Literature DB >> 33650905

Contrast-enhanced Mammography: State of the Art.

Maxine S Jochelson1, Marc B I Lobbes1.   

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) has emerged as a viable alternative to contrast-enhanced breast MRI, and it may increase access to vascular imaging while reducing examination cost. Intravenous iodinated contrast materials are used in CEM to enhance the visualization of tumor neovascularity. After injection, imaging is performed with dual-energy digital mammography, which helps provide a low-energy image and a recombined or iodine image that depict enhancing lesions in the breast. CEM has been demonstrated to help improve accuracy compared with digital mammography and US in women with abnormal screening mammographic findings or symptoms of breast cancer. It has also been demonstrated to approach the accuracy of breast MRI in preoperative staging of patients with breast cancer and in monitoring response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. There are early encouraging results from trials evaluating CEM in the screening of women who are at an increased risk of breast cancer. Although CEM is a promising tool, it slightly increases radiation dose and carries a small risk of adverse reactions to contrast materials. This review details the CEM technique, diagnostic and screening uses, and future applications, including artificial intelligence and radiomics. © RSNA, 2021.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33650905      PMCID: PMC7997616          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021201948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  53 in total

Review 1.  The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice.

Authors:  Christiane Kuhl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Radiomics Analysis for Noninvasive Breast Cancer Characterization: Initial Results.

Authors:  Maria Adele Marino; Katja Pinker; Doris Leithner; Janice Sung; Daly Avendano; Elizabeth A Morris; Maxine Jochelson
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography is Comparable to MRI in the Assessment of Residual Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy.

Authors:  Bhavika K Patel; Talal Hilal; Matthew Covington; Nan Zhang; Heidi E Kosiorek; Marc Lobbes; Donald W Northfelt; Barbara A Pockaj
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Performance of Dual-Energy Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography for Screening Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Janice S Sung; Lizza Lebron; Delia Keating; Donna D'Alessio; Christopher E Comstock; Carol H Lee; Malcolm C Pike; Miranda Ayhan; Chaya S Moskowitz; Elizabeth A Morris; Maxine S Jochelson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Breast Cancers Detected at Screening MR Imaging and Mammography in Patients at High Risk: Method of Detection Reflects Tumor Histopathologic Results.

Authors:  Janice S Sung; Sarah Stamler; Jennifer Brooks; Jennifer Kaplan; Tammy Huang; D David Dershaw; Carol H Lee; Elizabeth A Morris; Christopher E Comstock
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Women With Intermediate Breast Cancer Risk and Dense Breasts.

Authors:  Vera Sorin; Yael Yagil; Ady Yosepovich; Anat Shalmon; Michael Gotlieb; Osnat Halshtok Neiman; Miri Sklair-Levy
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  The quality of tumor size assessment by contrast-enhanced spectral mammography and the benefit of additional breast MRI.

Authors:  Marc B I Lobbes; Ulrich C Lalji; Patty J Nelemans; Ivo Houben; Marjolein L Smidt; Esther Heuts; Bart de Vries; Joachim E Wildberger; Regina G Beets-Tan
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 8.  Artefacts in contrast enhanced digital mammography: how can they affect diagnostic image quality and confuse clinical diagnosis?

Authors:  Jacopo Nori; Maninderpal Kaur Gill; Chiara Vignoli; Giulia Bicchierai; Diego De Benedetto; Federica Di Naro; Ermanno Vanzi; Cecilia Boeri; Vittorio Miele
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2020-02-07

9.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing residual disease and pathologic complete response in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a systematic review.

Authors:  M B I Lobbes; R Prevos; M Smidt; V C G Tjan-Heijnen; M van Goethem; R Schipper; R G Beets-Tan; J E Wildberger
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2013-01-29

10.  Dual-Energy Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography: Enhancement Analysis on BI-RADS 4 Non-Mass Microcalcifications in Screened Women.

Authors:  Yun-Chung Cheung; Yu-Hsiang Juan; Yu-Ching Lin; Yung-Feng Lo; Hsiu-Pei Tsai; Shir-Hwa Ueng; Shin-Cheh Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  15 in total

1.  Contrast-enhanced Mammography: An Emerging Modality in Breast Imaging.

Authors:  Manisha Bahl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy: technical feasibility and first outcomes.

Authors:  R Alcantara; V Iotti; M Posso; M Pitarch; N Arenas; B Ejarque; G Besutti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 7.034

3.  Contrast-enhanced mammography for the assessment of screening recalls: a two-centre study.

Authors:  Andrea Cozzi; Simone Schiaffino; Marianna Fanizza; Veronica Magni; Laura Menicagli; Cristian Giuseppe Monaco; Adrienn Benedek; Diana Spinelli; Giovanni Di Leo; Giuseppe Di Giulio; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 7.034

Review 4.  The Impact of Dense Breasts on the Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis: A Review and Options for Supplemental Screening.

Authors:  Paula B Gordon
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced 2D mammography in everyday clinical use.

Authors:  L M F H Neeter; H P J Raat; S D Meens-Koreman; R S A van Stiphout; S M E C Timmermans; K M Duvivier; M L Smidt; J E Wildberger; P J Nelemans; M B I Lobbes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Radiation Dose of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: A Two-Center Prospective Comparison.

Authors:  Gisella Gennaro; Andrea Cozzi; Simone Schiaffino; Francesco Sardanelli; Francesca Caumo
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Persistent post-galactogram intraductal iodinated contrast detected on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in a patient with nipple discharge.

Authors:  Shao Zun Chen; Timothy B Rooney; Matthew M Miller
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2022-02-03

8.  Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM)-guided breast biopsy as an alternative to MRI-guided biopsy.

Authors:  Jonathan James
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.629

9.  Diagnostic performance of perilesional radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced mammography for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.

Authors:  Simin Wang; Yuqi Sun; Ruimin Li; Ning Mao; Qin Li; Tingting Jiang; Qianqian Chen; Shaofeng Duan; Haizhu Xie; Yajia Gu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  The Usefulness of Spectral Mammography in Surgical Planning of Breast Cancer Treatment-Analysis of 999 Patients with Primary Operable Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Andrzej Lorek; Katarzyna Steinhof-Radwańska; Anna Barczyk-Gutkowska; Wojciech Zarębski; Piotr Paleń; Karol Szyluk; Joanna Lorek; Anna Grażyńska; Paweł Niemiec; Iwona Gisterek
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.