Literature DB >> 28005224

Effect of pay-for-performance on cervical cancer screening participation in France.

Panayotis Constantinou1, Jonathan Sicsic2, Carine Franc2.   

Abstract

Pay-for-performance (P4P) has been increasingly used across different healthcare settings to incentivize the provision of targeted services. In this study, we investigated the effect of a nationwide P4P scheme for general practitioners implemented in 2012 in France, on cervical cancer screening practices. Using data from a nationally representative permanent sample of health insurance beneficiaries, we analyzed smear test use of eligible women for the years 2006-2014. Our longitudinal sample was an unbalanced panel comprising 180,167 women eligible from 1 to 9 years each. We took into account that during our study period some women were exposed to another incentive for screening participation: the implementation in 2010 of organized screening (OS) in a limited number of areas. To evaluate the effect of P4P, we defined three different measures of smear utilization. For each measure, we specified binary panel-data models to estimate annual probabilities and to compare each estimate to the 2011 baseline level. To explore the combined effect of P4P and OS in areas exposed to both incentives, we computed interaction terms between year dummies and area of residence. We found that P4P had a modest positive effect on recommended screening participation. This effect is likely to be transient as annual smear use, both for the whole sample and among women overdue for screening, increased only in 2013 and decreased again in 2014. The combined effect of P4P and OS on screening participation was not cumulative during the first years of coexistence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer screening; France; Pay for performance; Preventive health services; Primary health care

Year:  2016        PMID: 28005224     DOI: 10.1007/s10754-016-9207-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag        ISSN: 2199-9031


  41 in total

1.  The (in)efficiency of cervical screening in Europe.

Authors:  A B Miller
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Early experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice.

Authors:  Meredith B Rosenthal; Richard G Frank; Zhonghe Li; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Changing remuneration systems: effects on activity in general practice.

Authors:  A Krasnik; P P Groenewegen; P A Pedersen; P von Scholten; G Mooney; A Gottschau; H A Flierman; M T Damsgaard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-06-30

4.  Cervical cancer screening policies and coverage in Europe.

Authors:  Ahti Anttila; Lawrence von Karsa; Auni Aasmaa; Muriel Fender; Julietta Patnick; Matejka Rebolj; Florian Nicula; Laszlo Vass; Zdravka Valerianova; Lydia Voti; Catherine Sauvaget; Guglielmo Ronco
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Cervical cancer screening in the United States and the Netherlands: a tale of two countries.

Authors:  Dik Habbema; Inge M C M De Kok; Martin L Brown
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  French national health insurance information system and the permanent beneficiaries sample.

Authors:  P Tuppin; L de Roquefeuil; A Weill; P Ricordeau; Y Merlière
Journal:  Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 1.019

7.  Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Erin G Stone; Sally C Morton; Marlies E Hulscher; Margaret A Maglione; Elizabeth A Roth; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Brian S Mittman; Lisa V Rubenstein; Laurence Z Rubenstein; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Characteristics of subgroups of attenders and non-attenders in an organised screening programme for cervical cancer.

Authors:  L P Larsen; F Olesen
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.136

9.  Analysis of longitudinal data to evaluate a policy change.

Authors:  Benjamin French; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Cervical and breast cancer screening participation for women with chronic conditions in France: results from a national health survey.

Authors:  Panayotis Constantinou; Rosemary Dray-Spira; Gwenn Menvielle
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  3 in total

1.  Does mailing unsolicited HPV self-sampling kits to women overdue for cervical cancer screening impact uptake of other preventive health services in a United States integrated delivery system?

Authors:  Hitomi Kariya; Diana S M Buist; Melissa L Anderson; John Lin; Hongyuan Gao; Linda K Ko; Rachel L Winer
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Is the evidence on the effectiveness of pay for performance schemes in healthcare changing? Evidence from a meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Arezou Zaresani; Anthony Scott
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Effects of pay-for-performance on prescription of hypertension drugs among public and private primary care providers in Sweden.

Authors:  Lina Maria Ellegård
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2020-01-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.