| Literature DB >> 27331814 |
Corinne Dejous1, Hamida Hallil2, Vincent Raimbault3,4, Jean-Luc Lachaud5, Bernard Plano6, Raphaël Delépée7,8, Patrick Favetta9, Luigi Agrofoglio10, Dominique Rebière11.
Abstract
Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide and actual analytical techniques are restrictive in detecting it. Thus, there is still a challenge, as well as a need, for the development of quantitative non-invasive tools for the diagnosis of cancers and the follow-up care of patients. We introduce first the overall interest of electronic nose or tongue for such application of microsensors arrays with data processing in complex media, either gas (e.g., Volatile Organic Compounds or VOCs as biomarkers in breath) or liquid (e.g., modified nucleosides as urinary biomarkers). Then this is illustrated with a versatile acoustic wave transducer, functionalized with molecularly-imprinted polymers (MIP) synthesized for adenosine-5'-monophosphate (AMP) as a model for nucleosides. The device including the thin film coating is described, then static measurements with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and electrical characterization after each step of the sensitive MIP process (deposit, removal of AMP template, capture of AMP target) demonstrate the thin film functionality. Dynamic measurements with a microfluidic setup and four targets are presented afterwards. They show a sensitivity of 5 Hz·ppm(-1) of the non-optimized microsensor for AMP detection, with a specificity of three times compared to PMPA, and almost nil sensitivity to 3'AMP and CMP, in accordance with previously published results on bulk MIP.Entities:
Keywords: MIP; cancer biomarker; chemical sensor; electronic tongue; microfluidic; nucleoside; surface acoustic wave; urinary
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27331814 PMCID: PMC4934341 DOI: 10.3390/s16060915
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Commercial nucleotides used for rebinding: (a) Adenosine-5′-monophosphate (AMP); (b) Adenosine-3′-monophosphate (3′-AMP); (c) Cytidine-5′-monophosphate (5′-CMP); (d) 2-phosphono methoxypropyl adenine (PMPA). Solutions were prepared from buffer solution made of acetic acid/hydroxylamine (AcOH/NH2OH 1 mM pH 7) spiked with nucleotide at a concentration 5 mg/L.
Figure 2Description of the experimental monitoring setup associated to the LW sensor: a pressure controller (OB1 Elveflow) linked to an actuated valve injects the selected solution into the microfluidic chip, while a frequency counter measures the oscillation frequency as the output signal.
Figure 3Scanning electron microscopy images of AMP-MIP coatings on the Love Wave sensor surface. (a) Molecularly-imprinted polymer; (b) molecularly-imprinted polymer at higher magnification; and (c) non-imprinted polymer.
Figure 4Frequency shift (absolute value) of (a) three sensors to 25 ppm of: AMP as target compound, vs. the rebinding time (0.5, 1 and 2 h). The sensitive films thickness was 1 µm, the extraction time 3 h; and (b) five sensors to 25 ppm of AMP as target compound, vs. the rebinding time (0.5, 1, and 2 h), with the sensitive film thickness as parameter in the range 0.6 µm–2.6 µm.
Figure 5Real-time response of the sensor (a) to different concentrations of AMP as target compound; and (b) to AMP as target compound and specificity to three similar commercial nucleotides, each one at a concentration of 300 ppm.
Figure 6Binding sites in AMP-MIP.