Literature DB >> 24378509

Implications of radiation dose and exposed populations on radiation protection in the 21st century.

John D Boice1.   

Abstract

Radiation is in the public eye because of Fukushima, computed tomography examinations, airport screenings, and possible terrorist attacks. What if the Boston Marathon pressure cooker had also contained a radioactive source? Nuclear power may be on the resurgence. Because of the increasing uses of radiation, the increases in population exposures, and the increasing knowledge of radiation effects, constant vigilance is needed to keep up with the changing times. Psychosocial disorders associated with the inappropriate (but real) fear of radiation need to be recognized as radiation detriments. Radiation risk communication, radiation education, and communication must improve at all levels: to members of the public, to the media, to other scientists, and to radiation professionals. Stakeholders must continue to be involved in all radiation protection initiatives. Finally, we are at a crisis as the number of war babies (me) and baby boomers (you?) who are also radiation professionals continues its rapid decline, and there are few in the pipeline to fill the current and looming substantial need: "The old road is rapidly agin'" (Dylan). NCRP has begun the WARP initiative-Where Are the Radiation Professionals?-an attempt to rejuvenate the pipeline of future professionals before the trickle becomes tiny drops. A Workshop was held in July 2013 with government agencies, military, private sector, universities, White House representatives, and societies to develop a coordinated and national action plan. A "Manhattan Project" is needed to get us "Back to the Future" in terms of the funding levels that existed in years past that provided the necessary resources to train, engage, and retain (a.k.a., jobs) the radiation professionals needed for the nation. If we don't keep swimmin' (Disney's Nemo) we'll "sink like a stone" (Dylan).Introduction of Implications of Radiation Dose and Exposed Populations (Video 2:06, http://links.lww.com/HP/A25).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24378509     DOI: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  3 in total

1.  Mortality among military participants at the 1957 PLUMBBOB nuclear weapons test series and from leukemia among participants at the SMOKY test.

Authors:  Glyn G Caldwell; Matthew M Zack; Michael T Mumma; Henry Falk; Clark W Heath; John E Till; Heidi Chen; John D Boice
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 1.394

2.  The Use of Computerized Tomography Scans in Elective Knee and Hip Arthroplasty-What Do They Tell Us and at What Risk?

Authors:  Taylor D'Amore; Gregg Klein; Jess Lonner
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-05-05

3.  Potential for adult-based epidemiological studies to characterize overall cancer risks associated with a lifetime of CT scans.

Authors:  Igor Shuryak; Jay H Lubin; David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 2.841

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.