Literature DB >> 27334268

Mutation Is a Sufficient and Robust Predictor of Genetic Variation for Mitotic Spindle Traits in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Reza Farhadifar1, José Miguel Ponciano2, Erik C Andersen3, Daniel J Needleman1, Charles F Baer4.   

Abstract

Different types of phenotypic traits consistently exhibit different levels of genetic variation in natural populations. There are two potential explanations: Either mutation produces genetic variation at different rates or natural selection removes or promotes genetic variation at different rates. Whether mutation or selection is of greater general importance is a longstanding unresolved question in evolutionary genetics. We report mutational variances (VM) for 19 traits related to the first mitotic cell division in Caenorhabditis elegans and compare them to the standing genetic variances (VG) for the same suite of traits in a worldwide collection C. elegans Two robust conclusions emerge. First, the mutational process is highly repeatable: The correlation between VM in two independent sets of mutation accumulation lines is ∼0.9. Second, VM for a trait is a good predictor of VG for that trait: The correlation between VM and VG is ∼0.9. This result is predicted for a population at mutation-selection balance; it is not predicted if balancing selection plays a primary role in maintaining genetic variation.
Copyright © 2016 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mutation accumulation; mutational robustness; mutational variance; mutation–selection balance; persistence time

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27334268      PMCID: PMC4981282          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.185736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  30 in total

Review 1.  Terumi Mukai and the riddle of deleterious mutation rates.

Authors:  P D Keightley; A Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Canalization in evolutionary genetics: a stabilizing theory?

Authors:  G Gibson; G Wagner
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.345

3.  On the persistence and pervasiveness of a new mutation.

Authors:  Aurora García-Dorado; Armando Caballero; James F Crow
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Deleterious mutations, apparent stabilizing selection and the maintenance of quantitative variation.

Authors:  A S Kondrashov; M Turelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  A review of some fundamental concepts and problems of population genetics.

Authors:  T DOBZHANSKY
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1955

6.  Comparing mutational and standing genetic variability for fitness and size in Caenorhabditis briggsae and C. elegans.

Authors:  Matthew P Salomon; Dejerianne Ostrow; Naomi Phillips; Dustin Blanton; Whitney Bour; Thomas E Keller; Laura Levy; Thamar Sylvestre; Ambuj Upadhyay; Charles F Baer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Comparing mutational variabilities.

Authors:  D Houle; B Morikawa; M Lynch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Automated segmentation of the first mitotic spindle in differential interference contrast microcopy images of C. elegans embryos.

Authors:  Reza Farhadifar; Daniel Needleman
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2014

9.  Variation in base-substitution mutation in experimental and natural lineages of Caenorhabditis nematodes.

Authors:  Dee R Denver; Larry J Wilhelm; Dana K Howe; Kristin Gafner; Peter C Dolan; Charles F Baer
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  The quantitative genetics of phenotypic robustness.

Authors:  Hunter B Fraser; Eric E Schadt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Mutation predicts 40 million years of fly wing evolution.

Authors:  David Houle; Geir H Bolstad; Kim van der Linde; Thomas F Hansen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Microtubule Feedback and LET-99-Dependent Control of Pulling Forces Ensure Robust Spindle Position.

Authors:  Hélène Bouvrais; Laurent Chesneau; Sylvain Pastezeur; Danielle Fairbrass; Marie Delattre; Jacques Pécréaux
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Considerations when choosing a genetic model organism for metabolomics studies.

Authors:  Laura K Reed; Charles F Baer; Arthur S Edison
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  Polygenicity and Epistasis Underlie Fitness-Proximal Traits in the Caenorhabditis elegans Multiparental Experimental Evolution (CeMEE) Panel.

Authors:  Luke M Noble; Ivo Chelo; Thiago Guzella; Bruno Afonso; David D Riccardi; Patrick Ammerman; Adel Dayarian; Sara Carvalho; Anna Crist; Ania Pino-Querido; Boris Shraiman; Matthew V Rockman; Henrique Teotónio
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Evolution of mitotic spindle behavior during the first asymmetric embryonic division of nematodes.

Authors:  Aurore-Cécile Valfort; Caroline Launay; Marie Sémon; Marie Delattre
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 6.  Experimental Evolution with Caenorhabditis Nematodes.

Authors:  Henrique Teotónio; Suzanne Estes; Patrick C Phillips; Charles F Baer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Speciation and the developmental alarm clock.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter; Joanna D Bundus
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  A broad mutational target explains a fast rate of phenotypic evolution.

Authors:  Fabrice Besnard; Joao Picao-Osorio; Clément Dubois; Marie-Anne Félix
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 8.140

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.