Literature DB >> 26081176

Reappraisal of Nodal Staging and Study of Lymph Node Station Involvement in Pancreaticoduodenectomy with the Standard International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery Definition of Lymphadenectomy for Cancer.

Giuseppe Malleo1, Laura Maggino2, Paola Capelli3, Francesco Gulino2, Silvia Segattini2, Aldo Scarpa4, Claudio Bassi2, Giovanni Butturini2, Roberto Salvia2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic role of lymph node (LN) dissection in pancreatic head ductal adenocarcinoma is still unclear. This study reappraised the value of the number of positive LNs and LN ratio in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy with standard lymphadenectomy according to the recent International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definition. In addition, the impact of nodal metastases stratified by LN stations was investigated. STUDY
DESIGN: After reviewing retrospectively clinical and pathologic data of 758 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic head ductal adenocarcinoma performed from 2002 through 2011, we extracted patients in whom the LN stations included in the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definition had been sampled. Survival analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate models.
RESULTS: The study population consisted of 255 patients. Mean number of harvested LNs was 30.8. Factors with a significant prognostic impact on multivariate analysis were tumor grade, adjuvant therapy, number of positive LNs, LN metastases along station 14a-b (proximal superior mesenteric artery), and the number of metastatic LN stations. Patients with involvement of station 14a-b exhibited worse pathologic features, indicating more aggressive disease.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients receiving a uniform LN dissection, the number of positive LNs is superior to LN ratio for predicting survival. Lymph node metastases along the proximal superior mesenteric artery have a significant prognostic value, and an increasing number of metastatic stations are associated with a sharp decrease in survival. In future studies, clarification of the pattern of LN metastasis spread could offer valuable insight into the optimal treatment strategies, including selection of patients for neoadjuvant therapies.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26081176     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.02.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  28 in total

1.  Lymph node ratio as parameter of regional lymph node involvement in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Suguru Yamada; Tsutomu Fujii; Akihiro Hirakawa; Mitsuro Kanda; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Para-Aortic Dissection in Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Mesopancreas Excision for Pancreatic Head Carcinoma: Not Only an N-Staging Matter.

Authors:  Nadia Peparini
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Positive para-aortic lymph nodes following pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Systematic review and meta-analysis of impact on short term survival and association with clinicopathologic features.

Authors:  Christos Agalianos; Nikolaos Gouvas; Kleo Papaparaskeva; Christos Dervenis
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  The American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition staging system for the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: is it better than the 7th edition?

Authors:  Dong Woo Shin; Jaihwan Kim
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 7.293

5.  Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Metastasis and Micrometastasis Along the Left Side of Superior Mesenteric Artery in Pancreatic Head Cancer.

Authors:  Kenjiro Okada; Yoshiaki Murakami; Naru Kondo; Kenichiro Uemura; Naoya Nakagawa; Shingo Seo; Shinya Takahashi; Taijiro Sueda
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  A Comprehensive Assessment of Accurate Lymph Node Staging and Preoperative Detection in Resected Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Toshiro Masuda; Amanda M Dann; Irmina A Elliott; Hideo Baba; Stephen Kim; Alireza Sedarat; V Raman Muthusamy; Mark D Girgis; O Joe Hines; Howard A Reber; Timothy R Donahue
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  A systematic review of the prognostic value of lymph node ratio, number of positive nodes and total nodes examined in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  M Elshaer; G Gravante; M Kosmin; A Riaz; A Al-Bahrani
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Pancreatectomy with Para-Aortic Lymph Node Dissection for Pancreatic Head Adenocarcinoma: Pattern of Nodal Metastasis Spread and Analysis of Prognostic Factors.

Authors:  Salvatore Paiella; Giuseppe Malleo; Laura Maggino; Claudio Bassi; Roberto Salvia; Giovanni Butturini
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Prognostic value of lymph node metastases detected during surgical exploration for pancreatic or periampullary cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lennart B van Rijssen; Poorvi Narwade; Nadine C M van Huijgevoort; Dorine S J Tseng; Hjalmar C van Santvoort; Isaac Q Molenaar; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Casper H J van Eijck; Olivier R C Busch; Marc G H Besselink
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Role of lymphadenectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and treatment at high-volume centers in patients with resected pancreatic cancer-a distinct view on lymph node yield.

Authors:  Rene Warschkow; Catherine Tsai; Nastassja Köhn; Suna Erdem; Bruno Schmied; Daniel P Nussbaum; Beat Gloor; Sascha A Müller; Dan Blazer; Mathias Worni
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.