PURPOSE: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) is relatively rare and has a generally better prognosis than does pancreatic cancer. However, as its prognosis in patients with lymph node metastasis (LNM) is unclear, lymph node dissection for PNET is controversial. Our study aimed to clarify the significance of LNM in PNET. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 83 PNET patients who underwent pancreatic resections with lymph node dissection at Kumamoto University Hospital, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, and Kumamoto Regional Medical Center from April 2001 to December 2014. Their clinicopathological parameters were analyzed by the absence or presence of LNM, and with regard to the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). A predictive score of LNM was also made using the age, tumor size, primary tumor location, and tumor function. RESULTS: Although the 5-year OS was 74.8% for LNM+ and 94.6% for LNM- (P = 0.002), LNM was not an independent risk factor for the OS in a multivariate analysis. However, tumors larger than 1.8 cm were found to be an independent prognostic factor, and the cut-off value for the predictive score was 1.69. CONCLUSIONS: Although LNM was not an independent prognostic factor, lymph node dissection is recommended for patients whose predictive score is larger than 1.69.
PURPOSE:Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) is relatively rare and has a generally better prognosis than does pancreatic cancer. However, as its prognosis in patients with lymph node metastasis (LNM) is unclear, lymph node dissection for PNET is controversial. Our study aimed to clarify the significance of LNM in PNET. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 83 PNET patients who underwent pancreatic resections with lymph node dissection at Kumamoto University Hospital, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, and Kumamoto Regional Medical Center from April 2001 to December 2014. Their clinicopathological parameters were analyzed by the absence or presence of LNM, and with regard to the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). A predictive score of LNM was also made using the age, tumor size, primary tumor location, and tumor function. RESULTS: Although the 5-year OS was 74.8% for LNM+ and 94.6% for LNM- (P = 0.002), LNM was not an independent risk factor for the OS in a multivariate analysis. However, tumors larger than 1.8 cm were found to be an independent prognostic factor, and the cut-off value for the predictive score was 1.69. CONCLUSIONS: Although LNM was not an independent prognostic factor, lymph node dissection is recommended for patients whose predictive score is larger than 1.69.
Authors: Steven N Hochwald; Sui Zee; Kevin C Conlon; Roberto Colleoni; Otway Louie; Murray F Brennan; David S Klimstra Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-06-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Yassar M Hashim; Kathryn M Trinkaus; David C Linehan; Steven S Strasberg; Ryan C Fields; Dengfeng Cao; William G Hawkins Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: L Fischer; F Bergmann; S Schimmack; U Hinz; S Prieß; B P Müller-Stich; J Werner; T Hackert; M W Büchler Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2014-08-13 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: James C Yao; Manal Hassan; Alexandria Phan; Cecile Dagohoy; Colleen Leary; Jeannette E Mares; Eddie K Abdalla; Jason B Fleming; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Asif Rashid; Douglas B Evans Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Karl Y Bilimoria; Mark S Talamonti; James S Tomlinson; Andrew K Stewart; David P Winchester; Clifford Y Ko; David J Bentrem Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Ding Ding; Ammar A Javed; Chunhui Yuan; Michael J Wright; Zunaira N Javed; Jonathan A Teinor; I Chae Ye; Richard A Burkhart; John L Cameron; Matthew J Weiss; Christopher L Wolfgang; Jin He Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2020-02-05 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Masayuki Tanaka; Max Heckler; André L Mihaljevic; Pascal Probst; Ulla Klaiber; Ulrike Heger; Simon Schimmack; Markus W Büchler; Thilo Hackert Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2020-07-27 Impact factor: 5.344