Literature DB >> 27342565

Editing of the Bacillus subtilis Genome by the CRISPR-Cas9 System.

Josef Altenbuchner1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-associated (Cas) systems are adaptive immune systems of bacteria. A type II CRISPR-Cas9 system from Streptococcus pyogenes has recently been developed into a genome engineering tool for prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Here, we present a single-plasmid system which allows efficient genome editing of Bacillus subtilis The plasmid pJOE8999 is a shuttle vector that has a pUC minimal origin of replication for Escherichia coli, the temperature-sensitive replication origin of plasmid pE194(ts) for B. subtilis, and a kanamycin resistance gene working in both organisms. For genome editing, it carries the cas9 gene under the control of the B. subtilis mannose-inducible promoter PmanP and a single guide RNA (sgRNA)-encoding sequence transcribed via a strong promoter. This sgRNA guides the Cas9 nuclease to its target. The 20-nucleotide spacer sequence at the 5' end of the sgRNA sequence, responsible for target specificity, is located between BsaI sites. Thus, the target specificity is altered by changing the spacer sequences via oligonucleotides fitted between the BsaI sites. Cas9 in complex with the sgRNA induces double-strand breaks (DSBs) at its target site. Repair of the DSBs and the required modification of the genome are achieved by adding homology templates, usually two PCR fragments obtained from both sides of the target sequence. Two adjacent SfiI sites enable the ordered integration of these homology templates into the vector. The function of the CRISPR-Cas9 vector was demonstrated by introducing two large deletions in the B. subtilis chromosome and by repair of the trpC2 mutation of B. subtilis 168. IMPORTANCE: In prokaryotes, most methods used for scarless genome engineering are based on selection-counterselection systems. The disadvantages are often the lack of a suitable counterselection marker, the toxicity of the compounds needed for counterselection, and the requirement of certain mutations in the target strain. CRISPR-Cas systems were recently developed as important tools for genome editing. The single-plasmid system constructed for the genome editing of B. subtilis overcomes the problems of counterselection methods. It allows deletions and introduction of point mutations. It is easy to handle and very efficient, and it may be adapted for use in other firmicutes.
Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27342565      PMCID: PMC4988203          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01453-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  43 in total

1.  REQUIREMENTS FOR TRANSFORMATION IN BACILLUS SUBTILIS.

Authors:  C Anagnostopoulos; J Spizizen
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1961-05       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Coupling the CRISPR/Cas9 System with Lambda Red Recombineering Enables Simplified Chromosomal Gene Replacement in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Michael E Pyne; Murray Moo-Young; Duane A Chung; C Perry Chou
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Lambda replacement vectors carrying polylinker sequences.

Authors:  A M Frischauf; H Lehrach; A Poustka; N Murray
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1983-11-15       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Characterization of a mannose utilization system in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Tianqi Sun; Josef Altenbuchner
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  One step assembly of multiple DNA fragments with a designed order and orientation in Bacillus subtilis plasmid.

Authors:  Kenji Tsuge; Kuniko Matsui; Mitsuhiro Itaya
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Development of a markerless gene deletion system for Bacillus subtilis based on the mannose phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system.

Authors:  Marian Wenzel; Josef Altenbuchner
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 2.777

7.  CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III.

Authors:  Elitza Deltcheva; Krzysztof Chylinski; Cynthia M Sharma; Karine Gonzales; Yanjie Chao; Zaid A Pirzada; Maria R Eckert; Jörg Vogel; Emmanuelle Charpentier
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  A CRISPR view of development.

Authors:  Melissa M Harrison; Brian V Jenkins; Kate M O'Connor-Giles; Jill Wildonger
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Genome engineering using a synthetic gene circuit in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Da-Eun Jeong; Seung-Hwan Park; Jae-Gu Pan; Eui-Joong Kim; Soo-Keun Choi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems.

Authors:  Wenyan Jiang; David Bikard; David Cox; Feng Zhang; Luciano A Marraffini
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  65 in total

1.  Immediate, multiplexed and sequential genome engineering facilitated by CRISPR/Cas9 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Zhen-Hai Li; Hao Meng; Bin Ma; Xinyi Tao; Min Liu; Feng-Qing Wang; Dong-Zhi Wei
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Synthetic microbial consortia for biosynthesis and biodegradation: promises and challenges.

Authors:  Shun Che; Yujie Men
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Reprogramming Halomonas for industrial production of chemicals.

Authors:  Xiangbin Chen; Linping Yu; Guanqing Qiao; Guo-Qiang Chen
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  Deciphering the essentiality and function of the anti-σM factors in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Heng Zhao; Daniel M Roistacher; John D Helmann
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 5.  Recent advances in CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome editing in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Kun-Qiang Hong; Ding-Yu Liu; Tao Chen; Zhi-Wen Wang
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  MutS2 Promotes Homologous Recombination in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Peter E Burby; Lyle A Simmons
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Two Ways To Convert a Low-Affinity Potassium Channel to High Affinity: Control of Bacillus subtilis KtrCD by Glutamate.

Authors:  Larissa Krüger; Christina Herzberg; Robert Warneke; Anja Poehlein; Janina Stautz; Martin Weiß; Rolf Daniel; Inga Hänelt; Jörg Stülke
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 8.  Barriers to genome editing with CRISPR in bacteria.

Authors:  Justin M Vento; Nathan Crook; Chase L Beisel
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.346

9.  The Mechanism of Bidirectional pH Taxis in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Payman Tohidifar; Matthew J Plutz; George W Ordal; Christopher V Rao
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Novel Modifications of Nonribosomal Peptides from Brevibacillus laterosporus MG64 and Investigation of Their Mode of Action.

Authors:  Zhibo Li; Reinder H de Vries; Parichita Chakraborty; Chunxu Song; Xinghong Zhao; Dirk-Jan Scheffers; Gerard Roelfes; Oscar P Kuipers
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.