Literature DB >> 18045780

Therapeutic drug monitoring of cancer chemotherapy.

Lamya Alnaim1.   

Abstract

Therapeutic drug monitoring is not routinely used for chemotherapy agents. There are Several reasons, but one major drawback is the lack of established therapeutic Concentration ranges. Combination chemotherapy makes the establishment of Therapeutic ranges for individual drugs difficult, the concentration-effect relationship for a single drug may not be the same as when that drug is used in a drug combination. Pharmacokinetic optimization protocols for many classes of cytotoxic compounds exist in specialized centers, and some of these protocols are now part of large multicentre trials. Nonetheless, TDM clearly has the potential to improve the clinical use of chemotherapy gents, most of which have very narrow therapeutic indices and highly variable pharmacokinetics. A substantial body of literature accumulating during the past 15 years demonstrates relationships between systemic exposure to various chemotherapy agents and their toxic or therapeutic effects. This article reviews TDM concepts in addition to tools based on pharmacokinetic modeling of chemotherapy agents. The administered dose of chemotherapy agents is sometimes adjusted individually using either a priori or a posteriori methods. These models can only be applied by using the same dose and schedule as the original study. Bayesian estimation offers more flexibility in blood sampling times and, owing to its precision and to the amount of information provided is the method of choice for ensuring that a given patient benefits from the desired systemic exposure. Moreover, the role and application of Pharmacogenetics as a tool for individualizing chemotherapy is discussed highlighting the agents and mechanisms that have been well studied and defined and their relevance to clinical practice. Finally, this paper address issues critical to the optimal use of TDM in a clinical setting, and the role of clinical pharmacist in this regard. In addition, it discusses future developments in this field that can contribute to improving cancer chemotherapy In terms of patient outcome and survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18045780     DOI: 10.1177/1078155207081133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract        ISSN: 1078-1552            Impact factor:   1.809


  12 in total

1.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of imatinib: Bayesian and alternative methods to predict trough levels.

Authors:  Verena Gotta; Nicolas Widmer; Michael Montemurro; Serge Leyvraz; Amina Haouala; Laurent A Decosterd; Chantal Csajka; Thierry Buclin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Kinetic nomograms assist individualization of drug regimens.

Authors:  Hafedh Marouani; Anastasios Zografidis; Athanassios Iliadis
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  The Valley of Death in anticancer drug development: a reassessment.

Authors:  David J Adams
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 14.819

Review 4.  Association between gene polymorphism and adverse effects in cancer patients receiving docetaxel treatment: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mingrui Yan; Xiaoyu Fan; Hongyanhua Si; Xiaoyu Wang; Zhe Wang; Zhen Wang; Xin Lv; Hang Yin; Yanyan Jia; Lili Jiang; Yangliu Xia; Yong Liu
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.288

5.  Effects of plasma concentrations of 5-fluorouracil on long-term survival after treatment with a definitive 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy in Japanese patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Akiko Kuwahara; Motohiro Yamamori; Kaori Kadoyama; Kohshi Nishiguchi; Tsutomu Nakamura; Ikuya Miki; Takao Tamura; Tatsuya Okuno; Hideaki Omatsu; Toshiyuki Sakaeda
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-10-05

6.  A new hexapeptide from the leader peptide of rMnSOD enters cells through the oestrogen receptor to deliver therapeutic molecules.

Authors:  Antonella Borrelli; Antonietta Schiattarella; Roberto Mancini; Alessandra Pica; Maria Laura Pollio; Maria Grazia Ruggiero; Patrizia Bonelli; Viviana De Luca; Franca Maria Tuccillo; Clemente Capasso; Enrico Gori; Marina Sanseverino; Andrea Carpentieri; Leila Birolo; Piero Pucci; Jean Rommelaere; Aldo Mancini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Single Cell Mass Spectrometry Quantification of Anticancer Drugs: Proof of Concept in Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Ryan C Bensen; Shawna J Standke; Devon H Colby; Naga Rama Kothapalli; Anh T Le-McClain; Michael A Patten; Abhishek Tripathi; Jonathan E Heinlen; Zhibo Yang; Anthony W G Burgett
Journal:  ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci       Date:  2021-01-05

Review 8.  Potential of Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM). A Critical Review.

Authors:  Aleksandra Jaworska; Stefano Fornasaro; Valter Sergo; Alois Bonifacio
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-19

9.  Love Acoustic Wave-Based Devices and Molecularly-Imprinted Polymers as Versatile Sensors for Electronic Nose or Tongue for Cancer Monitoring.

Authors:  Corinne Dejous; Hamida Hallil; Vincent Raimbault; Jean-Luc Lachaud; Bernard Plano; Raphaël Delépée; Patrick Favetta; Luigi Agrofoglio; Dominique Rebière
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and drug exposure-toxicity correlation study of docetaxel based chemotherapy in Chinese head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Yuxiang Ma; Qingguang Lin; Yunpeng Yang; Weiting Liang; S J Salamone; Yunying Li; Yuehao Lin; Hongyun Zhao; Yuanyuan Zhao; Wenfeng Fang; Yan Huang; Li Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.