physicians and psychotherapists significantly varies between regions in Germany. To verify if these variations reflect regional variations of morbidity rates, routine data of statutory health insurance companies are analyzed on a regular basis. But these administrative data directly depend on the actual regional health care supply. Hence, independent epidemiological data on prevalence rates of mental disorders could be a valuable supplement. METHODS: Analyses are based on prevalence rates of the representative epidemiological German health interview and examination survey and its mental health module (DEGS1-MH) as well as supplemental data from the German national and regional associations of statutory health insurance physicians. The associations between prevalence rates and density of outpatient physicians and psychotherapists were computed for the DEGS sample points, representing 139 different German districts. Transregional care provision for neighboring regions was taken into account. RESULTS: There were neither significant associations of regional density of outpatient physicians and psychotherapists with prevalence rates of mental disorders in general nor with prevalence rates of severe mental disorders; however, taking into account transregional care provision for neighboring regions the huge variability of provider density decreases. DISCUSSION: The regional inequality of physician and psychotherapist density cannot be explained by regional differences in treatment needs. The results indicate potential improvements in healthcare provision for mental disorders in Germany through the adaptation to actual morbidity rates; however, the definition of treatment needs in mental disorders requires further evaluation.
Authors: E Swart; C Stallmann; J Powietzka; S March Journal: Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 1.513
Authors: F Jacobi; M Höfler; J Strehle; S Mack; A Gerschler; L Scholl; M A Busch; U Maske; U Hapke; W Gaebel; W Maier; M Wagner; J Zielasek; H-U Wittchen Journal: Nervenarzt Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 1.214
Authors: H U Wittchen; F Jacobi; J Rehm; A Gustavsson; M Svensson; B Jönsson; J Olesen; C Allgulander; J Alonso; C Faravelli; L Fratiglioni; P Jennum; R Lieb; A Maercker; J van Os; M Preisig; L Salvador-Carulla; R Simon; H-C Steinhausen Journal: Eur Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 4.600
Authors: P Rattay; H Butschalowsky; A Rommel; F Prütz; S Jordan; E Nowossadeck; O Domanska; P Kamtsiuris Journal: Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 1.513
Authors: Frank Jacobi; Michael Höfler; Jens Siegert; Simon Mack; Anja Gerschler; Lucie Scholl; Markus A Busch; Ulfert Hapke; Ulrike Maske; Ingeburg Seiffert; Wolfgang Gaebel; Wolfgang Maier; Michael Wagner; Jürgen Zielasek; Hans-Ulrich Wittchen Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2014-04-11 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Eva Rothermund; Martina Michaelis; Marc N Jarczok; Elisabeth M Balint; Rahna Lange; Stephan Zipfel; Harald Gündel; Monika A Rieger; Florian Junne Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 3.390