Literature DB >> 23276358

Modified plate-only open-door laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical stenotic myelopathy.

Lili Yang1, Yifei Gu, Jueqian Shi, Rui Gao, Yang Liu, Jun Li, Wen Yuan.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare modified plate-only laminoplasty and laminectomy and fusion to confirm which of the 2 surgical modalities could achieve a better decompression outcome and whether a significant difference was found in postoperative complications. Clinical data were retrospectively reviewed for 141 patients with cervical stenotic myelopathy who underwent plate-only laminoplasty and laminectomy and fusion between November 2007 and June 2010. The extent of decompression was assessed by measuring the cross-sectional area of the dural sac and the distance of spinal cord drift at the 3 most narrowed levels on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical outcomes and complications were also recorded and compared. Significant enlargement of the dural sac area and spinal cord drift was achieved and well maintained in both groups, but the extent of decompression was greater in patients who underwent laminectomy and fusion; however, a greater decompression did not seem to produce a better clinical outcome. No significant difference was observed in Japanese Orthopaedic Association and Nurick scores between the 2 groups. Patients who underwent plate-only laminoplasty showed a better improvement in Neck Dysfunction Index and visual analog scale scores. In addition, limited decompression, rigid reconstruction of the spinal canal, and preservation of cervical mobility combined with preservation of the posterior structure resulted in a lower rate of postoperative C5 palsy and axial pain in the modified laminoplasty group. For this reason, modified laminoplasty may be a more viable option for patients with cervical stenotic myelopathy. Copyright 2013, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23276358     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20121217-23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  32 in total

1.  Open Door Laminoplasty: Creation Of A New Vertebral Arch.

Authors:  Monica Lara-Almunia; Javier Hernandez-Vicente
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-02-09

2.  Prevalence of axial symptoms after posterior cervical decompression: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Miao Wang; Xiao Ji Luo; Qian Xing Deng; Jia Hong Li; Nan Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Relationship between the laminoplasty opening size and the laminoplasty opening angle, increased sagittal canal diameter and the prediction of spinal canal expansion following open-door cervical laminoplasty.

Authors:  Zhenfang Gu; Aili Zhang; Yong Shen; Feng Li; Xianze Sun; Wenyuan Ding
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Posterior decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ping Xu; Guo-Dong Sun; Lu Xun; Shi-Shu Huang; Zhi-Zhong Li
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  C5 palsy after insertion of a winged expandable cervical cage: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Lorenzo Nigro; Roberto Tarantino; Pasquale Donnarumma; Antonio Santoro; Roberto Delfini
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

6.  Prevalence of C5 nerve root palsy after cervical decompressive surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fenyong Shou; Zhe Li; Huan Wang; Chongnan Yan; Qi Liu; Chi Xiao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Clinical analysis of C5 palsy after cervical decompression surgery: relationship between recovery duration and clinical and radiological factors.

Authors:  Chae-Hong Lim; Sung-Woo Roh; Seung-Chul Rhim; Sang-Ryong Jeon
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Laminectomy and fusion vs laminoplasty for multi-level cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Daniel B Scherman; Joshua Xu; Vannessa Leung; Sohaib Virk; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  C5 nerve root palsy following decompression of cervical spine with anterior versus posterior types of procedures in patients with cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Recep Basaran; Tuncay Kaner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  So Kato; Michael Fehlings
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.