Literature DB >> 27354984

Diagnosing Pathological Prognostic Factors in Retinoblastoma: Correlation between Traditional Microscopy and Digital Slides.

Pablo Zoroquiain1, Patrick Logan2, Vasco Bravo-Filho2, Natalia Vila2, Samir Jabbour2, Maria Eugenia Orellana2, Miguel N Burnier2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: It was the aim of this study to determine the diagnostic accuracy of high-risk prognostic factors and morphological characteristics of retinoblastomas using digital whole slide images (WSI) generated by a scanner.
METHODS: Forty-seven H&E sections of glass slides with high-risk morphological features of retinoblastoma were analyzed. Slides were scanned as WSI and reviewed. The results were compared with those obtained after reviewing the slides using a regular microscope as the gold standard. McNemar's test (MT), the percentage of agreement (POA), and sensitivity (S) and specificity (Sp) were evaluated between WSI and conventional microscopy.
RESULTS: There were no differences with respect to multicentricity, growth type, rosette formation, choroidal invasion, anterior chamber invasion, extraocular extension, scleral extension, optic nerve invasion, necrosis, or Azzopardi effect between WSI analysis and light microscopy (MT, p = 1.0; POA = 100%; S = 100%, and Sp = 100%). Discordance was found in 1 case where calcification could not be found using WSI (MT, p = 1.00; POA = 97.9%; S = 100%, and Sp = 97.8%).
CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report using digital pathology (WSI) to evaluate prognostic factors in eyes containing retinoblastomas. Using WSI, the pathologist was able to detect high-risk morphological features in retinoblastoma. To date, WSI is an important tool, in particular for ophthalmic pathologists examining enucleation and exenteration specimens.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ocular pathology; Retinoblastoma; Virtual slides; Whole slide images

Year:  2015        PMID: 27354984      PMCID: PMC4913770          DOI: 10.1159/000381155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ocul Oncol Pathol        ISSN: 2296-4657


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of a virtual microscope laboratory to a regular microscope laboratory for teaching histology.

Authors:  T Harris; T Leaven; P Heidger; C Kreiter; J Duncan; F Dick
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  2001-02

2.  Randomized comparison of virtual microscopy and traditional glass microscopy in diagnostic accuracy among dermatology and pathology residents.

Authors:  Laine H Koch; James N Lampros; Laura K Delong; Suephy C Chen; John T Woosley; Antoinette F Hood
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 3.466

3.  Canadian licensure for the use of digital pathology for routine diagnoses: one more step toward a new era of pathology practice without borders.

Authors:  Bernard Têtu; Andrew Evans
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 5.534

4.  Digital pathology consultations-a new era in digital imaging, challenges and practical applications.

Authors:  Gonzalo Romero Lauro; William Cable; Andrew Lesniak; Eugene Tseytlin; Jeff McHugh; Anil Parwani; Liron Pantanowitz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Digital pathology evaluation in the multicenter Nephrotic Syndrome Study Network (NEPTUNE).

Authors:  Laura Barisoni; Cynthia C Nast; J Charles Jennette; Jeffrey B Hodgin; Andrew M Herzenberg; Kevin V Lemley; Catherine M Conway; Jeffrey B Kopp; Matthias Kretzler; Christa Lienczewski; Carmen Avila-Casado; Serena Bagnasco; Sanjeev Sethi; John Tomaszewski; Adil H Gasim; Stephen M Hewitt
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Whole slide imaging diagnostic concordance with light microscopy for breast needle biopsies.

Authors:  W Scott Campbell; Steven H Hinrichs; Subodh M Lele; John J Baker; Audrey J Lazenby; Geoffrey A Talmon; Lynette M Smith; William W West
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.466

7.  Trends in incidence of childhood cancer in Canada, 1992-2006.

Authors:  D Mitra; A K Shaw; K Hutchings
Journal:  Chronic Dis Inj Can       Date:  2012-06

8.  Proceedings of the consensus meetings from the International Retinoblastoma Staging Working Group on the pathology guidelines for the examination of enucleated eyes and evaluation of prognostic risk factors in retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Xavier Sastre; Guillermo L Chantada; François Doz; Matthew W Wilson; Maria T G de Davila; Carlos Rodríguez-Galindo; Murali Chintagumpala; Patricia Chévez-Barrios
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 9.  Validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes in pathology: guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center.

Authors:  Liron Pantanowitz; John H Sinard; Walter H Henricks; Lisa A Fatheree; Alexis B Carter; Lydia Contis; Bruce A Beckwith; Andrew J Evans; Avtar Lal; Anil V Parwani
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 5.534

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Clinicopathological Findings of Retinoblastoma: A 10-Year Experience from a Tertiary Hospital in Kampala, Uganda.

Authors:  James Joseph Yahaya; Belson Rugwizangoga; Alex Mremi; Asafu Munema
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-16       Impact factor: 1.909

2.  Histopathological analysis of residual lens cells in capsular opacities after cataract surgery using objective software.

Authors:  Christina Mastromonaco; Matthew Balazsi; Jacqueline Coblentz; Ana Beatriz Toledo Dias; Pablo Zoroquiain; Miguel N Burnier
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.969

Review 3.  Lost in digitization - A systematic review about the diagnostic test accuracy of digital pathology solutions.

Authors:  Olsi Kusta; Charlotte Vestrup Rift; Torsten Risør; Eric Santoni-Rugiu; John Brandt Brodersen
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2022-09-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.