| Literature DB >> 27330744 |
Rainer Mosenthin1, Ulrike Messerschmidt2, Nadja Sauer3, Patrick Carré4, Alain Quinsac5, Friedrich Schöne6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: During processing in a desolventizer/toaster (DT), rapeseed meal (RSM) is heated to evaporate the hexane and to reduce the level of heat-labile anti-nutritional factors such as glucosinolates (GSL). However, excessive heat treatment may reduce amino acid (AA) content in addition to lower AA digestibility and availability in RSM. The objective of the present study was to produce from one batch of a 00-rapeseed variety (17 μmol GSL/g dry matter (DM), seed grade quality) five differently processed RSM under standardized and defined conditions in a pilot plant, and to determine the impact of these different treatments on protein solubility and chemical composition, in particular with regard to contents of AA including reactive Lys (rLys) and levels of total and individual GSL.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-nutritional factor; Glucosinolate; Processing; Protein quality; Rapeseed meal
Year: 2016 PMID: 27330744 PMCID: PMC4912811 DOI: 10.1186/s40104-016-0095-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anim Sci Biotechnol ISSN: 1674-9782
Fig. 1Flow chart of rapeseed processing in a pilot plant (OLEAD, Pessac, France)
Fig. 2Scheme of continuous belt extractor (Desmet Ballestra, Zaventem, Belgium)
Fig. 3Scheme of desolventizer/toaster (Schumacher type, Desmet Ballestra, Zaventem, Belgium)
Characterization of the desolventizing/toasting processes of rapeseed mealsa
| Rapeseed meal | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desolventizing/toasting | Ab | Bb | Cb | Db | Ec |
| Residence time, min | 48 | 64 | 76 | 93 | 60 |
| Indirect heat, kPa | 850 | 850 | 850 | 850 | 450 |
| Direct steam flow rate, kg/h | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 30 |
| Temperature, °C | 126d | 128d | 125d | 115d | – |
| 120e | 114e | 129e | 134e | 107e | |
| Toasting condition | WetTCf | WetTCf | WetTCf | WetTCf | DryTCg |
WetTC = wet toasting conditions; DryTC = dry toasting conditions
aRapeseed meals A-E represent five differently processed rapeseed meals under standardized and defined conditions in a pilot plant
bProduced from marc one
cBlend of rapeseed meal manufactured from marc two under the same processing conditions as for rapeseed meals A-D
dAverage temperature on tray five of the desolventizer/toaster. Tray five was not used for production of rapeseed meal E
eAverage temperature on tray six of the desolventizer/toaster
fUse of indirect heat at 850 kPa and direct unsaturated steam (15 kg/h) with mean residence time in the desolventizer/toaster of 48, 64, 76, and 93 min for rapeseed meals A, B, C, and D, respectively
gBlend of rapeseed meals produced from marc two was exposed for 30 min up to a maximum temperature of 100 °C to direct saturated steam application (30 kg/h), followed by indirect heat treatment at 107 ° C for 30 min at 450 kPa. Additional residence time in the desolventizer/toaster was 60 min compared to rapeseed meals A-D
Chemical composition of rapeseed cake and rapeseed meals (g/kg dry matter, unless otherwise stated)a
| Rapeseed meal | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item | RSC I | A | B | C | D | E |
| Dry matter, g/kg | 943 | 943 | 937 | 941 | 945 | 899 |
| Crude protein | 294 | 379 | 376 | 380 | 382 | 381 |
| Ether extract | 210 | 18 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 23 |
| aNDFb | 303 | 407 | 417 | 450 | 467 | 476 |
| NDF-CPb | – | 108 | 123 | 154 | 166 | 161 |
| ADF | 196 | 246 | 258 | 280 | 280 | 269 |
| ADL (sa) | 86 | 131 | 149 | 152 | 155 | 155 |
| Ash | 64 | 81 | 81 | 81 | 81 | 83 |
| Sugar | – | 93 | 90 | 86 | 86 | 86 |
| Total GSLc, μmol/g DM | 21 | 15 | 12 | 8 | 6 | 4 |
RSC I = rapeseed cake one; aNDF = neutral detergent fiber with heat stable amylase and expressed inclusive residual ash; NDF-CP = neutral detergent fiber bound crude protein; ADF = acid detergent fiber expressed inclusive residual ash; ADL (sa) = acid detergent lignin determined by solubilization of cellulose with sulphuric acid; GSL = glucosinolates; DM = dry matter
aLinear regression analysis refers to the effect of residence time in the desolventizer/toaster on chemical composition of rapeseed meals A-D. Rapeseed meals A-D represent four differently processed rapeseed meals under standardized and defined conditions in a pilot plant (for details see Table 1)
bLinear increase (P < 0.05)
cLinear decrease (P < 0.05)
–not determined
Contents of AA and protein value of rapeseed cake and meals (g/kg dry matter, unless otherwise stated)a
| Rapeseed meal | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item | RSC I | A | B | C | D | E |
| Indispensable AA | ||||||
| Arg | 17.7 | 22.1 | 21.5 | 20.6 | 20.6 | 20.9 |
| His | 7.8 | 10.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Ile | 11.9 | 15.3 | 15.3 | 15.2 | 15.0 | 14.6 |
| Leu | 20.9 | 27.0 | 26.7 | 26.8 | 26.8 | 26.6 |
| Lysb | 17.0 | 19.5 | 18.8 | 17.7 | 17.2 | 17.2 |
| Met | 5.9 | 7.6 | 7.4 | 7.6 | 7.4 | 7.4 |
| Phe | 11.7 | 15.3 | 15.0 | 15.2 | 15.1 | 15.1 |
| Thr | 13.4 | 17.6 | 17.1 | 17.3 | 17.5 | 17.5 |
| Trp | – | 5.1 | 5.0 | 5.1 | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| Val | 15.6 | 19.7 | 19.6 | 19.7 | 19.1 | 18.6 |
| Dispensable AA | ||||||
| Ala | 13.2 | 17.1 | 16.8 | 17.0 | 17.0 | 16.8 |
| Asp | 21.8 | 28.3 | 27.7 | 27.9 | 27.6 | 27.4 |
| Cysb | 7.2 | 9.1 | 8.9 | 8.8 | 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Glu | 47.0 | 60.3 | 59.5 | 59.9 | 59.6 | 59.3 |
| Gly | 15.6 | 20.1 | 19.8 | 20.1 | 20.0 | 19.7 |
| Pro | 17.5 | 22.4 | 23.5 | 24.0 | 22.8 | 22.2 |
| Ser | 12.5 | 16.4 | 16.2 | 16.0 | 16.7 | 16.7 |
| Reactive Lysb | 13.8 | 16.0 | 15.2 | 13.1 | 12.5 | 13.3 |
| Lys:crude protein ratiob | 0.058 | 0.051 | 0.050 | 0.047 | 0.045 | 0.045 |
| Reactive Lys:crude protein ratio | 0.047 | 0.042 | 0.040 | 0.034 | 0.033 | 0.035 |
| Protein solubility, % | 66 | 42 | 41 | 33 | 32 | 12 |
RSC I = rapeseed cake one
aLinear regression analysis refers to the effect of residence time in the desolventizer/toaster on amino acid composition and protein quality of rapeseed meals A-D. Rapeseed meals A-D represent four differently processed rapeseed meals under standardized and defined conditions in a pilot plant (for details see Table 1)
bLinear decrease (P < 0.05)
–not determined
Effect of processing conditions on the contents of total and individual glucosinolates in rapeseed products (μmol/g defatted dry matter, unless otherwise stated)a
| Rapeseed meal | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item | RS | RSC I | A | B | C | D | E |
| Total glucosinolatesb | 34 | 26 | 15 | 12 | 8 | 6 | 4 |
| Progoitrinb | 13.4 | 10.90 | 6.55 | 5.01 | 3.63 | 2.49 | 1.72 |
| Gluconapoleiferinb | 1.41 | 1.33 | 0.83 | 0.61 | 0.42 | 0.01 | 0.17 |
| Gluconapinb | 7.50 | 5.88 | 3.76 | 2.89 | 2.12 | 1.56 | 0.91 |
| 4-Hydroxyglucobrassicinb | 5.13 | 3.07 | 0.98 | 0.66 | 0.42 | 0.24 | 0.13 |
| Glucobrassicanapinb | 4.85 | 4.03 | 2.55 | 1.92 | 1.40 | 1.01 | 0.49 |
| Glucobrassicinb | 0.37 | 0.34 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.02 |
| Gluconasturtiin | 0.43 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0.16 |
| 4-Methoxyglucobrassicinb | 0.48 | 0.63 | 0.32 | 0.29 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.10 |
| Neoglucobrassicin | 0.20 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | n.d. |
| Degradation rate of total GSL, %c | 22 | 54 | 65 | 75 | 83 | 89 | |
| Degradation rate of aliphatic GSL, %cd | 18 | 50 | 62 | 72 | 81 | 88 | |
| Degradation rate of indol GSL, %cd | 33 | 76 | 82 | 89 | 93 | 96 | |
RS = rapeseed; RSC I = rapeseed cake one; GSL = glucosinolates; n.d. = not detectable
aLinear regression analysis refers to the effect of residence time in the desolventizer/toaster on total and individual glucosinolates contents of rapeseed meals A-D. Rapeseed meals A-D represent four differently processed rapeseed meals under standardized and defined conditions in a pilot plant (for details see Table 1)
bLinear decrease (P < 0.05)
cIn comparison to defatted rapeseed
dAliphatic GSL represent the sum of progoitrin, gluconpoleiferin, gluconapin, and glucobrassicanapin; indol GSL that of 4-hydroxyglucobrassicin, glucobrassicin, and neoglucobrassicin