Literature DB >> 31165970

Barriers to genome editing with CRISPR in bacteria.

Justin M Vento1, Nathan Crook1, Chase L Beisel2,3,4.   

Abstract

Genome editing is essential for probing genotype-phenotype relationships and for enhancing chemical production and phenotypic robustness in industrial bacteria. Currently, the most popular tools for genome editing couple recombineering with DNA cleavage by the CRISPR nuclease Cas9 from Streptococcus pyogenes. Although successful in some model strains, CRISPR-based genome editing has been slow to extend to the multitude of industrially relevant bacteria. In this review, we analyze existing barriers to implementing CRISPR-based editing across diverse bacterial species. We first compare the efficacy of current CRISPR-based editing strategies. Next, we discuss alternatives when the S. pyogenes Cas9 does not yield colonies. Finally, we describe different ways bacteria can evade editing and how elucidating these failure modes can improve CRISPR-based genome editing across strains. Together, this review highlights existing obstacles to CRISPR-based editing in bacteria and offers guidelines to help achieve and enhance editing in a wider range of bacterial species, including non-model strains.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacteria; CRISPR; Genome editing; Nuclease; Recombineering

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31165970      PMCID: PMC7301779          DOI: 10.1007/s10295-019-02195-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1367-5435            Impact factor:   3.346


  103 in total

Review 1.  Characterization and Repurposing of Type I and Type II CRISPR-Cas Systems in Bacteria.

Authors:  Claudio Hidalgo-Cantabrana; Yong Jun Goh; Rodolphe Barrangou
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Managing the SOS Response for Enhanced CRISPR-Cas-Based Recombineering in E. coli through Transient Inhibition of Host RecA Activity.

Authors:  Eirik Adim Moreb; Benjamin Hoover; Adam Yaseen; Nisakorn Valyasevi; Zoe Roecker; Romel Menacho-Melgar; Michael D Lynch
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 5.110

Review 3.  Emerging Approaches for Spatiotemporal Control of Targeted Genome with Inducible CRISPR-Cas9.

Authors:  Yuta Nihongaki; Takahiro Otabe; Moritoshi Sato
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Genome engineering of Clostridium difficile using the CRISPR-Cas9 system.

Authors:  S Wang; W Hong; S Dong; Z-T Zhang; J Zhang; L Wang; Y Wang
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 8.067

5.  Repurposing endogenous type I CRISPR-Cas systems for programmable gene repression.

Authors:  Michelle L Luo; Adam S Mullis; Ryan T Leenay; Chase L Beisel
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  CRISPR-Cas12a-Assisted Recombineering in Bacteria.

Authors:  Mei-Yi Yan; Hai-Qin Yan; Gai-Xian Ren; Ju-Ping Zhao; Xiao-Peng Guo; Yi-Cheng Sun
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects.

Authors:  Benjamin P Kleinstiver; Vikram Pattanayak; Michelle S Prew; Shengdar Q Tsai; Nhu T Nguyen; Zongli Zheng; J Keith Joung
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  CRMAGE: CRISPR Optimized MAGE Recombineering.

Authors:  Carlotta Ronda; Lasse Ebdrup Pedersen; Morten O A Sommer; Alex Toftgaard Nielsen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Targeted Large-Scale Deletion of Bacterial Genomes Using CRISPR-Nickases.

Authors:  Kylie Standage-Beier; Qi Zhang; Xiao Wang
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2015-10-25       Impact factor: 5.110

10.  A rapid and versatile tool for genomic engineering in Lactococcus lactis.

Authors:  Tingting Guo; Yongping Xin; Yi Zhang; Xinyi Gu; Jian Kong
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 5.328

View more
  20 in total

1.  Ranking essential bacterial processes by speed of mutant death.

Authors:  Larry A Gallagher; Jeannie Bailey; Colin Manoil
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Recent Developments in Bioprocessing of Recombinant Proteins: Expression Hosts and Process Development.

Authors:  Nagesh K Tripathi; Ambuj Shrivastava
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-12-20

3.  CRISPR RNA-guided integrases for high-efficiency, multiplexed bacterial genome engineering.

Authors:  Phuc Leo H Vo; Carlotta Ronda; Sanne E Klompe; Ethan E Chen; Christopher Acree; Harris H Wang; Samuel H Sternberg
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Assembly of Long-Adapter Single-Strand Oligonucleotide (LASSO) Probes for Massively Parallel Capture of Kilobase Size DNA Targets.

Authors:  Lamia Chkaiban; Lorenzo Tosi; Biju Parekkadan
Journal:  Curr Protoc       Date:  2021-11

Review 5.  Reprogramming Microbial CO2-Metabolizing Chassis With CRISPR-Cas Systems.

Authors:  Hai-Yan Yu; Shu-Guang Wang; Peng-Fei Xia
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-23

6.  Efficient genome editing of an extreme thermophile, Thermus thermophilus, using a thermostable Cas9 variant.

Authors:  Bjorn Thor Adalsteinsson; Thordis Kristjansdottir; William Merre; Alexandra Helleux; Julia Dusaucy; Mathilde Tourigny; Olafur Fridjonsson; Gudmundur Oli Hreggvidsson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  CRISPR-Cas9-mediated pinpoint microbial genome editing aided by target-mismatched sgRNAs.

Authors:  Ho Joung Lee; Hyun Ju Kim; Sang Jun Lee
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 8.  Emerging Species and Genome Editing Tools: Future Prospects in Cyanobacterial Synthetic Biology.

Authors:  Grant A R Gale; Alejandra A Schiavon Osorio; Lauren A Mills; Baojun Wang; David J Lea-Smith; Alistair J McCormick
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-09-29

9.  High-Efficiency Genome Editing Based on Endogenous CRISPR-Cas System Enhances Cell Growth and Lactic Acid Production in Pediococcus acidilactici.

Authors:  Ling Liu; Danlu Yang; Zhiyu Zhang; Tao Liu; Guoquan Hu; Mingxiong He; Shumiao Zhao; Nan Peng
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Bacterial genome editing by coupling Cre-lox and CRISPR-Cas9 systems.

Authors:  Hualan Liu; David S Robinson; Zong-Yen Wu; Rita Kuo; Yasuo Yoshikuni; Ian K Blaby; Jan-Fang Cheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.