Literature DB >> 27337027

Prevalence, Clinical Management, and Natural Course of Incidental Findings on Brain MR Images: The Population-based Rotterdam Scan Study.

Daniel Bos1, Marielle M F Poels1, Hieab H H Adams1, Saloua Akoudad1, Lotte G M Cremers1, Hazel I Zonneveld1, Yoo Y Hoogendam1, Benjamin F J Verhaaren1, Vincent J A Verlinden1, Jasper G J Verbruggen1, Abbas Peymani1, Albert Hofman1, Gabriel P Krestin1, Arnaud J Vincent1, Richard A Feelders1, Peter J Koudstaal1, Aad van der Lugt1, M Arfan Ikram1, Meike W Vernooij1.   

Abstract

Purpose To present an updated prevalence estimate for incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance (MR) images and provide information on clinical relevance, including natural course, over a period of up to 9 years. Materials and Methods This study was approved by the institutional review board and all participants gave informed consent. In a prospective population-based setting, structural brain MR imaging was performed in 5800 participants (mean age, 64.9 years; 3194 women [55.1%]). Trained reviewers recorded abnormalities, which were subsequently evaluated by neuroradiologists. The prevalence with 95% confidence interval (CI) of incidental findings was determined, and clinical management of findings that required the attention of a medical specialist was followed. Follow-up imaging in the study context provided information on the natural course of findings that were not referred. Results In 549 of 5800 participants (9.5% [95% CI: 8.7%, 10.3%]), incidental findings were found, of which meningiomas (143 of 5800; 2.5% [95% CI: 2.1%, 2.9%]) and cerebral aneurysms (134 of 5800; 2.3% [95% CI: 2.0%, 2.7%]) were most common. A total of 188 participants were referred to medical specialists for incidental findings (3.2% [95% CI: 2.8%, 3.7%]). Of these, 144 (76.6% [95% CI: 70.1%, 82.1%]) either underwent a wait-and-see policy or were discharged after the initial clinical visit. The majority of meningiomas and virtually all aneurysms not referred or referred but untreated remained stable in size during follow-up. Conclusion Incidental findings at brain MR imaging that necessitate further diagnostic evaluation occur in over 3% of the general middle-aged and elderly population, but are mostly without direct clinical consequences. © RSNA, 2016.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27337027     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016160218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  32 in total

Review 1.  Cavernous angiomas: deconstructing a neurosurgical disease.

Authors:  Issam A Awad; Sean P Polster
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Incidental extracerebral findings on brain nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging: frequency, nondetection rate, and clinical importance.

Authors:  Ming-Liang Wang; Li-Yan Lu; Xiao-Er Wei; Wen-Bin Li
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 3.  Cerebrovascular disorders associated with genetic lesions.

Authors:  Philipp Karschnia; Sayoko Nishimura; Angeliki Louvi
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Prevalence of Potentially Clinically Significant Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Athletes with and without Sport-Related Concussion.

Authors:  Andrew P Klein; Julie E Tetzlaff; Joshua M Bonis; Lindsay D Nelson; Andrew R Mayer; Daniel L Huber; Jaroslaw Harezlak; Vincent P Mathews; John L Ulmer; Grant P Sinson; Andrew S Nencka; Kevin M Koch; Yu-Chien Wu; Andrew J Saykin; John P DiFiori; Christopher C Giza; Joshua Goldman; Kevin M Guskiewicz; Jason P Mihalik; Stefan M Duma; Steven Rowson; Alison Brooks; Steven P Broglio; Thomas McAllister; Michael A McCrea; Timothy B Meier
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  The Rotterdam Study: 2018 update on objectives, design and main results.

Authors:  M Arfan Ikram; Guy G O Brusselle; Sarwa Darwish Murad; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; André Goedegebure; Caroline C W Klaver; Tamar E C Nijsten; Robin P Peeters; Bruno H Stricker; Henning Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij; Albert Hofman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Population-Based Prevalence of Cerebral Cavernous Malformations in Older Adults: Mayo Clinic Study of Aging.

Authors:  Kelly D Flemming; Jonathan Graff-Radford; Jeremiah Aakre; Kejal Kantarci; Giuseppe Lanzino; Robert D Brown; Michelle M Mielke; Rosebud O Roberts; Walter Kremers; David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 18.302

7.  Trial Readiness in Cavernous Angiomas With Symptomatic Hemorrhage (CASH).

Authors:  Sean P Polster; Ying Cao; Timothy Carroll; Kelly Flemming; Romuald Girard; Daniel Hanley; Nicholas Hobson; Helen Kim; James Koenig; Janne Koskimäki; Karen Lane; Jennifer J Majersik; Nichol McBee; Leslie Morrison; Robert Shenkar; Agnieszka Stadnik; Richard E Thompson; Joseph Zabramski; Hussein A Zeineddine; Issam A Awad
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 8.  Clinical Management of Cavernous Malformations.

Authors:  Kelly D Flemming
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 9.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Screening for Asymptomatic Brain Tumors: A Review.

Authors:  Alfred I Neugut; Paul Sackstein; Grace C Hillyer; Judith S Jacobson; Jeffrey Bruce; Andrew B Lassman; Philip A Stieg
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-10-10

10.  Incidental Brain MRI Findings in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  V Dangouloff-Ros; C-J Roux; G Boulouis; R Levy; N Nicolas; C Lozach; D Grevent; F Brunelle; N Boddaert; O Naggara
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.