Sean P Polster1, Ying Cao1, Timothy Carroll2, Kelly Flemming3, Romuald Girard1, Daniel Hanley4, Nicholas Hobson1, Helen Kim5, James Koenig6, Janne Koskimäki1, Karen Lane4, Jennifer J Majersik7, Nichol McBee4, Leslie Morrison8, Robert Shenkar1, Agnieszka Stadnik1, Richard E Thompson4, Joseph Zabramski9, Hussein A Zeineddine1, Issam A Awad1. 1. Neurovascular Surgery Program, Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois. 2. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois. 3. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 4. Division of Brain Injury Outcomes, Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland. 5. Center for Cerebrovascular Research, Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 6. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, Maryland. 7. Department of Neurology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. 8. Department of Neurology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico. 9. Department of Neurological Surgery, The Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, ArizonaAll except the first and final author are listed in alphabetic order.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Brain cavernous angiomas with symptomatic hemorrhage (CASH) are uncommon but exact a heavy burden of neurological disability from recurrent bleeding, for which there is no proven therapy. Candidate drugs to stabilize the CASH lesion and prevent rebleeding will ultimately require testing of safety and efficacy in multisite clinical trials. Much progress has been made in understanding the epidemiology of CASH, and novel biomarkers have been linked to the biological mechanisms and clinical activity in lesions. Yet, the ability to enroll and risk-stratify CASH subjects has never been assessed prospectively at multiple sites. Biomarkers and other outcomes have not been evaluated for their sensitivity and reliability, nor have they been harmonized across sites. OBJECTIVE: To address knowledge gaps and establish a research network as infrastructure for future clinical trials, through the Trial Readiness grant mechanism, funded by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke/National Institutes of Health. METHODS: This project includes an observational cohort study to assess (1) the feasibility of screening, enrollment rates, baseline disease categorization, and follow-up of CASH using common data elements at multiple sites, (2) the reliability of imaging biomarkers including quantitative susceptibility mapping and permeability measures that have been shown to correlate with lesion activity, and (3) the rates of recurrent hemorrhage and change in functional status and biomarker measurements during prospective follow-up. EXPECTED OUTCOMES: We propose a harmonized multisite assessment of enrollment rates of CASH, baseline features relevant to stratification in clinical trials, and follow-up assessments of functional outcomes in relation to clinical bleeds. We introduce novel biomarkers of vascular leak and hemorrhage, with firm mechanistic foundations, which have been linked to clinical disease activity. We shall test their reliability and validity at multiple sites, and assess their changes over time, with and without clinical rebleeds, hence their fitness as outcome instruments in clinical trials. DISCUSSION: The timing cannot be more opportune, with therapeutic targets identified, exceptional collaboration among researchers and the patient community, along with several drugs ready to benefit from development of a path to clinical testing using this network in the next 5 years.
BACKGROUND: Brain cavernous angiomas with symptomatic hemorrhage (CASH) are uncommon but exact a heavy burden of neurological disability from recurrent bleeding, for which there is no proven therapy. Candidate drugs to stabilize the CASH lesion and prevent rebleeding will ultimately require testing of safety and efficacy in multisite clinical trials. Much progress has been made in understanding the epidemiology of CASH, and novel biomarkers have been linked to the biological mechanisms and clinical activity in lesions. Yet, the ability to enroll and risk-stratify CASH subjects has never been assessed prospectively at multiple sites. Biomarkers and other outcomes have not been evaluated for their sensitivity and reliability, nor have they been harmonized across sites. OBJECTIVE: To address knowledge gaps and establish a research network as infrastructure for future clinical trials, through the Trial Readiness grant mechanism, funded by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke/National Institutes of Health. METHODS: This project includes an observational cohort study to assess (1) the feasibility of screening, enrollment rates, baseline disease categorization, and follow-up of CASH using common data elements at multiple sites, (2) the reliability of imaging biomarkers including quantitative susceptibility mapping and permeability measures that have been shown to correlate with lesion activity, and (3) the rates of recurrent hemorrhage and change in functional status and biomarker measurements during prospective follow-up. EXPECTED OUTCOMES: We propose a harmonized multisite assessment of enrollment rates of CASH, baseline features relevant to stratification in clinical trials, and follow-up assessments of functional outcomes in relation to clinical bleeds. We introduce novel biomarkers of vascular leak and hemorrhage, with firm mechanistic foundations, which have been linked to clinical disease activity. We shall test their reliability and validity at multiple sites, and assess their changes over time, with and without clinical rebleeds, hence their fitness as outcome instruments in clinical trials. DISCUSSION: The timing cannot be more opportune, with therapeutic targets identified, exceptional collaboration among researchers and the patient community, along with several drugs ready to benefit from development of a path to clinical testing using this network in the next 5 years.
Authors: Thomas Dukatz; Johannes Sarnthein; Helmut Sitter; Oliver Bozinov; Ludwig Benes; Ulrich Sure; Helmut Bertalanffy Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Amy L Akers; Eric Johnson; Gary K Steinberg; Joseph M Zabramski; Douglas A Marchuk Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2008-12-16 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Julie M Hall; Margaret A Horne; Fiona Moultrie; Colin B Josephson; Jo J Bhattacharya; Carl E Counsell; Gordon D Murray; Vakis Papanastassiou; Vaughn Ritchie; Richard C Roberts; Robin J Sellar; Charles P Warlow Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2012-01-31 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Marc C Mabray; Arvind Caprihan; Jeffrey Nelson; Charles E McCulloch; Atif Zafar; Helen Kim; Blaine L Hart; Leslie Morrison Journal: Transl Stroke Res Date: 2019-10-23 Impact factor: 6.829
Authors: Nicholas Hobson; Sean P Polster; Ying Cao; Kelly Flemming; Yunhong Shu; John Huston; Chandra Y Gerrard; Reed Selwyn; Marc Mabray; Atif Zafar; Romuald Girard; Julián Carrión-Penagos; Yu Fen Chen; Todd Parrish; Xiaohong Joe Zhou; James I Koenig; Robert Shenkar; Agnieszka Stadnik; Janne Koskimäki; Alexey Dimov; Dallas Turley; Timothy Carroll; Issam A Awad Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-09-12 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Seán B Lyne; Romuald Girard; Janne Koskimäki; Hussein A Zeineddine; Dongdong Zhang; Ying Cao; Yan Li; Agnieszka Stadnik; Thomas Moore; Rhonda Lightle; Changbin Shi; Robert Shenkar; Julián Carrión-Penagos; Sean P Polster; Sharbel Romanos; Amy Akers; Miguel Lopez-Ramirez; Kevin J Whitehead; Mark L Kahn; Mark H Ginsberg; Douglas A Marchuk; Issam A Awad Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2019-06-20
Authors: Abhinav Srinath; Ying Li; Romuald Girard; Issam A Awad; Sharbel G Romanos; Bingqing Xie; Chang Chen; Yan Li; Thomas Moore; Dehua Bi; Je Yeong Sone; Rhonda Lightle; Nick Hobson; Dongdong Zhang; Janne Koskimäki; Le Shen; Sara McCurdy; Catherine Chinhchu Lai; Agnieszka Stadnik; Kristina Piedad; Julián Carrión-Penagos; Abdallah Shkoukani; Daniel Snellings; Robert Shenkar; Dinanath Sulakhe; Yuan Ji; Miguel A Lopez-Ramirez; Mark L Kahn; Douglas A Marchuk; Mark H Ginsberg Journal: Transl Stroke Res Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 6.829
Authors: Romuald Girard; Yan Li; Agnieszka Stadnik; Robert Shenkar; Nicholas Hobson; Sharbel Romanos; Abhinav Srinath; Thomas Moore; Rhonda Lightle; Abdallah Shkoukani; Amy Akers; Timothy Carroll; Gregory A Christoforidis; James I Koenig; Cornelia Lee; Kristina Piedad; Steven M Greenberg; Helen Kim; Kelly D Flemming; Yuan Ji; Issam A Awad Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Helen Kim; Kelly D Flemming; Jeffrey A Nelson; Avery Lui; Jennifer J Majersik; Michael Dela Cruz; Joseph Zabramski; Odilette Trevizo; Giuseppe Lanzino; Atif Zafar; Michel Torbey; Marc C Mabray; Myranda Robinson; Jared Narvid; Janine Lupo; Richard E Thompson; Daniel F Hanley; Nichol McBee; Kevin Treine; Noeleen Ostapkovich; Agnieszka Stadnik; Kristina Piedad; Nicholas Hobson; Timothy Carroll; Abdallah Shkoukani; Julián Carrión-Penagos; Carolina Mendoza-Puccini; James I Koenig; Issam Awad Journal: Stroke Date: 2021-09-16 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Daniel A Snellings; Courtney C Hong; Aileen A Ren; Miguel A Lopez-Ramirez; Romuald Girard; Abhinav Srinath; Douglas A Marchuk; Mark H Ginsberg; Issam A Awad; Mark L Kahn Journal: Circ Res Date: 2021-06-24 Impact factor: 23.213