Literature DB >> 27345656

Added Value of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Postscreening Assessment.

Anne-Marie Tardivel1, Corinne Balleyguier1,2, Ariane Dunant3, Suzette Delaloge4, Chafika Mazouni5, Marie-Christine Mathieu6, Clarisse Dromain1.   

Abstract

To assess the value on diagnostic and treatment management of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM), as adjunct to mammography (MG) and ultrasound (US) in postscreening in a breast cancer unit for patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer or with suspicious findings on conventional imaging. Retrospective review of routine use of bilateral CESM performed between September 2012 and September 2013 in 195 women with suspicious or undetermined findings on MG and/or US. CESM images were blindly reviewed by two radiologists for BI-RADS(®) assessment and probability of malignancy. Each lesion was definitely confirmed either with histopathology or follow-up. Two hundred and ninety-nine lesions were detected (221 malignant). CESM sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value and negative-predictive value were 94% (CI: 89-96%), 74% (CI: 63-83%), 91% (CI: 86-94%) and 81% (CI: 70-89%), respectively, with 18 false positive and 14 false negative. CESM changed diagnostic and treatment strategy in 41 (21%) patients either after detection of additional malignant lesions in 38 patients (19%)-with a more extensive surgery (n = 21) or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 1)-or avoiding further biopsy for 20 patients with negative CESM. CESM can be performed easily in a clinical assessment after positive breast cancer screening and may change significantly the diagnostic and treatment strategy through breast cancer staging.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  angiogenesis; breast cancer; contrast; digital mammography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27345656     DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  10 in total

1.  Can Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) Reduce Benign Breast Biopsy?

Authors:  Amanda Ling Fung Liew; Hollie Mei Yeen Lim; Elizabeth Chun Mei Fok; Siu Cheng Loke; Ern Yu Tan; Bee Kiang Chong; Yeong Shyan Lee; Patrick Mun Yew Chan; Niketa Chotai
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 2.269

2.  Quantitative contrast-enhanced spectral mammography based on photon-counting detectors: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Quantitative analysis of enhanced malignant and benign lesions on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography.

Authors:  Chih-Ying Deng; Yu-Hsiang Juan; Yun-Chung Cheung; Yu-Ching Lin; Yung-Feng Lo; GiGin Lin; Shin-Cheh Chen; Shu-Hang Ng
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Added value of contrast-enhanced mammography in assessment of breast asymmetries.

Authors:  Rasha Wessam; Mohammed Mohammed Mohammed Gomaa; Mona Ahmed Fouad; Sherif Mohamed Mokhtar; Yasmin Mounir Tohamey
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Contrast-enhanced Mammography: State of the Art.

Authors:  Maxine S Jochelson; Marc B I Lobbes
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Mammography: an update of the EUSOBI recommendations on information for women.

Authors:  Francesco Sardanelli; Eva M Fallenberg; Paola Clauser; Rubina M Trimboli; Julia Camps-Herrero; Thomas H Helbich; Gabor Forrai
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2016-11-16

7.  Added value of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in staging of malignant breast lesions-a feasibility study.

Authors:  Kristina Åhsberg; Anna Gardfjell; Emma Nimeus; Rogvi Rasmussen; Catharina Behmer; Sophia Zackrisson; Lisa Ryden
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Screening Women after Breast Conserving Surgery.

Authors:  Jill Gluskin; Carolina Rossi Saccarelli; Daly Avendano; Maria Adele Marino; Almir G V Bitencourt; Melissa Pilewskie; Varadan Sevilimedu; Janice S Sung; Katja Pinker; Maxine S Jochelson
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  The PROCEM study protocol: Added value of preoperative contrast-enhanced mammography in staging of malignant breast lesions - a prospective randomized multicenter study.

Authors:  Lisa Ryden; Sophia Zackrisson; Kristina Åhsberg; Anna Gardfjell; Emma Nimeus
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  A meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Wanqing Xiang; Haiying Rao; Liyu Zhou
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 3.500

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.